Saturday, 19 April 2014

Godfried Danneels Belgium asks congregation to tell 612 6270 6949/50 facts 612 6270 6947 on AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE® SOCIETY. @WHITEHOUSE The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 ring 202-456-1414 www.whitehouse.gov E-mail washington.field@ic.fbi.gov email bcollaery@cclaw.com.au, fax 612 6239 6238, ring Royal Australian Special Air Services Bernard Collaery 61 (0)417 262 392 on him impregnating colleague Yolan Yik Paal mail@cclaw.com.au 612 6239 6033 and impregnating client Angela Magnocavallo 48 Anembo St, Narrabundah ACT 2604 61 2 6169 5679 614 1077 6071 "I now go out with Bernard Collaery." "Orderwithinchaos" orderwithinchaos@yahoo.com.au at Blackett Homes Blackett Property Group Pty Ltd Mode 3, Level 1, Suite 121/ 24 Lonsdale St, Braddon ACT 2612 612 6241 6311 61 2 6241 7855 or him taking client Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff "Mr Healesville" MrHealesville@mail.com 614 3777 3777 to Broken Back Braidwood (Mongarlowe) to sexually propose they have anal homosexual sex but not practicing while insolvent while owing bank $3 million via ACTARA or files wanted by ASIO in Manuka Court Bouganville Street basement or Bernard Cumacille is his real name and Gerard Cumacille is real name of his cousin Mel Gibson or illegality of him practicing from his residence Brockman Trust 5 Brockman Street Narrabundah. Bernard Collaery to be speared for violating tribal law. 4500 barristers and 30,000 solicitors know International Court of Justice would not allow insolvent counsel to appear on behalf of East Timor under any circumstance and realise every case he has appeared in whilst insolvent will have to be reheard with solvent counsel. United States of America public know because you ring press for $3 million worldwide media rights. Thanks Mr Healesville 0011 614 3777 3777. Visit Healesville Sanctuary and explore 30 hectare bushland haven for Australian wildlife. 001 ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE directs enquiries to HER (PAPAL BULL 1155, 1435, 1455, 1493, 1570) MAJESTY at Buckingham Palace Press Office Buckingham Palace London SW1A 1AA Tel: (+44) (0)20 7930 4832 https://www.royal.gov.uk Whistleblowers apply recruitment@royal.gsx.gov.uk Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926[a]) is the constitutional monarch of 16 sovereign states, known as the Commonwealth realms, and their territories and dependencies, and head of the 53-member Commonwealth of Nations. She is Supreme Governor of the Church of England and, in some of her realms, carries the additional title of Defender of the Faith (Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex 1455 to Genocide Around The World). Upon her invalid accession on 6 February 1952, Elizabeth became Head of the Commonwealth and queen regnant of seven independent Commonwealth countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon. From 1956 to 1992, the number of her realms varied as territories gained independence and some realms became republics. At present, in addition to the first four of the aforementioned countries, Elizabeth is Queen of Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Her reign of 62 years is currently the second longest for a British monarch; only Queen Victoria, her great-great grandmother, has reigned longer, at over 63 years. Elizabeth was born in London and educated privately at home. Her father acceded to the throne as George VI in 1936 on the abdication of his brother Edward VIII, from which time she was the heir presumptive. She began to undertake public duties during the Second World War, in which she served in the Auxiliary Territorial Service. In 1947, she married Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark, with whom she has four children: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward. Her coronation service took place in 1953 and was the first to be televised. Elizabeth II's many historic visits and meetings include a state visit to the Republic of Ireland and reciprocal visits to and from the Pope. Elizabeth has seen major constitutional changes in her realms, such as devolution in the United Kingdom and the patriation of the Canadian constitution. Times of personal significance have included the births and marriages of her children and grandchildren, the investiture of the Prince of Wales, and the celebration of milestones such as her Silver, Golden, and Diamond Jubilees in 1977, 2002, and 2012, respectively. Major events in Elizabeth's reign have included the Troubles in Northern Ireland, the Falklands War, and wars with Iraq and in Afghanistan. There have been times of personal sorrow for her which include the death of her father at 56, the assassination of Prince Philip's uncle, Lord Mountbatten, the breakdown of her children's marriages in 1992 (a year deemed her annus horribilis), the death in 1997 of her son's former wife, Diana, Princess of Wales, and the deaths of her mother and sister in 2002. Elizabeth has occasionally faced republican sentiments and severe press criticism of the royal family, but support for the monarchy and her personal popularity remain high. Pope's Apologies, Australian Diplomat, History of England make Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff 43 King of Earth and Kings and Renata 39 Queen of Earth and Queens from St Michael's Congregation Baulkham Hills, admin@stmichaels.org.au 612 9639 0598.

Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg


UNITED KINGDOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE

MI7 - Oondo.com www.oondo.com/search/MI7

NAME: Alexander Marcel Andrè Sebastian Barker Bailiff SC AKA: Mr Healesville VIC 3777

DOB: 1803 25/8/70 1800 552275 Tell: 61 2 6283 3533 Facts: 61 2 6281 3760 Mobile: 61 4 3777 3777

Your Reading - Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff, August 25, 1970 - 18:03 - Carlton VIC 3053, Australia


HOLY BIBLE 2 CHRONICLES 6:22 KING JAMES VERSION

When anyone wrongs their neighbour and is required to take an oath and they come
to swear that oath before your altar in this temple, then hear from heaven and act. Judge
between your servants, condemning the guilty by bringing down on their heads what they
have done, and vindicating the innocent by treating them in accordance with their innocence.

Sponsors ANU Debating would like to acknowledge our Silver Sponsor, Norton Rose Fulbright, for their support of ANU Debating.

图片



DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,




I would like to ask people to wear The ANU Scrabble® Society logo on a T-shirt.

I would like to thank my Uncle Wilf Barker, Phil Ruthven and Sir Anthony Mason.

Great Grandpa William Barker 1870 - 1966 Grandpa Mervyn Barker 1906 - 1980

Sgt William Barker is longest serving police officer in Australia, 1931, 41 years 8 months.

Mervyn Barker introduced mashed and pontiac potato to Australia, Petersville.

Grandpa Mervyn Barker market researcher was Phil Ruthven before IBIS World.

Grandpa and Grandma had Patsy, Wilfrid, Mervyn, Beverley, Denise, Christine.

Uncle Wilfrid Barker worked for Sir Frank Packer, Sir Peter Abels and Rupert Murdoch.

Wilfrid Barker won Sports Marketing & Management bid 2000 Olympics, Sydney.

BARKER                                WHO'S WHO IN AUSTRALIA 2000

BARKER Wilfrid John; FAIM; Media and Market Consultant, since 1986; son of:  M G Barker; b. Aug. 1 1928; ed. St Virgil's Coll.(TAS), Univ. Tas.; career:  Exec. Chmn CEO Wilf Barker Aust. Pty Ltd, R&R Pub. Mktg Pty Ltd, Baylin Dev. Pty Ltd, Dir Sunraysia TV Ltd, Javelin Travelin Pty Ltd, Project Dir Lon/Syd. Air Race Pty Ltd 2001, CEO Sports Mktg and Mgmt Pty Ltd 1986-1996, former Dir Mayne Nickless Ltd, former CEO Javelin Communications Pty Ltd, Chmn Media Cl Aust. 1982-84, Dir Network 10 Aust. Pty Ltd 1983-86, Gen. Mgr 1980-86, TV Dev. News Ltd, United Telecasters Ltd 1980-85, Bcast FM Pty Ltd 1979-85, Gen. Mgr and Dir Austarama TV(ATV 10) 1979-80, Dep. Gen. Mgr and Sales Dir 1972-78, Sales Dir Nat. Nine Network 1971-72, TCN9 1967-71, GTV9 1965-67; Chmn Fedn Aust. Comm. TV Stations (FACTS) 1980-82, FACTS Res. Cttee 1974-78, Chmn and Memb. TV Advertising Bd 1967-78; Project Dir Aust. Bicentennial Opening Celebrations; Cowan TV award, Olympic Order Merit; m.  Dec 14, 1996 Prassede, d. C Boschiero, 1 s 1 d; 22 Belcote Street, Longueville NSW 2066

180

TELSTRA ELECTRONIC WHITE PAGES NOVEMBER 1999

WILF BARKER
27 Dunios street Longueville NSW 2066
Tell 61 2 9428 34 36 Facts 61 2 9418 3647 Mob 61 419 997 505

WILF BARKER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Level 3/77 Berry Street North Sydney NSW 2060
Tell 61 2 9959 5722 Facts 61 2 9966 1807 Mob 61 419 997 505


Uncle Wilf Barker & Phil Ruthven both worked for Grandpa. Grandpa helped Phil Ruthven set up The IBIS Group and his company was the first company advised by The IBIS Group. Phil Ruthven has grown to be the leading adviser in Australia and throughout the World.

Phil Ruthven Chairman IBISWorld 61 3 9650 2166 61 3 9650 4033

Reception Level 3, I Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 AUSTRALIA



DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

“The Australian Constitutional Act (UK) creating an international scandal.”  

ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Terrence Higgins "It has been repealed." R v Bailiff 2011

Vol H of R 69 pages 427-491 reveal; presenting petitions,  Kangaroos 4, Social Services 3 and Repatriation 1; questions on immigration, television, Gazelle Peninsula - evictions, industry stoppage 3, Empress of Australia, aboriginal child, wool industry, health, Vietnam, water, trade practices, defence conditions of service, shipping; discussion, Vietnam and Indo-China, tariff proposals, tariff board; reading, Book Bounty Bill 1970, Broadcasting and Television Bill 1970 before a House of Representatives sitting suspended at 5:54pm Tuesday 25th August 1970.

Nine minutes later, in 7 @  132 Grattan Street Carlton, I induced labour eight weeks premature.
At 1 hour and 57 minutes, Gough Whitlam, Member for Werriwa, Leader of the Opposition, is speaking, violating the convention or threatening to block supply of the Appropriation Bill.
At 3 hours 31 minutes, Frank Crean, Member for Melbourne Ports or where I was conceived.
At 1 year 347 days, Anthony Frank Mason was just appointed to the High Court of Australia.
At 1 year 347 days, until 5 years 78 days Anthony Frank Mason learned enough to advise John Kerr.
At 5 years 78 days, a Governor-General John Kerr, dismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam.

I Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Barker Bailiff Ph. D. Laws (HC)(ANU) have "the most extraordinary, uncompromising and uncontrolled mind." I, "have special talents." "A rare exception as he is [I'm] extremely intelligent." I'm "the greatest untapped resource." "I [John Filler 61 2 6288 5990] have an IQ of 150, so you have an IQ of at least 150.","Contrary to common belief, the world is becoming a better place. The challenge is to make it fairer." "And I just want to play Scrabble® and have a Monopoly® on global justice, equity and truth."

In ANU O-Week 1992, I founded The ANU Scrabble®  Society.  On the 2nd of March The ANU Debating Society printed a document, defaming  me and The ANU Scrabble® Society. On the 19th of March in Melville Hall, Debating Society , Vice President - Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor - Kirsten Edward’s, Editor - Matthew Sag and others viciously pointed out the defamatory document referred to me and The A.N.U. Scrabble® Society. On the 20th of March I asked President -Simon Brettel and Editor - Matthew Sag  why the Debating Society deliberately defamed me. I was told that it was a joke. I said,  I want the Debating Society to treat it like a joke when I send a copy of the defamatory document and a letter to:-
      1.   The Chief Justice of the High Court - Sir Anthony Mason, who may think it a great                    joke however, he may not want to be patron of an organisation, who show a blatant               disregard to the law. (Defamation Act)(Disability Discrimination Act)(Crimes Act)
      2.   My mother and stepfather, Christine and Philip Bates in Sydney, both in law, who would, think it such a great joke, they would inevitably mention it to a friend who is a High Court  Justice. 
      3.   A friend of mine,  who is an adviser to the PM, who I work for, who would think it such a great  joke, he would inevitably mention it to a commission colleague, who is  a High Court Justice. 
I also touched on the notion of asking the makers of Scrabble® to also write a letter to the Chief  Justice. I said,  I would normally do what I had outlined, but I would be prepared to forget the entire matter  if:-
1.           I GOT A PUBLISHED APOLOGY.       
2.           I GOT A WRITTEN APOLOGY AND      
3.       THE BEHAVIOUR STOPPED IMMEDIATELY. 

The A.N.U. Debating Society, have a history of defaming people, as it counteracts the many insecurities of the executive and committee and members. The Debating Society  executive and committee,  knew the assistant sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey, then 19, was vulnerable, emotionally  very insecure and would do anything to just get peer group acceptance.  The Debating Society, conspired to incite, urge, aid and encourage Piercey to commit an offence (s.348 s.349), in order to prevent me from pursuing the action I outlined, which would jeopardise the Chief Justice of the High Court, from being their patron. Whilst, this conspiracy was evolving, the defamation intensified.  And second defamatory document surfaced, Timothy, to be published in student association newspaper. And on the 26th of May I told the President - Simon Brettel I had no choice but to take the action, I had proposed.

The A.N.U. Debating Society, assistant sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey had delicately been and sufficiently incited and encouraged, aided and abetted to make 7 untrue representations (s.134). Within 1 hour, she made 7 untrue representations to the Committee Against Sexual Harassment, known as the C.A.S.H., in return for her peer group acceptance.
1. I looked at her.            2. I sat in her seat in the lecture theatre.       3. I sat in her seat in the lecture theatre.  4. I sat in her seat, and when she  asked me to move I refused. (theatre has 400 seats).    5.         I swore at her.     6.         I swore at her.     7.         I followed her. 
When I met with Harry Geddes, from the Committee Against Sexual Harrassment (C.A.S.H.) and A.N.U. Law faculty, I explained what had been happening and what I proposed doing. Harry Geddes, told me, I was the one being harassed, and if I took the steps proposed it would cause considerable embarrassment to the A.N.U. and not to worry as he was investigating an unofficial complaint. Peter Bailey is the head of C.A.S.H., he and  ANU Faculty of Law advised. 

The purpose of complaints to C.A.S.H., was to impede me from pursuing the action I outlined.
Richard Refshauge advised from 3rd April 92. On the 16th of July, Ian Anderson, the General Manager of Murfett Regency, the maker of Scrabble® agreed to write a letter to Sir Anthony Mason, regarding the defamation. On the 20th of July I told Simon Brettel the good news. The same night, Piercey fabricated evidence, found in her room telling her to go to the Police station. So she went and saw her friend, fellow student and lover Const Harry Thomas Hains, fortunately I was not home that night. But on 22nd July, Hains arrested me, at 8:24pm, for a false accusation of threat to kill (s.30, s.344). On the 23rd July Rachel Piercey got an Interim Restraining Order (IRO) on that basis, a friend and solicitor Gavin Lee assisted. On the 28th July Piercey gave ANU Pro - Vice Chancellor Philip Alan Selth,  some fabricated evidence providing reasons why the ANU should hire a lawyer. ANU legal officer, Ann Featherstone, wrote Philip Selth a letter. Richard Refshauge (Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson [now Deacons Graham James] and on ANU Committee with Philip Selth), got an a 2nd IRO for Piercey.  On the 31st July I was arrested by Constable  Rebecca McNevin,  for the 1st false accusation of breach of IRO, and the 2nd false breach on the 17th August. Again by Constable Hains, for the third false breach on the 22nd August, and the 4th false breach on the 8th September. I was convicted for all four breaches, despite having numerous alibis. (C.T.150992).

I was remanded from 8th September, until 16th October or 2 days after Sir Anthony Mason had dinner with the Debating Society. During sentence, on 16th October, Const Hains was cross examined about Piercey’s false accusation of 21st September and attempted arrest on same night, whilst I was in Woden Valley Hospital. Hains admitted he rang the Hospital to find out what access I had to the phone, and then rang Piercey and informed her of my whereabouts and what access I had to the phone. Harry Hains admitted “it was beyond his duty” and that “he went beyond his duty because he had a special interest”(C.T. 171092, 051192).

On 28th of July ‘93, Justice John Gallop in the Supreme Court acquitted me of all convictions, on the basis that the way they had been conducted in the Magistrates Court entirely defeated the principles of our legal system.  The next two false accusations made by Piercey, were dismissed, by the Magistrates. I delivered over 100 subpoenas for students and Rachel Michelle Piercey made a false accusation Tjarda Strienstra threatened to kill her. Dt Const Mick Pearce, did tell Tjarda Strienstra, he believed Piercey was responsible and requested that Tjarda Strienstra not tell me. ANU Philip Selth and Richard Refshuage threaten to sue me for defamation, and have me arrested on a regular basis. I have been arrested 70+ times and charged 70+. (Still no convictions on record!) Even thrice for trespass whilst reading in the library. On the 23rd December ‘93, 5 lawyers for the ANU got a restraining order against unrepresented me.  My 1994 General Services Fee was paid at 16:19 on 19-1-94, but I am not allowed on campus until I win my Supreme Court Appeal. I look forward to only the First  Australian National University International Fellowship and Honourary Doctorate in Laws.

Prediction of 1 month, 3 days, before I was hit by a car on a footpath, only dislocated my left collarbone. I receive death threats on a regular basis. In 1995, The A.N.U. Debating Society incited and encouraged Piercey to fabricate evidence, make a false accusation, and commit perjury, I was arrested in the High Court on the 10th May 1995. I was recorded on video being bashed by police that night. I only predicted these criminal events taking place in a Writ's of Mandamus and Negligence lodged against the Patron of The A.N.U. Debating Society and Chief Justice of the High Court on the 3rd January 1995; some 149 days before the events. I even wrote a letter to the Chief Justice, again predicting these crimes on the 10th May 1995. This was faxed to the Australian Federal Police Commissioner at 4.00am on the 10th May 1995, 7 hours before Piercey told the Magistrates Court I threatened to kill her, whilst holding a gun at her head. And 6 months later Philip Selth also made a false accusation of threat to kill.

The pattern of behaviour I isolated in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 is an international scandal due to: 1. inciting and encouraging 2. aiding and abetting 3. fabricate evidence 4. make false accusations 5. commit perjury 6. commit perjury with intent. 7. perverting course of justice.
I was not killed in 14th August 1999 arson and Rupert Murdoch manages global media rights.
Poetically, Richard Refshauge asked me if I would like to cut a deal, I replied I don't cut deals.

Do Sir Anthony Mason, Wilf Barker, Phil Ruthven, Kate Bush, Jeff Brown or Gough Whitlam?


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,





https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzMmByuEyj1BdE9HZ05OTnFMZWM/edit?usp=sharing



Tuesday 16th March 1999

Sir Anthony Frank Mason AC KBE
Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia
1/3, 1 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000

Dear Sir Anthony Frank Mason AC KBE,

To protect the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, I lodged Writ's of Mandamus in the High Court of Australia against every Australian Police Commissioner; Director of Public Prosecutions; Ombudsman; Governor; Governor-General; member of Legislative Assembly/Council, House of Representatives and Senate; Senior Officer of Higher Education; and Australian capital city heads of Australian Broadcasting Corporation news/current affairs for radio/television.

As Uncle Wilfred Barker has told me that he will support me no matter what I do providing, I change my name back to my birthname and I do not sue the Chief Justice of the High Court for negligence, I can not change my name to your name to help you undermine public confidence in your office and you have to call a Royal Commission into the negligence of the Chief Justice of the High Court. I hand delivered these pages to 300+ consular representatives, before provided to you and every minister of countries on the United Nations General Assembly. I am sad to be damaging Australia by doing this, particularly leading to the Sydney Olympics, I am sadder still there is no Australian representative helping a life in danger, except the Chief Justice who did ask me to action the High Court Writ's.

I only wanted to be a detective until Grandpa died when I was 10. I thought if I could make grandparents live longer the world would be a happier place. I had no trouble getting perfect results during science study, aim - be a professor of medicine to make grandparents live longer. On 7/12/85 I sustained severe brain damage and was unconscious for a month at the age of 15 years, 108 days and 12 hours. Life was unbearable for years, then I started a company 10 days into the year after I completed year 12 and within 3 months I was offered a $1,000,000.

I was offered $250,000 deposit to buy my first idea. The idea would yield $7,000,000 from first day of national implementation and $21,000,000 over 12 months, "with a shelf life of 20 years." To quote the most important businessman in Australia. I told the man who offered to buy my first idea for a $1,000,000, "I was not interested in selling". My idea was to make the commercial market fairer for society, not for one company in the market to benefit, but many companies to benefit by making the commercial marketplace fairer and beneficial for society.

I met a man from a company which had over$100,000,000,000 assests operating in 50 countries, regarding a $1,800,000 capital injection into my company. The director told me that $1,800,000 would give his company an 18-week national advertising campaign. My company, for $1,800,000 could give his company total marketplace saturation for 12 months. I thought if I developed an idea for the commercial arena, I am able to look at the economic arena and develop an idea. 

I asked 1991 Treasurer Paul Keating, "I have developed a strategy that would save taxpayers $3.5 billion per annum. What should I do?" In January 1992, I asked Phillip Ruddock the question of saving taxpayers $3.5 billion per annum.

In Australian National University Orientation Week 1992, I accepted written advice of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia and I also founded the Australian National University Scrabble® Society. Ian Anderson the Managing 


Director of J.W. Spear & Son contacted me on 16 July 1992 and contracted me to 
develop complementary Scrabble® products to license, manufacture and market internationally in exchange for royalties worldwide. Ian Anderson explained Murfett Regency was a division of AMCOR, which was the 14th largest company in Australia. Thus implying AMCOR director's would support all advised action.

Developing commercial/economic ideas and meeting leaders of "The top 1000" companies regarding participation in national implementation of my strategies, ensured awareness of my special talents. Particularly since, Uncle Wilfrid Barker and Phillip Ruthven acknowledged, praised and supported me for my talents. To quote Doug Gillespie Macquarie Fairfax 2GB from 19 January 1999,  "Alex your Uncle Wilf was probably one of Australia's most significant Television Players ever. Good luck with your mission." Uncle Wilfrid was also Rupert Murdoch's right hand man and he personally bid to win the Sydney Olympics for Australia.

Phillip Ruthven worked for and was a friend of Grandpa Mervyn Barker, before he grew to Executive Chairman, IBIS INFORMATION, adviser to a majority of the top 2000 companies. Australia's leading commercial and economic forecaster.

"Son, this is a multi-million dollar idea." Uncle Wilfrid Barker hereby  known as Wilfrid Barker - just don't tell Uncle Wilfrid

"Alex do you realise, I was 40 when I worked out what I wanted to do, now look where I am, I am the most important businessman in Australia. Do you realise you are 19, know exactly what you want to do and how you want to do it you are going to go such a long way." Phillip Ruthven

"As far as I am concerned you have the most extraordinary, uncompromising and uncontrolled mind." Wilfrid Barker

"Yes they [politicians] know who you are.", "No one is questioning your intellect.", "I would like to invite you to study at the Australian National University the only problem is the Pro-Vice Chancellor, but you keep doing what you have to do." Professor Peter Baume

"You can not expose the negligence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, you will get a bullet in your head to silence you." Wilfrid Barker

"I have no intention of getting involved in anyway in the matters you have raised for the reasons which I am sure you will understand. I just do not believe that anyone will be trying to kill you for the action you have taken." ANU Chancellor, Professor Peter Baume

"I am in absolute disbelief as in the last week every police commissioner in Australia contacted me regarding your High Court cases and you have one hell of knack of predicting things. Yes, the police bashing you wrote about is on video. 
What on earth are going to do once you have finished this marketing project?"  
Comm Don McCullough for Comm Michael Palmer

"It is very significant to influence a company worldwide [J.W. Spear & Son] and you are going to make so much money." Wilfrid Barker

"It is good to meet the mind behind the Scrabble® products." Phillip  Ruthven

"The nature of life is the product of coincidence and fate. We met today through both." Human Rights Commissioner Chris Sidoti

"Alexander, thanks for your support for the United Nations." United Nations Special Commission Executive Chairman Richard Butler

"Contrary to common belief the world is becoming a better place, the challenge is to make it fairer." Phillip  Ruthven

"Alex, you are not different! You, too, have one life. Use it wisely. You have special talents. Your future is dependent on your seeing a worthwhile way ahead clearly and using your talents positively. Combining that philosophy  with 
your natural charm, integrity and warmth will create REAL achievement. Life is short, start now, use it well." Wilfrid Barker

"You are directorship material because you have original ideas." Wilfrid Barker

"I will support you, no matter what you do providing you do two things. 1. Change your name back to your birthname. 2. Don't sue the Chief Justice of the High Court fo Negligence."
 Wilfrid Barker

"You are going to damage Australia and embarrass the Chief Justice of the High Court." [ANU Scrabble® Society World Asylum Poltical Tour.] 
"You are holding Australia at ransom for a Royal Commission." "You are exremely dangerous.", "Fix it." Wilfrid Barker

"If the Australian Secret Intelligence Service had a licence to kill you would be killed." 
Wilfrid Barker

"I guarantee a Royal Commission when you are killed and I have the power too.", "You don't get your Royal Commission until you are killed."
"You can tell your Uncle Wilfrid I agree with him, you are holding Australia at ransom for a Royal Commission." Dt Sgt Jeff Brown 513 BEM

"Why you like talking to me so much is because you know you have finally met your match." Uncle Wilfrid Barker


Try thinking about a Royal Commission when ringing Uncle Wilf 02 9428 3436, Phil Ruthven 03 9650 2166, Peter Baume 02 6249 2113, Chris Sidoti 02 9284 9600, Michael Palmer 02 6256 7777, Richard Butler 1 212 963 3018, then ring 300+ Consulates or 100+ Embassies.

After a Royal Commission has been called ring me on 1917 913 0239, my busy Native Title Special Counsel 07 3307 3847 or busy Political Correspondent 0417 662 683. Write to Secretary-General, The Society of United Nations, P.O. Box 70 Australian National University ACT 0200.
Yours with disinhibition of personality and expansive overfamiliarity.


Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Barker Bailiff 
I induced labour 8 weeks premature after hearing on ABC Radio at 6:04pm that Gough Whitlam threatened to block supply in the Senate.
Secretary-General
The Society of United Nations


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,




https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzMmByuEyj1BSDJTWjl6dnVJdGs/edit?usp=sharing


VANESSA CAMILLE BAYLISS
AGED 16 YEARS 
19TH OCT. 1969 - 7TH DECEMBER 1985
PRECIOUS AND ONLY DAUGHTER OF
PETER AND CHRISTINE
STAUNCH FRIEND & CHERISHED SISTER OF
ALEXANDER & JEAN-PAUL
RIDE WITH THE WIND MY FRIEND
R.I.P.

Dear Sir Anthony Frank Mason AC KBE I write on the 13th anniversary of death,

The Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, erred in his judgment for 7 years.

"It is my pleasant task once again to write a few words of welcome to you, the members of... renew your membership because you are aware of the many benefits to be obtained from involvement with the Society; new members will quickly realise the advantages which membership brings. Participation in extra-curricular activities adds to the enjoyment of university life and offers the opportunity to forge lasting friendships. 

As patron, I was pleased to be able to attend the Society's Annual Dinner... wish the society continued success in all its activities during... year." 

To affilliate, associate and endorse an organisation violating the Defamation, Disability Discrimination, Australian Capital Territory Crimes and Commonwealth Crimes Acts and also being in contempt of the High Court Rules of Australia.

"Do you ..
# Feel the need to sleaze on to 1st years?
# Wear a hanky on your head?
# Interrupt committee meetings?
# And generally act like an ASIO spy after the electro torture?
Well then Scrabble is the game for you. 
And remember Deranged on a triple letter score is worth BIG points.

NONCOMPOSMENTIS, CONGENITAL IDIOCY, MALADJUSTMENT, PARANOIA, DELUSION, LUNACY" 

[Words printed in a Scrabble® formation.]
Edited by Kirsten Edwards Fullbright Scholarship and her lover Mathew  Sag

Federal Attorney-General's adviser Paul Bolster lies to Human Rights Commission.
Even Scrabble®  16/7/1992 M.D. advised me, "They have given you the evidence." The Australian National University, Deacons Graham & James, Mallesons Stephen Jaques and Australian Federal Police underestimated their one braindamaged foe. 

"I am writing in response to your telephone enquiry about this patients suitability to do a law degree. As you know he suffered a severe head injury. He recently had a full neuropsychological assessment which showed global impairment of cognitive functioning. He functions at the high/average scale, his premorbid function being estimated at a significantly higher level.

From this one would anticipate that he would have some difficulty pursuing his law degree and one would not recommend it without reservation. It might be best for him to enroll in a less taxing course for twelve months and, depending on his performance, then transfer to law if it is anticipated that he can manage the course." Gytis Danta, Neurologist, Canberra Specialist Centre Tel 02 6285 2460 Fax 02 6285 1944 

Fortunately, braindamaged foe with the best Phaedra complex medical barrister.

#. Parker QC, Roger, Barrister-at-Law, (61 2 9221 3890), p.127, Chapter 7, Adducing Evidence to Prove or Disprove Brain Damage, Brain Damage Medico-Legal Aspects,  Blackwell Press, Sydney, (1994). (My Phaedra complex Philip Bates is General Editor, UNSW,) (61 2 9385 2584)
“6. The Clinical Picture in Focal Cerebral Disorder Lishman says at p.16 that strictly focal brain damage can be responsible for both acute and chronic organic reactions. He says that a frontal lesion may confer distinctive changes of disposition and temperament. Most characteristic is a disinhibition with expansive overfamiliarity, tactlessness, over-talk[at]iveness, childish excitement or prankish and punning social and ethical control may be diminished with a lack of concern for the future and for the consequence of actions. Sexual indiscretions and petty misdemeanours may occur, or gross errors of judgement with regard to financial or interpersonal matters. Sometimes there is a marked indifference, even callousness for the feelings of others. Equally lack of anxiety and insight on the part of the patient into his or her condition. Elevation of mood is often seen, namely an empty and fatuous euphoria rather than a true elation which communicates to the observer. In other cases the principal changes are lack of initiative, aspontaneity and a profound slowing of psychomotor activity. Concentration, attention and ability to carry out a planned activity are impaired by these changes but performance on tests of formal intelligence is often surprisingly well preserved once the patient’s co-operation has been secured.” Reference:- Lishman, William Alwyn, Organic Psychiatry, The Psychological Consequences of Cerebral Disorder, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, (1987).

The Australian National University Scrabble® Society World Political Asylum Tour started by hand delivering these documents to 300+ consulates around Australia, only after 70+ arrests, 70+ charges and 70+ days custody of me had taken place.

Northern Territory police took me to Darwin psychiatric hospital, as I am "rather unusual". Psychiatrists scheduled me for 70+ days on the basis I was delusional because of an Australian Federal Police statement confirming the negligence of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia and paranoid  because of a sheet of quotes of politicians, lawyers, media and police advising me I will be killed.

Australian Federal Police do take statements to fight crime and win.  Likewise, politicians, lawyers, media and police advise people they will be killed for fun.

The United Nations aspire to improve Human Rights for all in 185 Member States.
© Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Bayliss  @ The Society of United Nations
Darwin is a capital city without a neurologist and as a result their psychiatrists 
misdiagnose as they are not familiar with the symptoms of severe brain damage.
And 1 psychiatrist said, "We have a rare exception as he is extremely intelligent",
others confirmed by ringing others they did not know whether I am mad or not.
Gytis Danta Neurologist 02 6285 2460, Attilla Gyory GP 02 6295 5997, Dt Sgt Jeff Brown 02 6256 7777 and Wilfrid Barker 02 9428 3436

Psychiatrists gave taped evidence in the Magistrates Court to schedule me. So I am making a formal complaint to Brian Burdekin, Special Adviser, United Nations Human Rights Commissioner as it is in contravention of United Nations Covenants.
Psychiatrsits; -Mellissa Finokin, Tovo Warren, Vladamir Todorovic, On Kyaw, Franco Garrupto, Randiri Singh, Mario San Pedro, Catherine Corniglio, Rob Parker, Howperachi Saro, Greg Hugh, Trish Nagel, Jo Lindall, Louise Nash, Danny Stewart; Darwin Hospital 08 8922 8888

The Commonwealth Attorney-General's, 20th August 1998, complaint of Adviser Paul Boster on 14th August saying I should see Prof Peter Baume, a psychiatrist, and be on medication as I am paranoid and delusional,  had Lishman's quote in it. Yet, I was prescribed a mood stabiliser and antipsychotic. An Australian Federal Police statement and a copy of others quotes does not mean one fits into DSM IV. 
Lishman, W.A.  wrote  "Elevation of mood is often seen, namely an empty and fatous euphoria rather than a true elation which communicates to the observer." in Organic Psychiatry, The Psychological Consequences of Cerebral Disorder, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1987). 

The Mental Health Tribunals of the Northern Territory, like Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland are a farce of legislative dark ages. This is why the Australian Capital Territory did not copy.
Phillip Thompson Registrar ACT Magistrates Court 02 6217 4332 Philip Bates UNSW  School of Health Services Management 02 9385 2584

I am grateful Philip Bates took me out of Prince Henry Hospital in 1986, where I was inspired by brain damaged vegetative states, to rehabilitate. Philip Bates was my outstanding personal academic who knew the most vital period for recovery was the first 12 months. I must question limited resources for other recoveries.
Hugh Dickson at Prince Henry Hospital Anzac Parade Little Bay NSW 2036 02 9282 5555 and UNSW Faculty of Medicine 02 9385 2444

Robert Tym advised Philip Bates,"Alexander does not fit into a psychometric category, he is just rather unusual." Asking later I was then told, "Unless you give me $400, I am going to write a report saying you are paranoid and delusional."
Michael Helman did offer Robert Tym $400, to get me off a false accusation on a plea of insanity. Under cross-examination told how he and Timothy Chadwick had breached client confidentially, then stuck his fingers up at the Chief Magistrate.

Ramish Gupta wrote, "This young man is eccentric and has an unusual thought process, however does not fit into a psychometric category." He later threatened to give me lithium as I had left an amusing message on his answering machine. Michael Shihoff prescribed tranquillezers, later breaching patient confidentiality in front of Robin Jenkins, as he abused me for never taking advised medications.
Michael Shihoff told Supreme Court that, "Alexander has a very traumatic life." 
Then fired me as giving evidence was not as lucrative as quick Medicare fraud.
Adelaine Hodkinson, Patricia Jongfer, John Sydney Smith misdiagnosed and misprescribed due to incompetence and undertraining of a medical profession.
Sydney Smith, Dr J., p.2,What is Brain Damage?, Brain Damage Medico-Legal Aspect, Blackwell Press, Sydney, (1994). Introduction 
"Drugs administered therapeutically can have untoward effects on the brain; 
the most controversial being the major tranquillizers which can damage specific parts of the brain causing movement disorders."
Will you question, "A Brief History of Time" or Steven Hawking as he is disabled?
Why isn't the Australian Medical Association accountable? In Chelmsford cases?

Your elevation of mood, disinhibition of personality or expansive overfamiliarity.
"Medical practioners skilled in the art and who are not alerted to search and analyse recognizable signs have been known to confess to error."
Parker QC, Roger, Barrister-at-Law, (61 2 9221 3890)
P.118, Chapter 7,  Adducing Evidence to Prove or Disprove Brain Damage, Brain Damage Medico-Legal Aspect, Blackwell Press, Sydney, (1994).

Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Barker Bailiff Ph.D. Law (H.C.)(A.N.U.)
I induced labour 8 weeks premature at 6:03pm after hearing on ABC Radio Gough Whitlam threatened to block supply in the Senate..
Secretary-General  P.O. Box 70 Australian National University A.C.T. 0200
The Society of United Nations   -   Making life easier. 


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzMmByuEyj1BUGZVYVBFa0hNY0k/edit?usp=sharing


Australian Capital Territory Restraining Order 93/494
Philip Selth v Alexander Buchanan Restraining Order
Exhibit No 17 Letter dated 26.11.93 by Christine Bayliss

Sir Owen Dixon Chambers
14/179 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Tel: 02 9373 7433
Fax:  02 9373 7422
DX: 343
EM: philip_bates@fcl.fl.asn.au

26 November 1993

The Chancellor, Pro-Vice-Chancellor and Members of the ANU Council

Dear Sirs and Mesdames, 

The ANU either directly or through legal assistance to other persons has involved my son, Alex Bayliss (Buchanan), in a chain of litigation over the past eighteen months that has incurred ovr forty Court appearances and periods where my son was needlessly held in custody for a number of weeks at a time. In every single case the courts have found the charges unsustainable. This is all the more significant when one considers that my son has, on most occassions, appeared as a litigant in person whereas on all occassions the other parties, including the ANU itself, have had legal representation.

The ANU has continually either provided legal assistance to facilitate such litigation on behalf of other parties, or it has more directly been involved to the extent of itself being a party to such litigation on several occasions.

In all cases the litigation has been a complete waste of time for every instance has involved unsustainable allegations or the request for orders which the Court has no power to grant.

It would seem significant that my husband has lost fewer cases in fourteen years of bar practice than the University seem to have lost in an eighteen-month period. Thus, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the University has been involved in what can be described as nothing short of frivolous or vexatious litigation. One might further wonder whether Pro-Vice Chancellor Selth made a wise decision in rejecting a possible career at the bar for an administrative university position?

I am further concerned that this chain of unsucessful has had a negative effect on my son's outlook. Where he once saw the law as existing for the attainment of legal remedies in cases where problems could not be resolved by other measures, he now sees it as something that powerful financial bodies, such as the ANU, use it for the purposes of mere harassment. This is understandable given the chain of events over the last eighteen months, the numerous occassions on which Alex has been arrested, the times he has been held in custody without bail, his many court appearances and the fact that, despite what should have been quality legal advice and representation by thier legal flotilla, the ANU, and the parties it has legally assisted, have on all occassions lost thier cases to a litigant in person.

Given this gross misuse of the law, it would seem to me that the ANU must minimally accept a large portion of the moral responsibility for Alex's attitudes. It is surely not the way to instill appropriate behaviour?

It has now got to the point that one must question which behaviour is appropriate - that originally, but incorrectly according to the courts, supposed to have involved my son, or the repeated, disruptive, and inappropiate use of litigation by the ANU? For example I believe that following instructions deriving from the Pro-Vice-Chancellor, University security called the police and had Alex arrested twice this week when he was reading in the University library. On both occasions he was unlawfully arrested and detained for forty five minutes and then released. This can hardly be regarded as an appropriate use of the law.

And even if the ANU successfully litigated in the future it would not be able to erase a record of eighteen months of seemingly vexatious litigation and a misuse of University funds.

One must question what effect a seemingly continued harassment has on a boy of Alex's age? If the ANU's own frivolous misuse of legal remedies has created an attitude problem in Alex then the ANU must accept moral responsibility. One cannot expect Alex to remain indifferent to the fact that his studies have been seriously compromised by unsuccessful litigation on the part of the University.

These problems cannot be resolved by further recourse to legal remedies. Furthermore, such attempts seem unwarranted given the trivial nature of the latest alleged offences. I have noted that there has never been an allegation that Alex has caused bodily harm to any persons or damage to property.

Alex deserves an opportunity to proceed with his studies without spending his life preparing to defend himself in the courts. But for the past eighteen months he has almost continually been preparing his defences in a lot of futile litigation. This, and several periods of unjustified incarceration (once lasting five weeks!), have prevented him from making any progress with his studies. This would seem to indicate some problem with what should be a university's primary role: education.

The sheer failure of legal remedies, the unjust disruption to Alex's life and his studies, the waste of the financial resources of the university all indicate that another more constructive approach is warranted so that Alex can get on with his life and the University can concentrate on his primary role as an education institution.

Negotiations between the Pro-Vice-Chancellor and Alex have failed because it would appear that there is some personality conflict between them. This is not to be interpreted as any negative reflection on the Pro-Vice-Chancellor; these things happen. But I am concerned that the ANU has not endeavoured to sit down in a non-threatening situation to explain its concern to Alex, and negotiate resolutions.

There was an initial attempt to at counselling (and my husband and I visited the University to facilitate that) but this was based on a premise of supposed fault that the courts later found unsustainable. Hence it is not surprising that counselling consisted of Alex protesting his innocence, a position which the courts later upheld.

If someone was made available genuinely to assist Alex with difficulties he was facing, then any concerns that the University might have, could surely be more simply and effectively resolved. For example why didn't the University send an independent Counsellor to give Alex support whilst he was spending several weeks in remand? 

Surely this was just as stressful for s student as having a drug problem, and just one example where the University offers support without regard to the question of blame.

It also appears that confidential discussions between Alex and a disability adviser were improperly disclosed by that officer by letter to This the Pro-Vice-Chancellor dated 15/6/92 to the University administration, and the University is now resisting attempts by Alex to see details set out there.

It is now clear the Supreme Court's decision to acquit Alex of all charges that the University had wrongly pre-judged Alex's supposed guilt, and has most inequitably given legal and financial support to one student, Rachel Michelle Piercey, in preference to another, namely Alex.

This inequity was rightly perceived by Alex to be a further injustice which compounded and inflamed the original injustice of allegations which he always protested were false. And his claim has now been upheld. The University should not have prejudged the Court's decision but should have adopted a position of equity and impartiality by either giving neither student legal advice or otherwise legally assisting both students and allowing the Court to establish the truth. In my opinion the university should apologise to Alex for the gross inequity in its erroneous pre-judgment of the outcome. However it would be self evident that a student wrongly accused would feel a heightened sense of grievance, and legitimately so.

I urge the ANU to negotiate a resolution to these problems in an appropriately delicate manner rather than with heavy-handed legal bludgeoning which will ineviately expose the ANU to ridicule when these scandalous matters become more widely known. It is also vital that the ANU issues appropriate directives to staff and makes suitable public statements which will come to the attention of the student body and others to overcome the prejudice which the ANU's action have caused Alex.

Because of his involvement in this issue, a copy of this letter has been sent to Harry Geddes at the ANU Law School.

Yours faithfully,


CHRISTINE BAYLISS


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CANBERRA REGISTRY                                                                              No. H.C.     of 1995

IN THE MATTER of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS against:

CHIEF JUSTICE of the HIGH COURT - THE HONOURABLE SIR ANTHONY MASON AO, KBE, and PATRON of the AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY.                                               
                                      RESPONDENT

ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRE SEBASTIAN BARKER BAILIFF, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY student #9204215.

AND

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE SOCIETY.
                                      PROSECUTORS.


BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE
BRENNAN, DEANE, DAWSON, TOOHEY, GAUDRON OR MCHUGH
 THE   3rd OF JANUARY 1995.


UPON APPLICATION made this day at the HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA, REGISTRY by Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff, Australian National University student #9204215, Chairman, Australian National University Scrabble Society and on behalf of the Australian National University Scrabble Society, PROSECUTOR, for an ORDER NISI for a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, against the CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, hereby provide an AFFIDAVIT to support the reasons why this WRIT OF MANDAMUS should be issued.


AFFIDAVIT
1.        
            I, Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff, of 7C Moorhouse Street O'Connor in the Australian Capital Territory, student  #9204215 at the Australian National University ("ANU")  and Chairman of the ANU Scrabble Society make oath and say as follows:-
1.1      
            I was born, on the day Gough Whitlam, Leader of the Opposition, threatened to block supply in the Senate, that is Tuesday the 25th of August 1970, an event leading up to the constitutional crisis of 1975. My life began, amidst  controversy, and is polemic, pleonastic and serendipitious. My idiosyncrasies     determine the path in life, I have chosen to passionately, pursue.
1.2      
            I am, Alexander Marcel Andrei Sebastian Barker Bailiff, an eccentric, who has an unusual thought process'. I am a sui generis social, political, legal, economic, commercial, and ideological, theory exculpator. I am,  a P.L.E.C.I.T.E. and exceptionally industrious and resourceful, effectively       utilising any resources available. My favourite pursuit, apart from developing  P.L.E.C.I.T.E. strategies, is playing Scrabble®. Exhibit 1.1
1.3      
            I am, the Chairman of the Australian National University Scrabble® Society.
1.4      
            I am, appointed by the ANU Scrabble® Society, to make this Affidavit.
1.5      
            I am, duly authorised by the ANU Scrabble® Society to act in any proceedings,  presentations or performance necessary to ensure achieving the 'Aimsand Objectives' of the ANU Scrabble® Society.

1.6
            The '"Aims and Objectives" of The ANU Scrabble® Society are to:-
1.7      
            Ensure justice and equity for all people and groups in society.
1.8      
            Develop interpersonal skills between people and groups of differing views and interests                                            through a range of pleasurable mediums.
1.9      
            Develop our vocabulary and enhance the use of words in everyday life.
1.10    
            Develop self awareness in both personal and career "Aims and Objectives".
1.11    
            Enjoy simultaneously achieving our and these "Aims and Objectives".
1.12    
            The Chairman is generally to have power to do anything to achieve the 'Aims
            and Objectives' of the Society - subject to the provisions of this constitution 
            and Commonwealth Legislation passed via The Australian Constitution Act
2.        
            The major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth, Australian National University, Pro-Vice Chancellor, for  Planning and Administration, Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy,       Cummins and Gibson (division of Sly and Wiegall) and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. In an effort to prevent me, the  Chairman of the ANU Scrabble® Society from informing the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia,  of major criminal activity of an organisation he is the Patron of, being the    Australian National University Debating Society.

2.1
            In 1992 ANU Debating Society, President - Simon Brettel, Vice President -   Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor - Kirsten Edwards, Editor -  Matthew Sag, and Sponsorship Officer - Stella Gaha did, "conspire to commit  crimes", "incite and encourage", "aid and abet", and be an "accessory after the  fact", to criminal activity of Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle         Piercey. Exhibit 2.1
2.2      
            ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey did "attempt, "conspire to bring false accusation", "conspire to defeat justice",  "attempt to pervert justice", "fabricate evidence", circulate "defamatory documents ", make "untrue representations", make "false accusations", "give false testimony", "commit perjury", and "perjury with the intent to procure           conviction". Exhibit 2.2
2.3
            ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey was also "incited and encouraged", and "aided and abetted" by her fellow student, friend and lover Australian Federal Police ("AFP") Constable Harry  Thomas Hains 4928, responsible for 5 arrests of in 48 days. And Constable  Harry Thomas Hains 4928 was "aided and abetted" by Constable Adrian Kraft      3260. Exhibit 2.3
2.4
            The Chief Magistrate Ron Cahill, presided over proceeding's in which he went  beyond his jurisdiction and "acted oppressively and was an interested party".  I was remanded from the 8th of September to 16th of October 1992 for a   "false accusation" that I telephoned Rachel Michelle Piercey, in breach of   Interim Restraining Order 1992/279, which expired 14 days before I was    arrested by Rachel Michelle Piercey's fellow student, friend and lover AFP Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928. I was released 2 days after the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court, attended the annual ANU Debating Society dinner at the ANU, as their       Patron. Exhibit 2.4
2.5
            In 1992, ANU Debating Society Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey's distinct pattern of behaviour was to circulate "defamatory documents", "fabricate evidence" make a "false accusation" of "threat to kill",   get a restraining order then make "false accusations" of breaching the order.
            Exhibit 2.5
2.6
            The ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration ("P&A"),  Philip Alan Selth hired his General Services Fee committee colleague -  Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson to represent Rachel Michelle Piercey after she "fabricated evidence" and submitted it to  him on the 28th July 1992. Exhibit 2.6
2.7
            Over 104 days, from the 22nd July until the 4th November 1992, efforts of:-
            Australian National University Debating Society, President - Simon  Brettel, Vice President - Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor -  Kirsten Edwards, Editor - Matthew Sag, Sponsorship Officer - Stella Gaha and  Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey.
 Australian National University Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth and any lawyers, academic's, staff and  students acting under his advice. ie. Gavin Lee, for Rachel Michelle Piercey.
            Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson ("MCG") - Richard Refshuage hired for  Rachel Michelle Piercey by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor - Philip Alan Selth.
            Malleson, Stephen and Jacques ("MSJ") -  Chris Chenoweth hired by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, P&A - Philip Alan Selth, for himself.
            Australian Federal Police - Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928, Constable Martin Leonard 4169, Constable Rebecca Louise McNevin 5038, Constable Adrian Kraft 3260, Senior Constable John Reynolds 2830, Constable Wesley James Herold 3874, Constable Michael Perriman 3297,  and Constable Pugh.
            ACT Legal Aid Office - Ms Crebbins, Kate Hughes - Ken Archer's defacto  and fiance' and solicitor Gavin Lee representing Rachel Michelle Piercey's.
            ACT Director of Public Prosecutions -  Ken Archer, Michael Chilcott, Pat De Veau, Cooke, Alison Chivers, Amanda Tonkin, Fiona Merrylees.
            ACT Magistrates Court -  Michael Somes, Peter Dingwall, Michael Ward,  Warren Nicholl, John Murphy, Ron Cahill, John Dainer, John Burns.
            ACT Corrective Services -  Director and staff of Belconnen Remand Centre.
            resulted in:-
            reluctantly issuing an interim restraining order, 5 arrests, 7 charges, 38 court  appearances, 22 days in court, 55 days in remand and 4 convictions, being released 2 days after the Annual Debating Society End of Year Dinner.
            Exhibit 2.7
2.8      
            During this period Christine and Philip Bates came to Canberra and had discussions about me and regarding my studies, with ANU, Disability Adviser - Margaret Miller, Counsellor - Leila Bailey, Lecturer - Dr Mac Boot, Lecturer -    David Adams, Tutor - Lorraine Elliott and possibly lecturer - Harry Geddes  and others. The ANU  being in contravention of the Commonwealth Privacy Act, as at no stage did I give written or oral permission to any of these  academics or staff to speak to my parents. When I asked ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor about the ANU "Statement to student's on Confidentiality of Personal Information" of 2nd February 1993, he told me he had written it. I           further asked him about the ANU breaching my confidentiality, by speaking   to my parents with out my permission, he told me "the ANU does not breach  confidentiality, except in extenuating circumstances." Exhibit 2.8
2.9
            Christine and Philip Bates, Peter Bayliss and I had a meeting with psychiatrist      - Dr Robert Tym. At this meeting Dr Robert Tym reassured my parents, "your son is not abnormal, he is normal, just unusual." At a later stage solicitor,   Michael Helman told me he would get me off the charge on grounds of insanity. When I interjected, saying "but I am not !" Michael Helman, told me not to worry as he had offered Dr Tym $400 from legal aid to write such a report. Ironically, when I again met Dr Tym, he told me, "he had been offered $400 to write a report saying I suffered from delusion and paranoia." When I told Dr Tym, "I had neither given Michael Helman or Dr Tym permission to         breach my confidentiality" he said, "it does not matter". When I told Dr Tym, "I had sacked Michael Helman." Dr Tym told me "Michael Helman asked for it before I sacked him." So I told him, "that is not what you told my parent's." Dr Tym then told me, "I have changed my mind and absolutely nothing is going to stop me writing this report unless you give me $400." I told him, "my          stepfather is currently suing psychiatrists in the Chelmsford cases and I am sure suing you for 'demand accompanied by threat' will be small fry." After this I was taken away by Remand Centre Officers to my next appointment with Dr Shihoff, my GP. I told Dr Shihoff, "Dr Tym made a demand          accompanied by threat to me" and explained in detail. Dr Tym rang up 40 minutes later to tell Dr Shihoff "that he would not write a report unless I gave him full written permission".

            About this time, I was multiple "assaulted", by Belconnen Remand Centre,  staff member Tony Gould.  Michael Helman, walked out of Court, sticking his fingers up, refusing to give evidence of him breaching client confidentiality,  after he had given evidence of how solicitor - Tim Chadwick had breached my    client confidentiality. Dr Tym did worse things when he was in court in 1994 !      Exhibit 2.9
2.10
            In 1993, I had various meeting with ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, also a barrister and solicitor, regarding the ANU having hired Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and  Gibson for Rachel Michelle Piercey, her "fabricated evidence", "untrue representations" and "false accusations". Another  "false accusation" was made when I was with Philip Alan Selth and days later Rachel Michelle Piercey "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" of threat to kill, against another male student - Tjarda Strienstra.
            Exhibit 2.10
2.11
            Upon  me informing Philip Alan Selth of this, he had an urgent meeting the next morning with Rachel Michelle Piercey. More importantly, Philip Alan Selth, became an "accessory after the fact" as he now knew what I had told him was true. So Philip Alan Selth, started having me arrested for trespass when I was found "reading in the library", on four occasions. It has been proven that I was reading in the library with no reasonable excuse. I have no conviction and no record. I will win the Supreme Court appeal. Exhibit 2.11
2.12
            ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth then, got a restraining order to keep me off the entire ANU. ANU - Philip Alan Selth, ANU legal officer - Stephen Herrick, MCG - Richard Refshuage, MSJ Chris Chenoweth and Malcolm Brennan, and Barrister - John Purnell appeared,  over nine days before 5 Magistrates, against unrepresented me. This was after MCG Richard Refshuage, had asked me "would you like to cut a deal ?", upon me showing him proof of Rachel Michelle Piercey's criminal activity. And after, ANU Law lecturer - Harry Geddes, gave crucial evidence in the Magistrates Court, establishing he saw Rachel Michelle Piercey's "fabricated evidence", quite as few later than she alleged giving it to him in a second piece of "fabricated evidence" of the 28th July 1992. Having "fabricated evidence" to provide Philip Alan Selth reasons to hire Richard Refshuage of     Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson for Rachel Michelle Piercey. Philip Alan Selth panicked and applied for his restraining order the day after Rachel Michelle Piercey 's restraining order expired. For the purpose of preventing me subpoenaing, other ANU witness, who can provide further evidence of criminal activity of Philip Alan Selth and Rachel Michelle Piercey. Exhibit 2.12
2.13
            ANU Debating Society Rachel Michelle Piercey's, distinct pattern of behaviour had surfaced again as she, "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" of "threat to kill", against another innocent male student. ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, Philip Alan Selth further established a link between the ANU his and Rachel Michelle Piercey legalaction and more importantly criminal activity. Exhibit 2.13
2.14
            In 1993, I was "commonly assaulted" by Constable Kelvin George Thorn 1639,  as he "inflicted actual bodily harm" and told his younger colleagues I had been harassing a Canadian woman, [being Rachel Michelle Piercey]. Witnessed by Constable Robert Duncan 4174, Constable Paul Sherring 4545, Constable Anthony Crocker 4832, and Constable Darren Bretherton 4997. I was charged with "assault" and "resisting arrest" after Constable Kelvin George Thorn 1639,         "fabricated evidence" for all four and "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" all four to make a "false accusation", "commit perjury" and "perjury with the intent to procure conviction". All gave evidence witnessing me "assault" and "resist arrest". After giving evidence, they were told I had just dislocated my collarbone, weeks earlier. At trial, Justice Gallop, advised me,  to "never take on the police as they will always win" as he gave me no conviction and no record. I will be acquitted in the Federal Court appeal.

            I told Chief Magistrate - Ron Cahill, how Rachel Michelle Piercey and Constable Harry Thomas 4928, knew when I was home before they made false accusations. ie. telephoning, if I answer I am home. I also told Ron Cahill of my fears for my safety. Expressing concerns of me being hit by a car. I was hit by YDA - 107, at 3:25 pm on 19th November 1992, whilst on a footpath, before        the motorist said, "serves you right and drove away". This was a deliberate "hit and run" and witnessed by:- Darren Thomas 5 Bennett Place Spence 258  6608, Chris 61 Cuthbert Circuit Wanniassa 231 2625 and Adam 62 Adolf Street Tuggeranong. Motorist was chased and he is Stephen Riley of 16 Miller Street O'Connor ACT 2601, Licence number 279865. When Police came the          female helped me, and the male threatened to charge me, near home and when he met me at Calvary hospital. I dislocated my collarbone, seeing Dr  Wright at Calvary Hospital and Dr Shihoff at Lyneham Medical Centre.
            Exhibit 2.14
2.15
            On the 27th of July 1993, it took me 4 hours and 39 minutes to be acquitted on appeal of 4 convictions. On the basis, "the way the cases have been conducted in the Magistrates Court entirely defeated the principles of our legal system." To quote Justice Gallop. Despite this, and the fact the swift    dismissal of these charges was well known through legal and police circles. I was still arrested at 0040 hours on the 9th of March 1994 for "failure to pay three $100 fines." Sergeant Hall tried to explain as he apologised and let me go, although he could not explain why the last four times I had been arrested,  AFP let me go from 45 minutes to 3 hours later, without charging me. My  fears, have resulted in me hiding for my own peace and safety. Exhibit 2.15
2.16
            ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth enlisted the assistance of the 1,200 academic, 2,200 technical and general staff, and more than 10, 500 students of which 2, 400 are from 60 countries ,  of the ANU in his, Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson- Richard Refshuage,  Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques - Chris Chenoweth, and ANU Debating Society   efforts to silence and prevent me subpoenaing witness' to expose their major criminal activity. As I did subpoena ANU Law lecturer - Harry Geddes, before giving crucial evidence. On the 26th of November 1993, my mother Christine  Bates wrote to the Chancellor, Pro-Vice Chancellor and members of the ANU Council providing them advice on these scandalous matters. Exhibit 2.16
2.17
            In 1994, at the XIV Worlds Debating Universities Debating Championship ANU Debating Society 1992, President - Simon Brettel, Vice President - Kath Cummins and Treasurer - Tim Hughes used the distinct pattern of behaviour  they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to use in 1992 and 1993. President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President -           Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes  "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" [of] that I "threatened to kill" them. So much so, Michael Gronow - Chief Adjudicator of  Melbourne University Debating Society organising committee, announced, to  hall of contestants from 100 universities from 20 nations, "that the tournament had been delayed for half an hour as the ANU Debating Society had caused a security scare by saying someone had threatened to kill them.  And it had been established that it was only a practical joke and that if the ANU Debating Society further delayed the tournament the organising committee would officially 'threaten to kill them'. Exhibit 2.17
2.18
            ANU Debating Society Rachel Michelle Piercey's, distinct pattern of behaviour  surfaced again when President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President - Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes,  circulated "defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" that I "threatened to  kill" them. They used this distinct pattern of behaviour since they were well        acquainted with it as they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and    abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to do the same in 1992 and 1993. The reason they did not again "incite and encourage" and "aid and abet" Rachel Michelle Piercey to use it in 1994, is because she was not at the XIV World Universities Debating Championships, as they were held in Melbourne. Exhibit 2.18
2.19
            When I rang Canberra AFP Internal Investigations Division, I told Detective  Superintendent Ed Hadzic of isolating ANU Debating Society, President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President - Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes, using the distinct pattern of behaviour they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to use in 1992 and 1993. They did this by circulating "defamatory documents", "fabricating evidence" and making a "false accusation" of "threat to kill". After I told AFP Internal Investigations Division, (AFP Public Relations Whitewasher) Detective Superintendent Ed Hadzic of this good news, he said "it was only a joke !"  As he twice sent me this, his response does not surprise me. Exhibit 2.19
2.20
            As ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, successfully got a restraining order keeping me off all property of the ANU including all of it's halls and colleges of residence, I was unable to go on  campus to pay my ANU 1994 General Services Fee for Re-Enrolling    Undergraduates. So I had a friend pay this for me, student number 9204215,          by presenting St. George Cheque number 187173, at 16:19 hours in exchange for receipt number 28016. This cheque was paid by St George Bank on  the 20th of January 1994. I presented ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, Philip Alan Selth a completed course enrolment form in Magistrate Court hearing RO 93/494, in December 1993, see Exhibit's.  I also sent one by certified mail, item H177494, to the Enrolment and Fees office on the 13th of December 1993.  This postage of $1.85 was paid for by St. George Cheque number 801997. I think it would be unreasonable, although not unlikely,  if the ANU have failed me in these  courses for failure to submit essay's and complete exams. Exhibit 2.20
2.21
            On Tuesday the 25th of August 1994, I wrote a letter seeking assistance.
            This letter has gone to 883 senior officers in Australian higher education; 222 Commonwealth, 139 New South Wales, 133 Victorian, 91 Western Australian,  88 Queensland, 69 South Australian, and 54 Tasmanian, members of parliament; 25 Northern Territorian, and 17 Australian Capital Territory member of the Legislative Assembly; 16 Police Commissioners; 16             Director's of Public Prosecutions; 16 Ombudsman; 7 Governor's and 1 Governor-General; 69 High Commissions and Embassies seeking political asylum; 92 Editor's of student publications in Higher education; 42 newspaper editor's and radio and television executive producer's of capital cities across Australia. Exhibit 2.21
2.22
            At my unofficial meeting with the Honourable Prime Minister of Australia, Paul John Keating, on the 2nd of September 1994, I told him I was having a major problem and he suggested I "write to the office". I did that same night,  as I did on the 1st of August and I have not received a single response, except Justice Michael Kirby. I personalised, printed and framed an inspirationalpoem I wrote, for Paul Keating, the Honourable Prime Minister. I hoped these good thoughts of mine, might charm him and be appreciated upon his wall. I gave it to Deana, the Prime Minister's receptionist, who placed it upon his wall. Paul Keating, apparently "once" looked at it. Ironically, Deana and I, first  actually met when I asked her if she would like to join the ANU Scrabble            Society in 1992. Exhibit 2.22
2.23
            On the 25th of September 1994, I wrote a letter to all 16 Ombudsman, with a complaint and enclosing a list of 1980 public officers.
            "The purpose of this letter is to make a complaint against each and every   name on the enclosed list. Please investigate those, within your jurisdiction,  and remit those that are not to the relevant Ombudsman, for investigation."
            I already know one Ombudsman, who personally wrote back, either did not read my full "1" page letter, or has no understanding of what is within his jurisdiction. Maybe, I should s.75 (v) of the Constitution Act him. Exhibit 2.23
2.24
                  On the 7th of October 1994, at 0900 hours I delivered two trunks of 1777 letters for Commonwealth and State officers, to the Prime Minister office. To my surprise, I got a message that distressed me more, than the death threats regularly left on my answering machine.
            "Alexander, it is Ann Mcfarlane from the Prime Ministers office and I have two suitcases full of letters, which I suppose - or I think you may want us to send out, we don't send out letter's like this, - um if they are not collected   today we will have to get them destroyed."
            To think, it was only the 8th of December 1994, Paul Keating said:-
            "But, we are guided by the thing that always guides us and that is if people are in trouble, no matter where they are from or who they vote for, let me say that, we are there to give them a hand."
            Fortunately, trunks Albert and Bill, were able to secretly get asylum in another Federal member's office, until I unleashed the 77 bundles of envelopes through some 53 members, for their electorate offices. The bundles must be well received, as I have only had four sent back to me. I know many members distributed them to institutions in their electorates. I even know some Federal member's have actually read, at least, the first letter - thanks !
            Exhibit 2.24

2.25
            As I had regularly written to the ANU Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Yeend, often simply asking for him to dismiss ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, before he further implicates the ANU. I was quite shocked by his untimely death. All 1980 public officers I had written to were even provided a copy of a letter I wrote to Sir Geoffrey Yeend of the 1st       of August 1994. 1777 I had delivered to the Prime Minister's office only days  before. As I had great respect for Sir Geoffrey Yeend, a great "people person",  I felt the least I could do was attend his memorial at University House. Shortly after my arrival, I was approached, threatened and intimidated by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor Philip Alan Selth. I asked him to leave me in peace as I was trying to attend a memorial service. As he did not, I placed my bike lock around my leg, and a chain around my waist to a rail I was beside. I was arrested the next day and charged twice for breach of the restraining order. One because I went to the memorial, and another because I checked my ANU Post Office Box and then chained myself to a statue outside the Chancellery at the student occupation. Magistrate Michael Somes remanded me for two weeks, as he feared I might re offend by going on the ANU again.  These charges will be heard early in 1995. Exhibit 2.25
2.26    
            On the 10th of November 1994, at 1900 hours, I had a meeting with ANU Debating Society President of '91, 92, 93 - Simon Brettel, at Conflict Resolution Service. Simon Brettel, told me "Rachel [Michelle] Piercey has been a good friend of mine for about 4 years" and "became a [1992] committee member at the beginning of the year". This is evidence proving Rachel Michelle Piercey          "committed perjury" on the 6th of August and 4th September 1992. I told Simon Brettel the significance of Rachel Michelle Piercey making "untrue   representations", "fabricating evidence", and making "false accusations" within  a short period of time of me informing Simon Brettel of letters to the Chief Justice of the High Court, re:- crime of ANU Debating Society. I gave Simon    Brettel 3 letters, 2 information pages and my business card, advising they   have been distributed nationally. Simon Brettel gave me his word that he   would not show or tell Rachel Michelle Piercey or anyone. In a matter of days, Rachel Michelle Piercey "fabricated evidence", made a "false accusation" and "committed perjury" when applying for a restraining order. After it is served         upon me Rachel Michelle Piercey will make more "false accusation's". I will then be arrested, "assaulted" by police and  remanded.
2.27
            The ANU Public Affairs Division invited a friend and I, to attend the ANU  Installation of Chancellor Ceremony and the Conferring of an Honorary Degree of Doctor of Laws. I rang ANU Council Member and Shadow Minister for Social Security, Philip Maxwell Ruddock to inquire about me attending in safety   from ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth. Philip Maxwell Ruddock, suggested I get a personal invitation from Professor Peter Baume. My friend and I wrote a letter to Professor Peter Baume which we faxed. I did not get a personal invitation, so I did not go for fear of my safety. My seat, J19 in Llewellyn Hall, remained empty while Professor Peter Baume was installed as Chancellor of the Australian National University and Professor Geoffrey Brennan presented an Honorary Doctorate of Laws, which was conferred upon Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Exhibit 2.27
2.28
            As my rights, enumerated in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 are being violated by the major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian     Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth Australian National University Pro-Vice ChancellorRichard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson, (merged with Sly and Wiegall)  and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. And I am arbitrarily arrested on a regular basis, I have death threats on a regular basis,  I have been hit by one car - whilst on a footpath - only dislocating my collarbone, I fear for my life and my life is in danger. I will ask Archbishop             Desmond Tutu to assist me in getting political asylum in South Africa.
2.29    
            So I wrote a letter to Archbishop Desmond Tutu seeking political asylum in  South Africa. I faxed this letter to the office of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, South African High Commission and Arch Deacon Oliphant of St john's,  Archbishop Desmond Tutu's Australian guide. I asked each of them if they            could pass on my request for assistance in seeking political asylum in South Africa, but no one would pass my request to Archbishop Desmond Tutu. So that night in the Great Hall of Parliament House, I personally passed my request to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who advised me to give it to his Media       Secretary John Allen, at the end in the front row. I did this. Exhibit 2.29
2.30
            When it was question time, I told Archbishop Desmond Tutu;- I am Alexander Buchanan, I passed you an envelope earlier. My Social, Economic, and Cultural and Civil and Political Rights are being violated. I have written a letter to the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, in fact every [838[ Member of   Parliament and 16 Police Commissioners. They have not been able to assist            me, so I was wandering if you could assist me in getting political asylum in South Africa ?"
            Archbishop Desmond Tutu said, "I only an Archbishop !"
            After this I then went and sat beside John Allen, Media Secretary to Archbishop Desmond Tutu and exchanged business cards.
           
            I provide copies of the cards John Allen and I exchanged in case my residence is mysteriously robbed, burnt or destroyed after I file this writ in the High Court. Probably as a joke to frighten or intimidate me and destroy evidence. You guessed ? The ANU Scrabble Society is my recreation marketing project.
2.31
            "The major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth, Australian National University, Pro-Vice Chancellor, for  Planning and Administration, Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy,            Cummins and Gibson (division of Sly and Wiegall) and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. In an effort to prevent the Chairman of the ANU Scrabble® Society from informing the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, of major criminal activity of an organisation he is the patron of, that is  the Australian National University Debating Society", has not succeeded.
2.32
            Has not succeeded, despite 3 restraining orders, 12 death threats, 17 arrests,  20 charges, 60 days in remand, almost 80 days in court, and over 100 appearances, going before every Magistrate and Justice of the Australian Capital Territory and I still have no convictions or record. I have won !
2.33
            And now I have informed Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir  Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, of the blatant disregard of the law of the Australian National University Debating Society. And that this may possibly place him in a slight compromising position. Please do not take it personally,  that I am now suing you for negligence, I just need your attention and help !
2.34
            These events have not occurred because, I am eccentric or have an unusual thought process'. They have occurred as I sustained severe brain damage and been unconscious for a month. This is Disability Discrimination. My Disabilities are best summed up by Neurologist Dr Gytis Danta in his letter to the ANU Countrywide co-ordinator, Liz Lowrie of 15th December 1989.

AND UPON READING IT IS FOUND THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA THE HONOURABLE SIR ANTHONY FRANK MASON AO, KBE, IS NEGLIGENT FOR,

3.0       Failure, to consider that as Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, there is a duty of care you owe to every Australian. And to breach that duty of care  by associating, affiliating and endorsing an organisation involved in major  crime, such as the Australian National University Debating Society, would compromise your position, that of the Commonwealth of Australia and most      importantly the people of the Commonwealth of Australia.
3.1      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before becoming their patron in 1989.
3.2      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1990.
3.3      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1991.
3.4      
            Failure to investigate the what the 1991 ANU Debating Society would do with     the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation,  association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.5      
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1991 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating,  associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.6
            Failure to investigate, before writing in an undated letter of early 1991.
           
            "To All Members

            As Patron of the ANU Debating Society, it gives me much pleasure to greet members of the Society who are returning to the University to continue their studies this year.
           
            Debating is an important and influential aspect of academic life in a  university. Membership of the Society provides an excellent opportunity for the discussion of a wide range of social, political, and philosophical issues affecting Australia in particular and the world in general. As well, there is the added reward of the opportunity to make lasting friendships.
           
            I wish the Society well for the coming year." Exhibit 3.6

3.7      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1992.
3.8      
            Failure to investigate the what the 1992 ANU Debating Society would do with     the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation,  association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.9      
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1992 ANU Debating Society before
            writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating,  associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.10
            Failure to investigate, before writing in a letter of 6th February 1992.
           
            "It is my pleasant task once again to write a few words of welcome to you, the members of the ANU Debating Society. Those of you who have chosen to renew your membership no doubt do so because you are aware of the many benefits to be obtained from involvement with the Society; new members will quickly realise the advantages which membership brings. Participation in extra-curricular activities adds to the enjoyment of university life and offers the opportunity to forge lasting friendships.

            As patron, I was pleased to be able to attend the Society's Annual Dinner last year and to meet some of you. I was therefore not surprised to learn of the success of the Society at the recent World Championships. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate those members who took part and to wish the society continued success in all its activities during the coming year."
                                                                                                                                                            Exhibit 3.10
3.11
            Failure to investigate, and monitor publications of the 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, ANU Debating Society, such as their monthly journal's, Inter Junket,  Splinter Junket and Year books.        
3.12
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 15th September 1992, which referred to the ANU Debating Society taking, criminal actions when I threatened to sue them for defamation, before and   after attending the annual ANU Debating Society dinner for 1992.
3.13
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times letter to editor, written by Amanda Chadwick on the 21st September 1992, which referred to serious problems of  ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey.
3.14
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 17th October 1992, clearly indicating  major criminal activity, as a direct   result of ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey making "false accusation's" and "committing perjury".
3.15
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 5th November 1992, clearly referring to conspiracy between Rachel Michelle Piercey and the Police under instructions of the ANU Debating Society. A conspiracy to prevent me proceeding with action against libel, slander and defamation after they published "puerile propaganda".
3.16    
            Failure to investigate, phone, fax or write to me to enquire about defamation,  a conspiracy and contempt by the ANU Debating Society of which you are the patron who affiliates, associates and endorses their extra-curricular activities.
3.17    
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1993.
3.18    
            Failure to investigate what the 1993 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation, association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.19    
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1993 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.20
            Failure to investigate, before writing an undated letter of early 1993.
           
            "It gives me much pleasure to once again to welcome all members of the ANU Debating Society to a new year at the University.

            Since my acceptance of the position of Patron of the Society in 1989, I have followed with great interest the Society's many successes in the world of debating. Last, year, members maintained the high standards set by their     predecessors, with Daniel Mulino achieving outstanding success at the   Thirteenth World Intervarsity Debating Championships where he was judged Best Individual Speaker. I hope that representatives of the Society will be able to reach similar heights in this year's competitions.

            Your Society is a very active organisation and I know that your administrators have planned a full calendar of events for this year. I trust you will give them your full support.
            Finally, I hope that your membership of the Society affords you the opportunity not only to improve your debating skills but to form many friendships which will endure beyond your student days." Exhibit 3.20
           
3.21
            Failure to investigate, the major criminal activity of the ANU Debating and your affiliating, associating and endorsing with and of them when I wrote to you on the 2nd of April and 30th August 1993.
3.22                
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1994.
3.23    
            Failure to investigate the what the 1994 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation,  association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.24    
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1994 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating,  associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.25
            Failure to investigate, the ANU Debating Society before writing in a letter of 6th January 1994.
           
            "As patron of the ANU Debating Society, I am pleased to write a few words of welcome to the Society and to the 1994 academic year. I hope that it will be a year which you will attain whatever goals you set for yourself and that it will be a year on which you will look back with much satisfaction. Membership of the Debating Society will no doubt contribute to your enjoyment of university life.
           
            Although my personal contact with the Society has been somewhat limited by my workload as Chief Justice of the High Court, I have nevertheless been kept well informed of its activities and achievements by your President Simon Brettel. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate all members who will be participating in the World Intervarsity Debating Championships in  Melbourne." Exhibit 3.25
3.26
            Failure to investigate, the 1992, 1993 and 1994 "extra-curricular activities" of Simon Brettel before affiliating, and associating with and endorsing him.
3.27
            By reason of negligence the plaintiff suffered injuries loss and damage particulars of which are as follows:

OF WHICH THESE PARTICULARS OF INJURIES HAVE OCCURRED
4.
            I have just outlined a very brief 7000 words of my injuries.
4.1
            I have an 80, 000 word cross examination prepared for only
            ANU Debating Society, 1994 Vice-President Rachel Michelle Piercey and her fellow student, friend and lover,
            AFP Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928
            By the time I finish preparing this complex  cross- examination it would be 100, 000 words and when I cross-examined them they would not be allowed out of custody, ie. s. 327, s.328 and s.344 of ACT Crimes Act.
            ie. multiple offences of "Perjury", "Perjury with intent to procure conviction" and "False accusation".          

            Once Piercey and Hains are convicted they will prove valuable witness' to convict 6 other ANU students, 6 other ANU Constables, ANU Selth, MCG Refshuage, MSJ Chenoweth and Magistrate Ron Cahill. Selth, Refshuage and Chenoweth for lesser offences as they only "aided and abetted" and were "accessories after the fact" and Cahill only "acted oppressively and when   interested" and went beyond his jurisdiction.

AND UPON READING AND HEARING


4.2      
            I Alexander Marcel Andrei Sebastian Barker Bailiff, of 7C   Moorhouse Street O'Connor, hereby make oath and say as follows:- I know I will be murdered, but this is the price I paid to "ensure justice and equity".  It is for this reason I provide a comprehensive Exhibit Index of documents to be subpoenaed. Please, listen to all court tapes as I have left a long trail of evidence. Examine all listed files and you will find out exactly who is responsible for my murder. I only have evidence of crime of 7 ANU Debating Society Executive, 1 ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, 7 Barristers and Solicitors - 1 also ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, 7 Australian Federal Police, 1 Chief Magistrate,     1 Psychiatrist, 1 Belconnen Remand Centre "assault " staff,  1 "Hit and Run" motorist and 6 ANU academics and staff, breaching Privacy Legislation.
4.3                                                                                                                                                       Exhibit 4.2
            I enclose four letters of the Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society and their activities. The letter of 6th February 1992, is the only evidence I needed and used to ascertain the ANU Debating Society, was an organisation not socially, politically, legally, economically, commercially, or ideologically aligned with any organisation that precludes others, or is involved in dubious activities.  If they were, the Chief Justice of the High Court  - the Honourable Sir Anthony Mason AO, KBE, would not affiliate, associate or endorse them or their activities. To inform you this way, is the only way left.
4.4
            To find who is responsible, you only need to Subpoena every Exhibit on the list, I have carefully prepared. To not find out, will only further scandalise -  the Chief Justice of the High Court, the Honourable Sir Anthony Mason AO,  KBE and his involvement with the ANU Debating Society. For not having shown the expected "duty of care" owed to investigate - before affiliating, associating and endorsing an "organisation who have a history of a blatant  disregard of the law." And is negligent in failing to cease affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society after their major criminal activity was published in the Canberra Times and I personally informed him on      numerous occasions. Thus giving the ANU Debating Society the motive to commit further major crime in efforts to prevent me, taking legal action and informing you of "their blatant disregard of the law". Which has prompted   this, 14 other High Court applications and my murder at 24.
4.5
            At least I beat my sister by 8 years, Vanessa Camille Bayliss was killed in a car accident at 16. Mother, Christine Mary Bayliss, 35 broke 19 bones and brother, Jean-Paul Lucian Bayliss, 4 broke 2 legs and was unconscious for a  day. And I just had a few lacerations, a broken arm, severe brain damage and was unconscious for a month. But we are all okay now, thanks for asking !
4.6
            I submit the ANU Scrabble Society Official Score Sheet of 1992. Four letters of the Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE. A letter of Dr Gytis Danta, Neurologist, to ANU Countrywide co- ordinator, Liz Lowrie of 15th of December 1989. A letter of Christine (Bayliss) Bates, University of Sydney - Law, to ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration of 26th November 1993. The Alexander Bailiff, ANU student #9204215, General Services Receipt of 19th January 1994. A tape with the distressing message left by the Prime Minister's office. Some of the death threats I regularly receive. And a page with "quotes" this case has prompted. You have my written permission to release these documents to      anyone from the media who requests them, before and after my murder.
4.7
            May my fight be seen, as not just one to play Scrabble®, but to achieve the 1st objective of the Australian National University Scrabble Society.          
1.         "To ensure Justice and Equity for all people and groups in society."

PARTICULARS OF CONTINUING DISCRIMINATION, IMPAIRMENT AND LOSS OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE AND LIFE DUE TO INJURIES

            (a)        These would have been supplied prior to the hearing.

PARTICULARS OF OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES AND ECONOMIC LOSS

            (a)        These would have been supplied prior to the hearing.


AND the plaintiff would claim damages, costs and interest pursuant to Order 43A  Rules 1 and 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia High Court Rules in force under the Judiciary Act 1903.

IT IS ORDERED THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA THE HONOURABLE SIR ANTHONY FRANK MASON AO, KBE,

5.0
            To use the powers invested in the Chief Justice of the High Court, appointed by  the Governor-General by commission, upon request of the Executive Council of   the Commonwealth of Australia, derived from the Australian Constitution Act.
5.1      
            Make an oral order and issue warrants, so the following people are arrested and detained in custody for Committal For Contempt of Court. Pursuant to Order 56 Rule 1 to 12 of the High Court Rules in force under the Judiciary Act 1903. And section 24 of the Judiciary Act 1903.
5.2      
            File a Mandamus, in the name of the Chief Justice of the High Court - The Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, against the Attorney-General, so that indictments and warrants for arrest are filed by the Attorney-General of the herein criminals for their herein crimes. Pursuant to Order 55 Rule 18 to 33, and Order 69 Rule 1 to 8 of the High Court Rules in force under the Judiciary Act 1903. And section 33 of the Judiciary Act 1903.

5.3
            AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY
            Simon Brettel                          1991-3 President
            Kath Cummins                        1992    Vice-President
            Tim Hughes                            1992    Treasurer
            Kirsten Edwards                     1992    Editor
            Matthew Sag                           1992    Editor
            Stella Gaha                              1992    Sponsorship Officer
            Rachel Michelle Piercey         1992    Assistant Sponsorship Officer
5.4
            AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
            Philip Alan Selth         Pro-Vice Chancellor, Planning and Administration.
            Richard Refshuage      Hired by ANU from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson.
            Chris Chenoweth        Hired by ANU from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques.
            Malcolm Brennan       Hired by ANU from Mallesons, Stephen Jacques.
            Stephen Herrick          Australian National University Legal Officer.
            Michael Helman         Hired by me from Ahern, Morris and Vincent.
            Timothy Chadwick     Hired by me from Snedden, Hall and Gallop.
5.5      
            AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE (AFP)
            Harry Thomas Hains              AFP Constable 4928
            Adrian Kraft                           AFP Constable 3260
            Kelvin George Thorn              AFP Constable 1639
            Robert Duncan                        AFP Constable 4174
            Paul Sherring                           AFP Constable 4545
            Anthony Crocker                    AFP Constable 4832
            Darren Bretherton                   AFP Constable 4997
5.6
            AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY MAGISTRATES COURT
            Ron Cahill                               Chief Magistrate
5.7      
            PSYCHIATRIST
            Dr Robert Tym                       Mackay Gardens Professional Centre.          

AND IT IS ORDERED THAT

6.0
            Honourable Sir Anthony Mason                    Chief Justice of the High Court
            Honourable Michael Lavarch                        Federal Attorney General
            Honourable Duncan Kerr                               Federal Minister for Justice
            Honourable Simon Crean                               Federal Minister for Education
            Honourable Michael Lee                                Federal Minister for Communications
            Honourable Dr Carmen Lawrence                 Federal Minister for Health
            Commissioner Michael Palmer                      Australian Federal Police
            Mrs Philippa Smith                                        Commonwealth Ombudsman
            Mr Kevin O'Connor                                       Commonwealth Privacy Commissioner
            Mrs Elizabeth Hastings                                  Disability Discrimination Commissioner
            Honourable Gareth Evans                              Minister for Foreign Affairs
            Prime Minister Paul Keating                          Commonwealth of Australia
            Professor Peter Baume                                   ANU Chancellor
            Her Majesty Elizabeth Windsor II                  Queen of Commonwealth of Australia
            Boutros Boutros Ghali                                    Secretary General of the United Nations
6.1
            To order the herein criminals to be investigated, arrested, charged, remanded, prosecuted, and sentenced for their herein criminal activity and Human Rights abuses they perpetrated against Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian  Barker Bailiff, Australian National University student #9204215,            Chairman of the Australian National University Scrabble Society in his efforts to inform the Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony MASON AO, KBE, of major criminal activity of an organisation he  affiliates, associates, and endorses with, in his capacity as their Patron.
6.2
            To be advised I, Alexander Marcel Andrei Sebastian Barker Bailiff,  Australian National University student #9204215, Australian National University Scrabble Society Chairman, will be filing one High Court application, of Mandamus, against each, as they are listed herein, on consecutive Tuesday's, commencing on Tuesday the 3rd Of January 1994. The 15th application being filed against the President of the United Nations will coincide with an application to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, being made under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966. This will also coincide with letters requesting political asylum, going to every Prime Minister and President; 2 representatives from every country on Disabled People International, who directly liaise with the United Nations General Assembly; and representatives  of 184 member States on the United Nations General Assembly.
6.3
            To advise I know my Political Liberties will be interfered with by violence, threats, intimidation, of many kinds, by people hindering and interfering with my free exercise  and performance of my political rights and duties.
6.4
            To advise I know I will be murdered before the major criminal activity, herein is exposed. And to find out by is responsible for my murder, it is necessary to subpoena each and every listed Exhibit in the "Exhibit List" I have prepared, and file with every application. See attached Exhibit.            




7.0

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THERE BE A ROYAL COMMISSION, a PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY and SENATE INQUIRY into HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES in the following areas:-

7.1
            DISABILITY and DISCRIMINATION
            Subjects of the Queen, are subject to disability and discrimination in every State, which would not be equally applicable, to subjects of the Queen, resident in such other State. In contravention to s.117 of the Australian Constitution Act.
7.2
            UNIVERSITY POWERS TO INDEMNIFY AND BE PARTIAL
            Power of Universities to indemnify and be partial to either party in staff,   student and client disputes, especially criminal partiality.
7.3
            UNIVERSITY CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY
            Abuse of legal system by Universities in the harassment of staff and students.
7.4
            LEGAL PROFESSION CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY
            Abuse of the legal system by the legal profession, in knowingly representing clients in criminal activity, breaching client confidentiality, and their own criminal activity.
7.5
            MAGISTRATES CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY
            Abuse of the legal system by Magistrates, exceeding their jurisdiction, acting  oppressively, when an interested and party and entirely defeating the principles of our legal system.
7.6
            PSYCHIATRIC CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY
            Criminal activity by the Psychiatric profession, in breaching client confidentiality, writing false medical reports - if paid, and demanding patients pay money or else a false medical report will be written.
7.7
            POLICE CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY
            Abuse of the legal system by Police in acting criminally and corruptly, and as they have a relationship with the complaint.
7.8
            OMBUDSMAN POWERS TO INVESTIGATE POLICE
            Police are not provided trial on indictment for crimes they commit, thus ensuring they escape punishment,  in contravention to s.80 of the Australian Constitution Act.
7.9
            MAGISTRATES POWERS TO ISSUE RESTRAINING ORDERS
            Applicants - Universities, Legal Profession, and Police use orders to be oppressive and further their harassment against the defendants, often criminal.
7.10
            MAGISTRATES POWERS TO REMAND FOR MINOR OFFENCES
            Magistrates remand prisoners for minor offences, thus being oppressive and  often entirely defeating the principles of our legal system.
7.11
            POLICE POWERS
            Police harass, intimidate, arrest, charge and remand people for doing things which are not summary or criminal offences. It is professionally inappropriate and a conflict of interest that Police - Internal Investigation Divisions should have powers to investigate (whitewash) Police corruption and criminality.
7.12
            POLICE AND PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
            Director of Public Prosecutions and Police Prosecutors conduct cases against people, charges not being summary or criminal offences.
7.13
            MAGISTRATE POWERS
            Magistrates preside over cases, defeat the principles of our legal system, and convict people for doing things which are not summary or criminal offences.
7.14
            COMMONWEALTH PRIVACY LEGISLATION
            Universities breach Commonwealth Privacy Legislation, this is not what the legislation is for. How widespread are Human Rights abuses with respect to Commonwealth Privacy Legislation ? What is the purpose of this Legislation ?
7.15
            MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
            Local, Territory, State and Federal Members of Parliament/Legislative Assemblies are so removed from their electorate and those outside it, they do not even respond to the people who take the time, to write letters requesting their assistance in asking them to forward a letter to the Prime Minister.
7.16
            POLITICAL LIBERTIES
            Many people, by violence, threats, intimidation of many kinds, have the free exercise or performance of their political right or duty interfered with and hindered. In contravention with s.28 of the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914.
7.17
            EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
            To ensure, the peace, order and good government, effective social justice and equity strategies and policies should be developed with appropriate Legislation passed. Where are Governments efforts to pass equity and social justice Legislation ?
7.18
            INTERNATIONAL COVENANTS
            The Human Rights enumerated by the United Nations documents, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948; International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights 1966; International Covenant on Civil
            and Political Rights 1966; and Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966; although ratified by the Commonwealth Government, are ubiquitously violated by officers of Commonwealth, States and Territories in their dealing with the subjects of the Queen, resident in any State. Confirming United Nations Human Rights Declarations and Covenants are insignificant and irrelevant to the Commonwealth, State and Territory   Governments within and of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Government not having attempted to remedy Human Rights under s.51 (xxix) or s.128  of the Australian Constitution Act, for the Human Rights of the subjects of the Queen. The  Government choosing to continue to stifle Human Rights, as are the Government powers stifled by the Commonwealth of the United Kingdom.
7.19    
            CHANGES TO UNITED KINGDOM LEGISLATION
            Commonwealth of Australia Government's have continually wasted tens of millions of dollars of subjects of the Queen, by holding referendums, inquiries,  commissions among others in efforts to change the Australian Constitution Act. When it is clear  the United Kingdom, Statute of Westminster 1931, can be revoked thus allowing the Dominion of Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, the Irish   Free State and Newfoundland to seek independence. Thus ensuring their peoples are no longer subject to alien subjugation, domination, and exploitation, constituting a denial of fundamental human rights, contrary to the Charter of the United Nations Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples 1960.
7.20    
            HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION
            Human Rights enumerated in the Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1628, Bill of Rights 1688 and Habeas Corpus Act of 1640, 1679 and 1810 is (and    was) applicable in all the colonies and countries (and former) of the United Kingdom. Despite this Human Rights violations, by Government have been and still are ubiquitous throughout the former and current colonies and countries of the Commonwealth. As imperialists counteract insecurities by subjugating, dominating, and exploiting original inhabitants, whilst indoctrinating them   with their own belief systems.
           
            The hundreds of thousands of Aborigines killed in genocide, after British,   invaded the inhabitants of Gondwanaland for the last 60,000 to 120,000 years. The pillaging, raping, and murdering of Aborigines, by the law enforcement arm of government, among others, still occurring and nothing ever really been done about it. The rich 60,000 to 120,000, year history of          Gondwanaland, denied. And reprimanding of an Aboriginal athlete for raising her peoples flag at the Commonwealth Games is minuscule evidence to indicate how negligible Human Rights are to the government. Aborigines are only one minority group, but they are the most pillaged, raped and murdered of any minority group Australia.

            The major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society and the Australian Federal Police aided by Philip Alan Selth ANU Pro- Vice Chancellor, Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson  (merged with Sly and Wiegall)  and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques, has already prompted these following remarks, among others:-

"This is a major injustice",
Christopher Murphy - Criminal Lawyer.

"I would not be surprised if
you are killed before your
next birthday."[in 3 months]
Philip W. Bates, Medical Barrister, Chelmsford Cases.

"You will definitely be killed if you expose this major criminal activity."
Alex Telman, Norm Gallagher's Barrister.

"If you keep going this way,
[to expose it] then we will,
have a murder to investigate."
Commander of Community Relations, Australian Federal Police

"I am only an Archbishop !"
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, when asked for assistance.

"It sounds more like a
Harrison Ford Movie."
Federal Member, House of Representatives.

"Write to the office."
Prime Minister, when asked for help.

            Further evidence is, even I know I will be murdered before hearings expose the major crime outlined herein. Despite having written to:-

            883      Senior officers in Australian Higher Education Institutions, 1994;
            222      Parliamentarians of 37th Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia;
            139      Parliamentarians of 50th Parliament of New South Wales;
            133      Parliamentarians of 52nd Parliament of Victoria;
              91      Parliamentarians of 34th Parliament of Western Australia;
              88      Parliamentarians of 47th Parliament of Queensland;
              69      Parliamentarians of 48th Parliament of South Australia;
              54      Parliamentarians of 42nd Parliament of Tasmania;
              25      Assembly(wo)men of 7th Assembly of Northern Territory;
              17      Assembly(wo)men of 2nd Assembly of Australian Capital Territory; 
              16      Police Commissioners, 2 in each above State and Territory;
              16      Director's of Public Prosecutions, 2 in each above State and Territory;
              16      Ombudsman's, 2 in each above State and Territory;
                8      Governor's, one in each State, Territory and Commonwealth;
            and
              69      High Commissioner's and Ambassador's posted in Canberra;
              92      Editor's of student publications, in Australian Higher Educations;
              42      Newspaper Editor's, Radio and TV Executive Producer's across Australia;

            Outlining the major criminal activity and major Human Rights Abuses, and seeking assistance, not a single Territory, State or Commonwealth higher education, political, or law enforcement officer has contacted me to investigate, that outlined herein. In fact, the first parties to contact me to provide me assistance, were from Foreign Countries, in which I am now discussing political asylum strategies. Which will prove useful when I go on the Official ANU Scrabble Society - World Political Asylum Tour's.
            Consequently, I have no other choice but to seek relief by filing this and 15 other HIGH COURT applications, exhausting domestic remedies, before one application to the United Nations Commission for Human Rights, under the OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS 1966.
           
           

DATED this Tuesday 3rd January 1995.

SWORN by the below named            )
Prosecutor, at Canberra in the            )
Australian Capital Territory,  )
this 3rd day of January 1995. )
            Signed:                                                                                     ___________________3/1/95



DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CANBERRA REGISTRY                                                                              No. H.C.     of 1995

                        BETWEEN:    Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff
                                                AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Student #9204215
                                                AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE® SOCIETY                                                                                                     Plaintiff

                                    AND:  The Honourable Sir Anthony Frank MASON AO KBE
                                                CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
                                                                                                            Defendant

            ELIZABETH THE SECOND by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and her      Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.

            TO:     The Honourable Sir Anthony Frank MASON AO KBE, Chief Justice of the          High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

            We command you, that within 21 days after the service of this Writ on you,          inclusive of the day of such service you cause an appearance to be entered for you in the High Court of Australia, Canberra Registry of the Australian Capital     Territory in an action at the suit of the Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff of 7C Moorhouse Street O'Connor ACT 2601 and the          AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE® SOCIETY.                                                                 
            And take notice, that in default of your so doing the plaintiff may proceed             therein, and judgement may be given in your absence.

            WITNESS the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason - Chief Justice of the
            High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra the 3rd day of     January 1995.

                                                                                                F. JONES
                                                                                                Registrar
           
N.B. - This writ is to be served within twelve calendar months from the date thereof, or if renewed, within six calendar months from the date of the last renewal, including the day of such date and not afterwards. The defendant (or defendants) may appear hereto by entering an appearance (or appearances) either personally or by solicitor at the Registrar's Office, Canberra.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Filed by the Plaintiff:

Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY STUDENT  # 9204215.
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE® SOCIETY          
7C Moorhouse Street                                                                                                                                                              Phone: 06 257 6234              
O'Connor                                                                                                                                                                                                     Fax:             06 257 6345
GPO Box 2958                                                                                                                                                                         Pager: 132222 #9116
Canberra ACT 2601                                                                                                                                                                Ref: HC________of 1995
                                                                                    
           

           
            This writ was served by me at____________________________________



            on the defendant personally on



                                       the ______________day of _____________1995.



            Endorsed on the ______________day of _____________1995.

           

            Signed: Alexander Marcel Andri Sebastian Barker Bailiff
                                    AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Student # 9204215
                                    AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE® SOCIETY                                                    
           

            Signature:........................................................................................................
           
           

            Address:          7C Moorhouse Street
                                    O'Connor
                                    GPO Box 2958
                                    Canberra ACT 2601
                                    Phone:- 06 257 6234
                                    Fax:-    06 257 6345
                                    Pager:- 132222 #9116








STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1.        
            I, Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff, of 7C Moorhouse Street O'Connor in the Australian Capital Territory, student #9204215 at the Australian National University ("ANU")  and Chairman of the ANU Scrabble Society make oath and say as follows:-
1.1      
            I was born, on the day Gough Whitlam, Leader of the Opposition, threatened to block supply in the Senate, that is Tuesday the 25th of August 1970, an event leading up to the constitutional crisis of 1975. My life began, amidst controversy, and is polemic, pleonastic and serendipitious. My idiosyncrasies determine the path in life, I have chosen to passionately, pursue.
1.2      
            I am, Alexander Marcel Andre Sebastian Barker Bailiff, an eccentric, who has an unusual thought process'. I am a sui generis social,political, legal, economic, commercial, and ideological, theory exculpator. I am,  a P.L.E.C.I.T.E. and exceptionally industrious and resourceful, effectively       utilising any resources available. My favourite pursuit, apart from developing  P.L.E.C.I.T.E. strategies, is playing Scrabble®. Exhibit 1.1
1.3      
            I am, the Chairman of the Australian National University Scrabble® Society.
1.4      
            I am, appointed by the ANU Scrabble® Society, to make this Affidavit.
1.5      
            I am, duly authorised by the ANU Scrabble® Society to act in any proceedings, presentations or performance necessary to ensure achieving the:-
                          'Aims and Objectives' of the ANU Scrabble® Society.

1.6
            The '"Aims and Objectives" of The ANU Scrabble® Society are to:-
1.7      
            Ensure justice and equity for all people and groups in society.
1.8      
            Develop interpersonal skills between people and groups of differing views
            and interests through a range of pleasurable mediums.
1.9      
            Develop our vocabulary and enhance the use of words in everyday life.
1.10    
            Develop self awareness in both personal and career "Aims and Objectives".
1.11    
            Enjoy simultaneously achieving our and these "Aims and Objectives".
1.12    
            The Chairman is generally to have power to do anything to achieve the 'Aims
            and Objectives' of the Society - subject to the provisions of this constitution 
            and Commonwealth Legislation passed via The Australian Constitution Act
2.        
            The major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth, Australian National University, Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy,  Cummins and Gibson (division of Sly and Wiegall) and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. In an effort to prevent me, the Chairman of the ANU Scrabble® Society from informing the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia,           of major criminal activity of an organisation he is the Patron of, being the Australian National University Debating Society.

2.1
            In 1992 ANU Debating Society, President - Simon Brettel, Vice President -  Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor - Kirsten Edwards, Editor -  Matthew Sag, and Sponsorship Officer - Stella Gaha did, "conspire to commit  crimes", "incite and encourage", "aid and abet", and be an "accessory after the fact", to criminal activity of Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle         Piercey. Exhibit 2.1
2.2      
            ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey did "attempt, "conspire to bring false accusation", "conspire to defeat justice",  "attempt to pervert justice", "fabricate evidence", circulate "defamatory documents ", make "untrue representations", make "false accusations", "give false testimony", "commit perjury", and "perjury with the intent to procure           conviction". Exhibit 2.2
2.3
            ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Pierceywas also "incited and encouraged", and "aided and abetted" by her fellow student, friend and lover Australian Federal Police ("AFP") Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928, responsible for 5 arrests of in 48 days. And Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928 was "aided and abetted" by Constable Adrian Kraft      3260. Exhibit 2.3
2.4
            The Chief Magistrate Ron Cahill, presided over proceeding's in which he went beyond his jurisdiction and "acted oppressively and was an interested party".  I was remanded from the 8th of September to 16th of October 1992 for a  "false accusation" that I telephoned Rachel Michelle Piercey, in breach of  Interim Restraining Order 1992/279, which expired 14 days before I was    arrested by Rachel Michelle Piercey's fellow student, friend and lover AFP Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928. I was released 2 days after the  Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court, attended the annual ANU Debating Society dinner at the ANU, as their       Patron. Exhibit 2.4
2.5
            In 1992, ANU Debating Society Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle            Piercey's distinct pattern of behaviour was to circulate "defamatory    documents", "fabricate evidence" make a "false accusation" of "threat to kill",  get a restraining order then make "false accusations" of breaching the order.
            Exhibit 2.5
2.6
            The ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration ("P&A"), Philip Alan Selth hired his General Services Fee committee colleague - Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson to representRachel Michelle Piercey after she "fabricated evidence" and submitted it to him on the 28th July 1992. Exhibit 2.6
2.7
            Over 104 days, from the 22nd July until the 4th November 1992, efforts of:-
            Australian National University Debating Society, President - Simon     Brettel, Vice President - Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor - Kirsten Edwards, Editor - Matthew Sag, Sponsorship Officer - Stella Gaha and Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey.
            Australian National University Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth and any lawyers, academic's, staff and students acting under his advice. ie. Gavin Lee, for Rachel Michelle Piercey.
            Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson ("MCG") - Richard Refshuage hired for Rachel Michelle Piercey by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor - Philip Alan Selth.
            Malleson, Stephen and Jacques ("MSJ") -  Chris Chenoweth hired by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, P&A - Philip Alan Selth, for himself.
            Australian Federal Police - Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928, Constable Martin Leonard 4169, Constable Rebecca Louise McNevin 5038, Constable Adrian Kraft 3260, Senior Constable John Reynolds 2830, Constable Wesley James Herold 3874, Constable Michael Perriman 3297,  and Constable Pugh.
            ACT Legal Aid Office - Ms Crebbins, Kate Hughes - Ken Archer's defacto and fiance' and solicitor Gavin Lee representing Rachel Michelle Piercey's.
            ACT Director of Public Prosecutions -  Ken Archer, Michael Chilcott, Pat  De Veau, Cooke, Alison Chivers, Amanda Tonkin, Fiona Merrylees.
            ACT Magistrates Court -  Michael Somes, Peter Dingwall, Michael Ward, Warren Nicholl, John Murphy, Ron Cahill, John Dainer, John Burns.
            ACT Corrective Services -  Director and staff of Belconnen Remand Centre.
            resulted in:-
            reluctantly issuing an interim restraining order, 5 arrests, 7 charges, 38 court  appearances, 22 days in court, 55 days in remand and 4 convictions, being released 2 days after the Annual Debating Society End of Year Dinner.
            Exhibit 2.7
2.8      
            During this period Christine and Philip Bates came to Canberra and had discussions about me and regarding my studies, with ANU, Disability Adviser  - Margaret Miller, Counsellor - Leila Bailey, Lecturer - Dr Mac Boot, Lecturer - David Adams, Tutor - Lorraine Elliott and possibly lecturer - Harry Geddes and others. The ANU  being in contravention of the Commonwealth Privacy          Act, as at no stage did I give written or oral permission to any of these academics or staff to speak to my parents. When I asked ANU Pro-Vice    Chancellor about the ANU "Statement to student's on Confidentiality of Personal Information" of 2nd February 1993, he told me he had written it. I    further asked him about the ANU breaching my confidentiality, by speaking   to my parents with out my permission, he told me "the ANU does not breach confidentiality, except in extenuating circumstances." Exhibit 2.8
2.9
            Christine and Philip Bates, Peter Bayliss and I had a meeting with psychiatrist  - Dr Robert Tym. At this meeting Dr Robert Tym reassured my parents, "your son is not abnormal, he is normal, just unusual." At a later stage solicitor,  Michael Helman told me he would get me off the charge on grounds of insanity. When I interjected, saying "but I am not !" Michael Helman, told me not to worry as he had offered Dr Tym $400 from legal aid to write such a report. Ironically, when I again met Dr Tym, he told me, "he had been offered $400 to write a report saying I suffered from delusion and paranoia." When I told Dr Tym, "I had neither given Michael Helman or Dr Tym permission to         breach my confidentiality" he said, "it does not matter". When I told Dr Tym,  "I had sacked Michael Helman." Dr Tym told me "Michael Helman asked for it before I sacked him." So I told him, "that is not what you told my parent's." Dr Tym then told me, "I have changed my mind and absolutely nothing is going to stop me writing this report unless you give me $400." I told him, "my        stepfather is currently suing psychiatrists in the Chelmsford cases and I am sure suing you for 'demand accompanied by threat' will be small fry." After this I was taken away by Remand Centre Officers to my next appointment  with Dr Shihoff, my GP. I told Dr Shihoff, "Dr Tym made a demand          accompanied by threat to me" and explained in detail. Dr Tym rang up 40 minutes later to tell Dr Shihoff "that he would not write a report unless I gave him full written permission".

            About this time, I was multiple "assaulted", by Belconnen Remand Centre,  staff member Tony Gould.  Michael Helman, walked out of Court, sticking his fingers up, refusing to give evidence of him breaching client confidentiality, after he had given evidence of how solicitor - Tim Chadwick had breached my client confidentiality. Dr Tym did worse things when he was in court in 1994 !      Exhibit 2.9
2.10
            In 1993, I had various meeting with ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, also a barrister and solicitor, regarding the ANU having hired Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson for Rachel Michelle Piercey, her "fabricated evidence", "untrue representations" and "false accusations". Another  "false accusation" was made when I was with Philip Alan Selth and days later Rachel Michelle Piercey "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false  accusation" of threat to kill, against another male student - Tjarda Strienstra.
            Exhibit 2.10
2.11
            Upon  me informing Philip Alan Selth of this, he had an urgent meeting the  next morning with Rachel Michelle Piercey. More importantly, Philip Alan Selth, became an "accessory after the fact" as he now knew what I had told him was true. So Philip Alan Selth, started having me arrested for trespass when I was found "reading in the library", on four occasions. It has been     proven that I was reading in the library with no reasonable excuse. I have no conviction and no record. I will win the Supreme Court appeal. Exhibit 2.11
2.12
            ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth then, got a restraining order to keep me off the entire ANU. ANU - Philip Alan Selth, ANU legal officer - Stephen Herrick, MCG - Richard Refshuage, MSJ Chris Chenoweth and Malcolm Brennan, and Barrister - John Purnell appeared, over nine days before 5 Magistrates, against unrepresented me. This was after MCG Richard Refshuage, had asked me "would you like to cut a deal ?", upon me showing him proof of Rachel Michelle Piercey's criminal activity. And after, ANU Law lecturer - Harry Geddes, gave crucial evidence in the Magistrates Court, establishing he saw Rachel Michelle Piercey's "fabricated evidence", quite as few later than she alleged giving it to him in a second   piece of "fabricated evidence" of the 28th July 1992. Having "fabricated     evidence" to provide Philip Alan Selth reasons to hire Richard Refshuage of Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson for Rachel Michelle Piercey. Philip Alan Selth panicked and applied for his restraining order the day after Rachel Michelle Piercey 's restraining order expired. For the purpose of preventing me subpoenaing, other ANU witness, who can provide further evidence of criminal activity of Philip Alan Selth and Rachel Michelle Piercey. Exhibit 2.12
2.13
            ANU Debating Society Rachel Michelle Piercey's, distinct pattern of behaviour had surfaced again as she, "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" of "threat to kill", against another innocent male student. ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, Philip Alan Selth further    established a link between the ANU his and Rachel Michelle Piercey legal action and more importantly criminal activity. Exhibit 2.13
2.14
            In 1993, I was "commonly assaulted" by Constable Kelvin George Thorn 1639,  as he "inflicted actual bodily harm" and told his younger colleagues I had been harassing a Canadian woman, [being Rachel Michelle Piercey]. Witnessed by Constable Robert Duncan 4174, Constable Paul Sherring 4545, Constable Anthony Crocker 4832, and Constable Darren Bretherton 4997. I was charged with "assault" and "resisting arrest" after Constable Kelvin George Thorn 1639,           "fabricated evidence" for all four and "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" all four to make a "false accusation", "commit perjury" and "perjury with the intent to procure conviction". All gave evidence witnessing me "assault" and "resist arrest". After giving evidence, they were told I had just dislocated my collarbone, weeks earlier. At trial, Justice Gallop, advised me, to "never take on the police as they will always win" as he gave me no conviction and no record. I will be acquitted in the Federal Court appeal.

            I told Chief Magistrate - Ron Cahill, how Rachel Michelle Piercey and Constable Harry Thomas 4928, knew when I was home before they made false accusations. ie. telephoning, if I answer I am home. I also told Ron Cahill of my fears for my safety. Expressing concerns of me being hit by a car. I was hit by YDA - 107, at 3:25 pm on 19th November 1992, whilst on a footpath, before        the motorist said, "serves you right and drove away". This was a deliberate "hit and run" and witnessed by:- Darren Thomas 5 Bennett Place Spence 258 6608, Chris 61 Cuthbert Circuit Wanniassa 231 2625 and Adam 62 Adolf Street Tuggeranong. Motorist was chased and he is Stephen Riley of 16 Miller  Street O'Connor ACT 2601, Licence number 279865. When Police came the         female helped me, and the male threatened to charge me, near home and when he met me at Calvary hospital. I dislocated my collarbone, seeing Dr Wright at Calvary Hospital and Dr Shihoff at Lyneham Medical Centre.
            Exhibit 2.14
2.15
            On the 27th of July 1993, it took me 4 hours and 39 minutes to be acquitted on appeal of 4 convictions. On the basis, "the way the cases have been conducted in the Magistrates Court entirely defeated the principles of our legal system." To quote Justice Gallop. Despite this, and the fact the swift dismissal of these charges was well known through legal and police circles. I was still arrested at 0040 hours on the 9th of March 1994 for "failure to pay three $100 fines." Sergeant Hall tried to explain as he apologised and let me go, although he could not explain why the last four times I had been arrested, AFP let me go from 45 minutes to 3 hours later, without charging me. My  fears, have resulted in me hiding for my own peace and safety. Exhibit 2.15
2.16
            ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth       enlisted the assistance of the 1,200 academic, 2,200 technical and general staff, and more than 10, 500 students of which 2, 400 are from 60 countries ,  of the ANU in his, Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson- Richard Refshuage,  Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques - Chris Chenoweth, and ANU Debating Society   efforts to silence and prevent me subpoenaing witness' to expose their major criminal activity. As I did subpoena ANU Law lecturer - Harry Geddes, before giving crucial evidence. On the 26th of November 1993, my mother Christine Bates wrote to the Chancellor, Pro-Vice Chancellor and members of the ANU Council providing them advice on these scandalous matters. Exhibit 2.16
2.17
            In 1994, at the XIV Worlds Debating Universities Debating Championship ANUDebating Society 1992, President - Simon Brettel, Vice President - Kath Cummins and Treasurer - Tim Hughes used the distinct pattern of behaviour  they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to use in 1992 and 1993. President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President -           Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes  "circulated defamatory documents", "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" [of] that I  "threatened to kill" them. So much so, Michael Gronow - Chief Adjudicator of  Melbourne University Debating Society organising committee, announced, to hall of contestants from 100 universities from 20 nations, "that the tournament had been delayed for half an hour as the ANU Debating Society had caused a security scare by saying someone had threatened to kill them. And it had been established that it was only a practical joke and that if the ANU Debating Society further delayed the tournament the organising committee would officially 'threaten to kill them'. Exhibit 2.17
2.18
            ANU Debating Society Rachel Michelle Piercey's, distinct pattern of behaviour surfaced again when President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President - Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes,  circulated "defamatory documents",  "fabricated evidence" and made a "false accusation" that I "threatened to kill" them. They used this distinct pattern of behaviour since they were well          acquainted with it as they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and    abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to do the same in 1992 and 1993. The reason they did not again "incite and encourage" and "aid and abet" Rachel Michelle    Piercey to use it in 1994, is because she was not at the XIV World Universities Debating Championships, as they were held in Melbourne. Exhibit 2.18
2.19
            When I rang Canberra AFP Internal Investigations Division, I told Detective Superintendent Ed Hadzic of isolating ANU Debating Society, President - Simon Brettel, Vice-President - Kath Cummins, and Treasurer - Tim Hughes, using  the distinct pattern of behaviour they had "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abetted" Rachel Michelle Piercey to use in 1992 and 1993. They           did this by circulating "defamatory documents", "fabricating evidence" and making a "false accusation" of "threat to kill". After I told AFP Internal Investigations Division, (AFP Public Relations - Whitewasher) Detective Superintendent Ed Hadzic of this good news, he said "it was only a joke !"  As he twice sent me this, his response does not surprise me. Exhibit 2.19
2.20
            As ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, successfully got a restraining order keeping me off all property of the ANU including all of it's halls and colleges of residence, I was unable to go on campus to pay my ANU 1994 General Services Fee for Re-Enrolling    Undergraduates. So I had a friend pay this for me, student number 9204215,          by presenting St. George Cheque number 187173, at 16:19 hours in exchange for receipt number 28016. This cheque was paid by St George Bank on  the 20th of January 1994. I presented ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, Philip Alan Selth a completed course enrolment form in Magistrate Court hearing RO 93/494, in December 1993, see Exhibit's.  I also sent one by certified mail, item H177494,  to the Enrolment and Fees office on the 13th of December 1993.  This postage of $1.85 was paid for by St. George Cheque number 801997. I think it would be unreasonable, although not unlikely,  if the ANU have failed me in these courses for failure to submit essay's and complete exams. Exhibit 2.20
2.21
            On Tuesday the 25th of August 1994, I wrote a letter seeking assistance.
            This letter has gone to 883 senior officers in Australian higher education; 222         Commonwealth, 139 New South Wales, 133 Victorian, 91 Western Australian,    88 Queensland, 69 South Australian, and 54 Tasmanian, members of parliament; 25 Northern Territorian, and 17 Australian Capital Territory member of the Legislative Assembly; 16 Police Commissioners; 16             Director's of Public Prosecutions; 16 Ombudsman; 7 Governor's and 1 Governor-General; 69 High Commissions and Embassies seeking political asylum; 92 Editor's of student publications in Higher education; 42 newspaper editor's and radio and television executive producer's of capital cities across Australia. Exhibit 2.21
2.22
            At my unofficial meeting with the Honourable Prime Minister of Australia, Paul John Keating, on the 2nd of September 1994, I told him I was having a major problem and he suggested I "write to the office". I did that same night, as I did on the 1st of August and I have not received a single response, except Justice Michael Kirby. I personalised, printed and framed an inspirational poem I wrote, for Paul Keating, the Honourable Prime Minister. I hoped these good thoughts of mine, might charm him and be appreciated upon his wall. I gave it to Deana, the Prime Minister's receptionist, who placed it upon his wall. Paul Keating, apparently "once" looked at it. Ironically, Deana and I, first actually met when I asked her if she would like to join the ANU Scrabble            Society in 1992. Exhibit 2.22
2.23
            On the 25th of September 1994, I wrote a letter to all 16 Ombudsman, with a complaint and enclosing a list of 1980 public officers.
            "The purpose of this letter is to make a complaint against each and every name on the enclosed list. Please investigate those, within your jurisdiction, and remit those that are not to the relevant Ombudsman, for investigation."
            I already know one Ombudsman, who personally wrote back, either did not read my full "1" page letter, or has no understanding of what is within his jurisdiction. Maybe, I should s.75 (v) of the Constitution Act him. Exhibit 2.23
2.24
                  On the 7th of October 1994, at 0900 hours I delivered two trunks of 1777 letters for Commonwealth and State officers, to the Prime Minister office. To my surprise, I got a message that distressed me more, than the death threats regularly left on my answering machine.
            "Alexander, it is Ann Mcfarlane from the Prime Ministers office and I have two suitcases full of letters, which I suppose - or I think you may want us to send out, we don't send out letter's like this, - um if they are not collected   today we will have to get them destroyed."
            To think, it was only the 8th of December 1994, Paul Keating said:-
            "But, we are guided by the thing that always guides us and that is if people are in trouble, no matter where they are from or who they vote for, let me say that, we are there to give them a hand."
            Fortunately, trunks Albert and Bill, were able to secretly get asylum in another Federal member's office, until I unleashed the 77 bundles of envelopes through some 53 members, for their electorate offices. The bundles must be well received, as I have only had four sent back to me. I know many members distributed them to institutions in their electorates. I even know some Federal member's have actually read, at least, the first letter - thanks !
            Exhibit 2.24

2.25
            As I had regularly written to the ANU Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Yeend, often  simply asking for him to dismiss ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth, before he further implicates the ANU. I was quite shocked by his untimely death. All 1980 public officers I had written to were even provided a copy of a letter I wrote to Sir Geoffrey Yeend of the 1st       of August 1994. 1777 I had delivered to the Prime Minister's office only days before. As I had great respect for Sir Geoffrey Yeend, a great "people person",  I felt the least I could do was attend his memorial at University House. Shortly after my arrival, I was approached, threatened and intimidated by ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor Philip Alan Selth. I asked him to leave me in peace as I was trying to attend a memorial service. As he did not, I placed my bike lock around my leg, and a chain around my waist to a rail I was beside. I was arrested the next day and charged twice for breach of the restraining order. One because I went to the memorial, and another because I checked my ANU Post Office Box and then chained myself to a statue outside the Chancellery at the student occupation. Magistrate Michael Somes remanded me for two weeks, as he feared I might re offend by going on the ANU again. 
These charges will be heard early in 1995. Exhibit 2.25
2.26    
            On the 10th of November 1994, at 1900 hours, I had a meeting with ANU Debating Society President of '91, 92, 93 - Simon Brettel, at Conflict Resolution Service. Simon Brettel, told me "Rachel [Michelle] Piercey has been a good friend of mine for about 4 years" and "became a [1992] committee member at the beginning of the year". This is evidence proving Rachel Michelle Piercey          "committed perjury" on the 6th of August and 4th September 1992. I told Simon Brettel the significance of Rachel Michelle Piercey making "untrue representations", "fabricating evidence", and making "false accusations" within a short period of time of me informing Simon Brettel of letters to the Chief Justice of the High Court, re:- crime of ANU Debating Society. I gave Simon Brettel 3 letters, 2 information pages and my business card, advising they   have been distributed nationally. Simon Brettel gave me his word that he   would not show or tell Rachel Michelle Piercey or anyone. In a matter of days,  Rachel Michelle Piercey "fabricated evidence", made a "false accusation" and            "committed perjury" when applying for a restraining order. After it is served upon me Rachel Michelle Piercey will make more "false accusation's". I will then be arrested, "assaulted" by police and  remanded.
2.27
            The ANU Public Affairs Division invited a friend and I, to attend the ANU Installation of Chancellor Ceremony and the Conferring of an Honorary Degree of Doctor of Laws. I rang ANU Council Member and Shadow Minister for SocialSecurity, Philip Maxwell Ruddock to inquire about me attending in safety   from ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Philip Alan Selth. Philip Maxwell Ruddock, suggested I get a personal invitation from Professor Peter Baume. My friend and I wrote a letter to Professor Peter Baume which we faxed. I did not get a personal invitation, so I did not go for fear of my safety. My seat, J19 in Llewellyn Hall, remained empty while   Professor Peter Baume was installed as Chancellor of the Australian National  University and Professor Geoffrey Brennan presented an Honorary Doctorate of Laws, which was conferred upon Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Exhibit 2.27
2.28
            As my rights, enumerated in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 are being violated by the major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian     Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth Australian National University Pro-Vice ChancellorRichard Refshuage from Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson, (merged with Sly and Wiegall)  and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. And I am arbitrarily arrested on a regular basis, I have death threats on a regular basis,  I have been hit by one car - whilst on a footpath - only dislocating my collarbone, I fear for my life and my life is in danger. I will ask Archbishop             Desmond Tutu to assist me in getting political asylum in South Africa.
2.29    
            So I wrote a letter to Archbishop Desmond Tutu seeking political asylum in South Africa. I faxed this letter to the office of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, South African High Commission and Arch Deacon Oliphant of St john's, Archbishop Desmond Tutu's Australian guide. I asked each of them if they            could pass on my request for assistance in seeking political asylum in South  Africa, but no one would pass my request to Archbishop Desmond Tutu. So that night in the Great Hall of Parliament House, I personally passed my request to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who advised me to give it to his Media Secretary John Allen, at the end in the front row. I did this. Exhibit 2.29
2.30
            When it was question time, I told Archbishop Desmond Tutu;- I am Alexander Bailiff, I passed you an envelope earlier. My Social, Economic, and Cultural and Civil and Political Rights are being violated. I have written a letter to the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, in fact every [838[ Member of   Parliament and 16 Police Commissioners. They have not been able to assist            me, so I was wandering if you could assist me in getting political asylum in South Africa ?"
            Archbishop Desmond Tutu said, "I only an Archbishop !"
            After this I then went and sat beside John Allen, Media Secretary to Archbishop Desmond Tutu and exchanged business cards.
           
            I provide copies of the cards John Allen and I exchanged in case my residence is mysteriously robbed, burnt or destroyed after I file this writ in the High Court. Probably as a joke to frighten or intimidate me and destroy evidence.  
             You guessed ? The ANU Scrabble Society is my recreation marketing project.
2.31
            "The major criminal activity of the Australian National University Debating Society, and the Australian Federal Police, aided by Philip Alan Selth, Australian National University, Pro-Vice Chancellor, for Planning and Administration, Richard Refshuage from Macphillamy,            Cummins and Gibson (division of Sly and Wiegall) and Chris Chenoweth from Mallesons, Stephen and Jacques. In an effort to prevent the   Chairman of the ANU Scrabble® Society from informing the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, - Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, of major criminal activity of an organisation he is the patron of, that is  the Australian National University Debating Society", has not succeeded.
2.32
            Has not succeeded, despite 3 restraining orders, 12 death threats, 17 arrests,  20 charges, 60 days in remand, almost 80 days in court, and over 100 appearances, going before every Magistrate and Justice of the Australian Capital Territory and I still have no convictions or record. I have won !
2.33
            And now I have informed Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, of the blatant disregard of the law of the Australian National University Debating Society. And that this may possibly place him in a slight compromising position. Please do not take it personally, that I am now suing you for negligence, I just need your attention and help !
2.34
            These events have not occurred because, I am eccentric or have an unusual thought process'. They have occurred as I sustained severe brain damage and been unconscious for a month. This is Disability Discrimination. My Disabilities are best summed up by Neurologist Dr Gytis Danta in his letter to the ANU Countrywide co-ordinator, Liz Lowrie of 15th December 1989.

AND UPON READING IT IS FOUND THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA THE HONOURABLE SIR ANTHONY FRANK MASON AO, KBE, IS NEGLIGENT FOR,

3.0       Failure, to consider that as Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, there is a duty of care you owe to every Australian. And to breach that duty of care by associating, affiliating and endorsing an organisation involved in major crime, such as the Australian National University Debating Society, would compromise your position, that of the Commonwealth of Australia and most      importantly the people of the Commonwealth of Australia.
3.1      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before becoming their patron in 1989.
3.2      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1990.
3.3      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1991.
3.4      
            Failure to investigate the what the 1991 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation, association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.5      
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1991 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.6
            Failure to investigate, before writing in an undated letter of early 1991.
           
            "To All Members

            As Patron of the ANU Debating Society, it gives me much pleasure to greet members of the Society who are returning to the University to continue their studies this year.
           
            Debating is an important and influential aspect of academic life in a university. Membership of the Society provides an excellent opportunity for the discussion of a wide range of social , political, and philosophical issues affecting Australia in particular and the world in general. As well, there is the   added reward of the opportunity to make lasting friendships.
           
            I wish the Society well for the coming year." Exhibit 3.6

3.7      
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1992.
3.8      
            Failure to investigate the what the 1992 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation, association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.9      
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1992 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.10
            Failure to investigate, before writing in a letter of 6th February 1992.
           
            "It is my pleasant task once again to write a few words of welcome to you, the members of the ANU Debating Society. Those of you who have chosen to renew your membership no doubt do so because you are aware of the many benefits to be obtained from involvement with the Society; new members will quickly realise the advantages which membership brings. Participation in extra-curricular activities adds to the enjoyment of university life and offers the opportunity to forge lasting friendships.

            As patron, I was pleased to be able to attend the Society's Annual Dinner last year and to meet some of you. I was therefore not surprised to learn of the success of the Society at the recent World Championships. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate those members who took part and to wish the society continued success in all its activities during the coming year."
                                                                                                                                                            Exhibit 3.10
3.11
            Failure to investigate, and monitor publications of the 1991, 1992, 1993,    1994, ANU Debating Society, such as their monthly journal's, Inter Junket, Splinter Junket and Year books.        
3.12
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 15th September 1992, which referred to the ANU Debating Society taking, criminal actions when I threatened to sue them for defamation, before and   after attending the annual ANU Debating Society dinner for 1992.
3.13
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times letter to editor, written by Amanda Chadwick on the 21st September 1992, which referred to serious problems of ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship Officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey.
3.14
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 17th October 1992, clearly indicating  major criminal activity, as a direct   result of ANU Debating Society, Assistant Sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey making "false accusation's" and "committing perjury".
3.15
            Failure to investigate, the Canberra Times article by Michael Bachelard, of 5th November 1992, clearly referring to conspiracy between Rachel Michelle Piercey and the Police under instructions of the ANU Debating Society. A conspiracy to prevent me proceeding with action against libel, slander and defamation after they published "puerile propaganda".
3.16    
            Failure to investigate, phone, fax or write to me to enquire about defamation, a conspiracy and contempt by the ANU Debating Society of which you are the patron who affiliates, associates and endorses their extra-curricular activities.
3.17    
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1993.
3.18    
            Failure to investigate what the 1993 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation, association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.19    
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1993 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.20
            Failure to investigate, before writing an undated letter of early 1993.
           
            "It gives me much pleasure to once again to welcome all members of the ANU Debating Society to a new year at the University.

            Since my acceptance of the position of Patron of the Society in 1989, I have followed with great interest the Society's many successes in the world of debating. Last, year, members maintained the high standards set by their predecessors, with Daniel Mulino achieving outstanding success at the   Thirteenth World Intervarsity Debating Championships where he was judged Best Individual Speaker. I hope that representatives of the Society will be able to reach similar heights in this year's competitions.

            Your Society is a very active organisation and I know that your administrators have planned a full calendar of events for this year. I trust you will give them your full support.
            Finally, I hope that your membership of the Society affords you the opportunity not only to improve your debating skills but to form many friendships which will endure beyond your student days." Exhibit 3.20
           
3.21
            Failure to investigate, the major criminal activity of the ANU Debating and your affiliating, associating and endorsing with and of them when I wrote to you on the 2nd of April and 30th August 1993.
3.22                
            Failure to investigate the activities of the ANU Debating Society before remaining their patron in 1994.
3.23    
            Failure to investigate the what the 1994 ANU Debating Society would do with the letter, you wrote to them, publicly, declaring your affiliation, association and endorsement of the ANU Debating Society and their activities.
3.24    
            Failure to investigate, the activities of the 1994 ANU Debating Society before writing, any letter on High Court of Australia letterhead, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society.
3.25
            Failure to investigate, the ANU Debating Society before writing in a letter of 6th January 1994.
           
            "As patron of the ANU Debating Society, I am pleased to write a few words of welcome to the Society and to the 1994 academic year. I hope that it will be a year which you will attain whatever goals you set for yourself and that it will be a year on which you will look back with much satisfaction. Membership of the Debating Society will no doubt contribute to your enjoyment of university life.
           
            Although my personal contact with the Society has been somewhat limited by my workload as Chief Justice of the High Court, I have nevertheless been kept well informed of its activities and achievements by your President Simon Brettel. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate all members who will be participating in the World Intervarsity Debating Championships in             Melbourne." Exhibit 3.25
3.26
            Failure to investigate, the 1992, 1993 and 1994 "extra-curricular activities" of Simon Brettel before affiliating, and associating with and endorsing him.
3.27
            By reason of negligence the plaintiff suffered injuries loss and damage particulars of which are as follows:

OF WHICH THESE PARTICULARS OF INJURIES HAVE OCCURRED
4.
            I have just outlined a very brief 7000 words of my injuries.
4.1
            I have an 80, 000 word cross examination prepared for only
            ANU Debating Society, 1994 Vice-President Rachel Michelle Piercey and her fellow student, friend and lover,
            AFP Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928
            By the time I finish preparing this complex  cross- examination it would be 100, 000 words and when I cross-examined them they would not be allowed out of custody, ie. s. 327, s.328 and s.344 of ACT Crimes Act.
            ie. multiple offences of "Perjury", "Perjury with intent to procure conviction" and "False accusation".          

            Once Piercey and Hains are convicted they will prove valuable witness' to ' convict 6 other ANU students, 6 other ANU Constables, ANU Selth, MCG Refshuage, MSJ Chenoweth and Magistrate Ron Cahill. Selth, Refshuage and Chenoweth for lesser offences as they only "aided and abetted" and were "accessories after the fact" and Cahill only "acted oppressively and when   interested" and went beyond his jurisdiction.

AND UPON READING AND HEARING


4.2      
            I Alexander Marcel Andrei Sebastian Barker Bailiff, of 7C   Moorhouse Street O'Connor, hereby make oath and say as follows:- I know I will be murdered, but this is the price I paid to "ensure justice and equity".  It is for this reason I provide a comprehensive Exhibit Index of documents to be subpoenaed. Please, listen to all court tapes as I have left a long trail of evidence. Examine all listed files and you will find out exactly who is responsible for my murder. I only have evidence of crime of 7 ANU Debating Society Executive, 1 ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, 7 Barristers and Solicitors - 1 also ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor, 7 Australian Federal Police, 1 Chief Magistrate,     1 Psychiatrist, 1 Belconnen Remand Centre "assault " staff,  1 "Hit and Run" motorist and 6 ANU academics and staff, breaching Privacy Legislation.
4.3                                                                                                                                                       Exhibit 4.2
            I enclose four letters of the Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE, affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society and their activities. The letter of 6th February 1992, is the only evidence I needed and used to ascertain the ANU Debating Society, was an organisation not socially, politically, legally, economically, commercially, or ideologically aligned with any organisation that precludes others, or is involved in dubious activities.  If they were, the Chief Justice of the High Court  - the Honourable Sir Anthony Mason AO, KBE, would not affiliate, associate or endorse them or their activities. To inform you this way, is the only way left.
4.4
            To find who is responsible, you only need to Subpoena every Exhibit on the list, I have carefully prepared. To not find out, will only further scandalise  -  the Chief Justice of the High Court, the Honourable Sir Anthony Mason AO,  KBE and his involvement with the ANU Debating Society. For not having shown the expected "duty of care" owed to investigate - before affiliating,associating and endorsing an "organisation who have a history of a blatant disregard of the law." And is negligent in failing to cease affiliating, associating and endorsing the ANU Debating Society after their major criminal activity was published in the Canberra Times and I personally informed him on numerous occasions. Thus giving the ANU Debating Society the motive to commit further major crime in efforts to prevent me, taking legal action and informing you of "their blatant disregard of the law". Which has prompted   this, 14 other High Court applications and my murder at 24.
4.5
            At least I beat my sister by 8 years, Vanessa Camille Bayliss was killed in a car accident at 16. Mother, Christine Mary Bayliss, 35 broke 19 bones and brother, Jean-Paul Lucian Bayliss, 4 broke 2 legs and was unconscious for a day. And I just had a few lacerations, a broken arm, severe brain damage and was unconscious for a month. But we are all okay now, thanks for asking !
4.6
            I submit the ANU Scrabble Society Official Score Sheet of 1992. Four letters of the Chief Justice of the High Court - the Honourable Sir Anthony Frank Mason AO, KBE. A letter of Dr Gytis Danta, Neurologist, to ANU Countrywide co- ordinator, Liz Lowrie of 15th of December 1989. A letter of Christine (Bayliss) Bates, University of Sydney - Law, to ANU Pro-Vice Chancellor for Planning and Administration of 26th November 1993. The Alexander Bailiff, ANU student #9204215, General Services Receipt of 19th January 1994. A tape with the distressing message left by the Prime Minister's office. Some of the death threats I regularly receive. And a page with "quotes" this case has prompted. You have my written permission to release these documents to      anyone from the media who requests them, before and after my murder.
4.7
            May my fight be seen, as not just one to play Scrabble®, but to achieve the 1st objective of the Australian National University Scrabble Society.          
             1.         "To ensure Justice and Equity for all people and groups in society."

PARTICULARS OF CONTINUING DISCRIMINATION, IMPAIRMENT AND LOSS OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE AND LIFE DUE TO INJURIES

            (a)        These would have been supplied prior to the hearing.

PARTICULARS OF OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES AND ECONOMIC LOSS

            (a)        These would have been supplied prior to the hearing.


AND the plaintiff would claim damages, costs and interest pursuant to Order 43A             Rules 1 and 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia High Court Rules in force under the Judiciary Act 1903.

            Signed:                                                                                     ___________________3/1/95
©                                 Alexander Marcel Andrei Sebastian Barker Bailiff
©                                 AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Student #9204215
©         Chairman         AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SCRABBLE SOCIETY                   

                                                                       
            Witnessed: Frank Jones
                                    High Court Registrar                           __________________3/1/95











CLASS CLASSIFICATION

A         Personal Injury                                                                       ∆

B         Debt                                                                                        ∆

C         Other (Directions Required)                                       ˙
FORM 1

Service and Execution of Process Act 1992

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT

THIS NOTICE IS VERY IMPORTANT

PLEASE READ IT AND THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS VERY CAREFULLY

IF YOU HAVE ANY TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THEM
YOU SHOULD GET LEGAL ADVICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

Attached to this notice is a writ of Summons and Statement of Claim ("the attached process") issued out of the High Court of Australia, Canberra Registry.

Service of the attached process outside the Australian Capital Territory is authorised by the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992.

YOUR RIGHTS

If a court of a State or Territory other than the Australian Capital Territory is the appropriate court to determine the claim against you set out in the attached process, you may be able to:

1. have the proceeding stayed by applying to the High Court of Australia, Canberra.

2. apply to the High Court of Australia, Canberra Registry to have the proceeding transferred to another High Court, Registry, or another superior court.

If you think the proceeding should be stayed or transferred you should get legal advice as soon as possible.

CONTESTING THIS CLAIM

If you want to contest this claim, you must take any action set out in the attached process as being necessary to contest the claim.

If you want to contest this claim, you must also file an Appearance in the High Court of Australia, Canberra Registry. You have only 21 days after receiving the attached process to do so.

The Appearance must contain an address in Australia where documents can be left for you.

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzMmByuEyj1Bb1RYLW85YzRyMUk/edit?usp=sharing



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzMmByuEyj1BQnFPN0o4d2IyNWM/edit?usp=sharing


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE CC92/3538/3862/3936/4111 ANNEXURE "A" -
Letters left under door at residence of Michele Piercey from the 20th July onwards.

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


FIRST handwritten with very rounded print

"Dear Michele:
Please contact Cst Harrison atthe police station as soon as possible so that you can discuss today's events with him. He will be available until 11 pm"

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


SECOND handwritten with very round print

"Dear Michelle:
Cst . Harrison would like you to come to the police station tonight at 11:00 to discuss the case and tell how the mediation went."

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


THIRD handwritten with very rounded print

"Dear Michelle
Please meet me at the police station at 11:30 p.m. tonight so we can clear things up a.s.a.p.
Cst Harrison"


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

FOURTH printed with Apple dot matrix printer located ANU Students Association

"You are not going to drag me down this hole and if I have to see you dead to make sure of it then so be it.I know what you really after and I know what your trying to do to me even if nobody else realises it yet.They will soon.Im warning you, slut.If I have to kill you to stop yoiu from trying to damage my reputation and my life than I will and I will enjoy it.
Love from YOU KNOW WHO!!!
XXXOOO"


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

FIFTH printed with Apple dot matrix printer located ANU Students Association

"Getting tiresome isn't it fat stupid slut.It's not about to stop either until you stop your lies and sole your sex problem.Don't think your in control, because your not.I am and i'm winning.Youll be sorry you ever tried to manipulate me. I hope you enjoyed it I hope it was worth the misery you brought upon yourself.

p.s. I saw you in the library today, sitting on the windowsill on the top floor facing outside. I bet you were watching for me but you forgot to look behind you.Don't forget to look over your shoulder!!!" 





DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF:       [CC92/3419/3420/3421]         Date:  22 July 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS      Intentional Threat to Kill, Common Assault 
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My full name is Rachael Michele Piercey.  I was born on 6 March 1973 in Scefferville, Quebec, Canada. I reside at John XXIII College ANU, Canberra. I am currently studying Arts.

About 1 March 1992 I attended an orientation lecture for political science at the ANU. I there met a male person now known to me as Alex BAYLISS. He asked me and my friend Anita to join the Scrabble Club which he was forming. We refused but he was extremely persistant and would not let us pass. I finally grabbed my friends arm and walked off.

I next saw Alex BAYLISS at the following political science Lecture a few days later.  He approached me and sat down next to my friend Anita. He leaned over to his left over my friend Anita and asked if he could have my seat. I said he could not have it. However he persisted and got more agitated and abusive and called me a bitch. He finally told me to go fuck myself. I felt intimidated and scared by Alex Bayliss and did not want him near me. Alex BAYLISS continued to harrass me by sitting next to me every lecture after I had continually told him to leave me alone. His constant unwanted attention to me and verbal abuse led me to file a charge of sexual harrasment against him to the ANU Committee Against Sexual Harrasment in late April 1992.

On Wednesday 22 July 1992 about 11:45am I was walking by myself across Fellows Oval on ANU Campus grounds towards the ANU Chifley Library. As I started to climb the stairs Alex BAYLISS approached me and,
He said: "Leave me alone or you'll be sorry"
I said: "What?"
He said: "Stop harrasing me and stop writing things about me or I'll kill you"
At the time Alex said this to me his face was about 5cm from mine. I felt threatened by him and I believe that he is capable of carrying out his threat to kill me. I believe that Alex BAYLISS will try to harm me as he believes that I have been harrasing him.

Rachel Michelle Piercey

Statement taken and signature witnessed by me at City Police Station on Wednesday 22/7/92 at 17:35 hrs on pages 37.38.39.40 of my official Police Note book.

Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



What has Happened:

I first met Alex Bayliss outside Copland Lecture theatre, after my second or third Political Science I lecture. He knew my friend Anita, who I was with at the time, and asked us both whether we wanted to join the “Scrabble Society”, which he had founded. We refused, but he was very persistent. We eventually had to be quite abrupt and walked away from him. I didn’t think about him again until a subsequent pol. Sci lecture, where Anita and I were sittng in the centre of the front row, waiting for the lecture to begin. Anita was on my right. Alex then came and sat down and informed me that he absolutely had to sit exactly where I was, as he had poor vision, poor hearing, and a poor attention span, and would only be able to understand the lecture if he was to sit exactly where I was. I might have believed this statement, had I not recalled seeing him make exactly this assertion to some other girl during the very first lecture, except twenty rows back. Furthermore, there was a difference of perhaps one metre between my seat and the one Alex was currently occupying, hardly sufficient distance to affect his sight, hearing or attention span, especially given that our lecturer, David Adams, almost never lectures from the podium anyways. Alex was in a better position to understand the lecture where he was.
 Nevertheless, when I refused to move, he insisted that I had to, and asked me why I was being so insensitive. When I refused a second time he became visibly angry, and insisted again. At this point, I looked him in the eye, and told him “I am not moving, you are fine where you are, please leave me alone.” (Anita, who was between us, sat well back in ther chair and attempted to remain uninvolved.) Alex then looked over at me, and said something to the affect of “I bet you’re really proud of yourself, now that was such a good comeback go fuck yourself you stupid bitch.” Anita toldme after the lecture that he’d been shifting his papers, fidgeting, and clearing his throat conspicuously for the entrire hour, presumably to make things diffucult or uncomfortable for Anita and me.

That night I was at Chifley Library on the third floor researching for an essay. It was just prior to closing time, and the lights were being turned off progressively. As I was walking to the corner of the floor to collect my books, Alex emerged from one of the group study rooms and blocked my path. I tried to get past him, (while avoiding talking to him, as Anita and I had discussed,) but he would not let me pass. I said “excuse me”, and he repeated several times “excuse you, excuse you.” He was half-smiling as he said this, and speaking very quietly. There was no one else nearby, and he kept trying to whisper, with his face close to mine. Finallly, after a few seconds of this, I turned to walk between some bookshelves, waited until I was out of view, and hurried to get my things and leave the library.

The next day, I had to go to Chifley Short loan to return a book when the library opened ay 9:00. I did this, and was walking out of Short Loan, as I saw Alex walking in. He changed his course and followed me across the bottom floor, very close behind me, saying very loudly, “nice day, isn’t it?” and axhaling loudly through his nose, making a very odd sound that caused some people in the library to look up from what they were doing and watch as he followed me out the door. He stayed with me all the way past the A.D. hope building towards the Refectory when I stopped at the top of the Union steps to talk to a (male) friend of mine. Alex stopped, turned, and walked the other way.

After that, I saw him nearly every Monday and Wednesday in lectures, where he would sit next to me and try to talk to me casually, fidget conspicuously and distract me while I tried to take notes. I would always ignore him, which made him angrier, I think. I finally approached David Adams with my problem after a particularly bad Wednesday afternnon, in which Alex sat next to me and making coarse comments about how much he hated “fat-titted bitches”. Anita was not present that day. When the lecture handouts were distributed from the left rows, Alex received the pile, and instead of passing them on to me, passed them back, so that I didn’t receive one, and nor did half of the row to my right. He thought this was incredibly funny, and snickered under his breath for the rest of the lecture. When I approached him that day, David Adams said he’d had other complaints and that there was a person he would contact, who I later found out was the disabilities officer. That night, I found an abusive note in my bag that I can’t say came from Alex, as I didn’t see him put it in, but I had reason to believe that he’d done it, as it was not there when I’d got my books out before my lecture. (I have attached a copy of the note to this statement.)

The harassment ceased for a few weeks, presumably after the Disabilities Officer spoke with him, but re-commenced in the Debating Society one afternoon, when I walked in to find Alex participating in an A.N.U.D.S. meeting on the Bridge. Not wanting to re-start anything, I sat inside the Debating Society Office and waited for the meeting to wind up and for him to leave. This was actually the first time I’d encountered him since I had complained to my lecturer, and did not expectanything to happen, but when he got up to leave, he looked directly at me, and actually bent over to look at me through the glass wall off the office, as it was covered with newspaper clippings. This made me extremely uncomfortable.

Later that day, I saw Alex sitting across from me in the Refectory, not doing anything except looking at me. I saw him a few hours later on the steps of Chifley, and again, fifteen minutes later, on the path between college on Dlaey Road and Sullivan’s Creek. All three times he just stared at me, and didn’t look away when I saw him. In fact, it didn’t appear to bother him at all. Of course I realise that there’s not a law against looking at someone or walking freely around the university, but it seemed very coincidental that I hadn’t seen him for several weeks, and then encountered him four times in one day. He’d made me very uncomfortable.

His behaviour has steadily worsened since I encountered him that day. He has followed me around campus at varying distances of 1-100 metres, depending on the location (closer in crowds, further in open spaces.) He has followed me from college on Daley Rd. to an 8 a.m. class in Chifley basement on two separate occasions. I have received another note in my bag which, again, I can’t say was from him, though I have strong suspicions. I found this one after a political science lecture in which he’d been sitting next to me.

His generally obnoxious behaviour in lectures continued until I approached Margaret Evans of the campus Committee Against Sexual Harassment,(C.A.S.H.), who seemed to think that Alex is prone to forgetfulness, and needed to be reminded again. I waited ti hear about what C.A.S.H. intended to do. After my complaint to C.A.S.H., I often encountered him in the Debating Society Office, where he would try to talk to me, which I simply ignored, if no one else was around. If anyone was nearby, he would ignore me, too. He would sometimes try to stop me in the corridor by Student’s Assocaition, and grab my arm if I wouldn’t stop, but I would shake free and keep going.

I received three phone calls of silence, then hanging up, from an unkown person early in the morning over one weekend, which I had reason to suspect was him, as my phone number is easily obtained from Debating Society phone lists. The following Monday, I approached Mary McLeod of Legal Aid at the A.C.T. Magistrate’s Court about obtaining a restraining order against Alex. She said that my case of harassment was borderline, and that if it went to a hearing, as she expected it might, my chances were “iffy” at best. She suggested I see what transpired at C.A.S.H. before pursuing anything else legally. That afternoon, when no one else was around, Alex accosted me on the Bridge and asked how I was doing in overcoming my “sex problem.” I tried to leave via the door closest the Asian Bistro, but he blocked my path, and put his hands on my shoulders, which freaked me out sufficiently to inspire me to shove him out of the way to get past him. From then on, I engaged in a lot of avoidance behaviours so that I wouldn’t have to deal with Alex at all. I changed my regular routes around campus, avoided the library, and would not go to pol. sci. lectures if I saw that he wold be attending. He continue t make his presence well and truly known at the Deb. Soc, office, showing up for no apparent reason but to engage people in discussion, usually about himself, even if, or especially if, I was there.

C.A.S.H subsequently arranged for one of it’s members, Harry Geddes, to talk to Alex about how he’d been acting. That evening, presumably after being spoken to, Alex stormed into the Student’s Association, where I was talking with Stella Gaha and Simon Brettel, A.N.U.D.S. president. I left the room immediately when Alex tried to engage Stella in a discussion about “my problems”, but did hear vague threats of retribution and defamation actions. (Stella would be far more able to elaborate on the contents of this discussion than I.)

The following Friday, I received a phone call from someone claiming to be a secretary at Snedden, Hall, and Gallup, who have represented Alex in his many actions against people and corporations in the past. The caller inquired as to whether I’d be at college between two and five p.m. on the following Saturday, as they intended to serve me with a Writ of defamation. I was home for part of that time the next day, but no writ ever materialized. On the following Monday, my friend Matthew Sag contacted Snedden’s to enquire about the mysterious event. Their office knew nothing about the writ, and further stated they would never phone before having one served. That week, Matthew had a further conversation with Alex, in which Alex actually admitted casually to having been abusive and harassing towards me, and writing me notes, and that he knew he was a “vexatious litigant”, whatever that means.

Until recently, I have not encountered Alex at all because I have completely restructured my life to avoid him. However, I am afraid he may be attempting to make his presence known by other means. Recently, John XXIII college has been plagued by a series of false fire alarms, seven in as many days. On 20 June, I stayed up to wait in my corridor for whoever was responsible. As I was only a few doors down from my room, I left my door open, and did not shut it when I went to the bathroom, and to the vending machine to get a snack. When I returned, I found my door had been shut, but didn’t think much of it, as there were lots of people returning from the bars at that time, and assumed someone had shut it for me as they walked past. However, when I opened my door a few minutes later, I found the room filled with smoke. Someone had plugged in my iron and placed it on my pillow, which by then had a sizeable burn in it. I unplugged the iron. About 40 minutes later, the college experienced its seventh fire alarm. The police were called, and asked whether I thought anyone “had it in for me.” Alex was the only person I could think of, though realistically, I’m unsure about how far he really would go and whether this was a genuine possibility for him. There is also some question as to whether he might somehow be connected to a plague of obscene phone calls at the college. He certainly has access to my phone number, and I believe that I was the first person at the college to receive such a phone call. I have recorded the date of the phone call with Naomi Knight of C.A.S.H.. The phone call went as follows:
Me: Hello. (silence) Hello
Caller: Play with your pussy for me honey.
Me: Play with this. (whack the phone loudly on the desk before hanging up.)

I don’t know if this was Alex or not, though the caller did have an effeminate voice, as Alex does. I don’t know why or if he would go on to call others or not, but the police and my college seem to think there is some connection.

What I Want to Happen:

I would like to obtain a restraining order to keep Alex away from me the next time he “forgets”. I do not want to spend the rest of my life changing my life around so as to avoid him, and what’s more, I shouldn’t have to. I have the right to travel freely on campus which is in fact, my home, and should be able to take part in academic and social activities without constantly looking over my shoulder. These are not unreasonable expectations, and I feel the university should be doing more to uphold them for me. C.A.S.H. has certainly made a real effort to help, but a slap on the wrist and a “good talking to” by a law professor are not adequate deterrents for someone who obviously need expert help for his own sake and disciplinary action, for the sake of all women on campus who have been victimized by inaction.

Contacts: This is a list of some of the people I have contacted for help or advice with this problem.
Fr. Ian Waite Master, John XXIII College                                         248-5526
Dennis Krozen Australian Federal Police                                           249-7444
Margaret Evans C.A.S.H.                                                                   249-2442
Mary McLeod Legal Aid                                                                    267-2825
Camilla Newcombe A.N.U.D.S.                                                         249-4722
Stella Gaha A.N.U.D.S                                                                                   286-5325
Matthew Sag A.N.U.D.S.                                                                   281-0984
David Adams A.N.U. Political Science Dept.                                    249-2659
*Messages only



DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF:       [CC92/3419/3420/3421]         Date:  28 July 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS Threat to Kill, Common Assault, Possess Ammunition
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My name is Rachel Michele Piercey. Further to my statement that I provided to Constable HAINS on 28 July 1992, I met with Constable HAINS on 28 July 1992 and provided him with a copy of the paper I submitted to the ANU Committee Against Sexual Harrassment in May. This paper consists of 5 pages and is the original document. I have signed and dated each page of this document.

Rachel Michele Piercey

28 July 1992

Statement taken and signature witnessed by me on page 3 of my official notebook at 935 on Tuesday 28 July 1992 at Childrens Court, Childers Street, Civic, ACT.

Constable Harry Thomas Hains 4928


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,



AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF:[CC1992/3538][SCA92/143] Date:  13 August 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS Breach Interim Protection Order [IRO 1992/279]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation University Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
My full name is Rachel Michele Piercey. I currently reside at Room 1068 John XXIII College, Daley Road, Acton. I am a student at the Australian National University currently studying Arts.

On Wednesday the 30th July 1992 I was asleep in my room at John XXIII College. I was awoken by three loud knocks at my door. I got up and went to the door and opened it. I did not ask who it was as I thought it was a friend from the College. When I opened the door I saw a male person known to me as Alex BAYLISS. He was wearing dark clothes and had his right hand across the door as I opened it. I recall him saying something but I was unsure as to what as I was tired and had a fever. I took a step back, and stumbled over something and fell back to the floor, bumping my eye on a cupboard as I fell. My eye hurt. I then either kicked the door or slammed the door closed. After the door was shut I sat on the floor until 8:00am as I was too scared to leave my room.

I am currently the applicant of an Interim Protection Order against Alex BAYLISS. At no time did I give him permission to approach my room.

Statement taken an signature witnessed by me at City Station on 7/8/92.

                 Constable Rebecca Lousie McNevin 5038                                         Michele PIERCEY 7/8/92


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF: [CC92/4111] [SCA92/155]  Date:  8 August 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS Breach Interim Restraining Order [IRO 1992/279]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation University Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My full name is Rachel Michele Piercey. I was born on 6 March 1973. I reside at John XXIII College ANU. I am currently a Studnet studying Arts at the Australian National University.

At 2.30am on Tuesday the Eight September 1992, I was asleep in my room at John XXIII College when my personal phone rang. I believe it rang twice before I got to it sa it is situated across the room from my bed. I picked it up and had a short conversation with a male person whose voice I instantly recognised as Alexander BAYLISS.
I said: "Hello"
Alex said: "We can finally be together in a little while sweetheart-unintelligible"

At the time he said this he was brathing heavily into the phone and his voice was very calm and quiet. I was extremely scared and I wanted to tell him I knew who he was and that I wanted the phone calls to stop and to leave me alone.
I said: "Alex..."
Before I could complete what I wanted to say, he cut me off.
He said: "Shut up, bitch, right now, shut up, shut up, you're dead, I'm coming to get you right now."

At the time he said this voice became extremely harsher, louder and more threatening. Whilst I was talking on the phone I noted down the converation word for word on a Russian vocabularly study sheet and retained this in my possession. I then called Yvonne PERRY, the Pastoral Sub-Dean of John XXIII college to inform her of what happened and that I was scared that Alex was coming over to harm me. I then had a further conversation with her and a short time later I attended at her room where I called Police. I also arranged for all incoming phone calls to my personal number to be diverted to Yvonne PERRY'S phone as I was fearful that Alex would call me and threaten me again.

A short time later I met with Constable HAINS and Constable PERRIMAN at John XXIII college. I had a short conversation with Constable HAINS and provided him with a statement of what had happened. After Police left I locked my door and tried to go to sleep but could not as I was fearful that Mr BAYLISS would attempt to harrass or harm me. I handed Constable HAINS my notes.

I have been experiencing difficulty in sleeping and attempting to participate in normal activities such as going out and walking around the campus due to the constant threats and harrassment by Mr BAYLISS over the last six months. Some of these incidents are the subject of current court proceedings against Alexander BAYLISS>

I am the applicant and Mr BAYLISS is the respondent in Interim Restraining Order number 279/92 which is current till the seventeenth of September 1992. This order prohibits Alex BAYLISS from contacting me, approaching or threatening me and has constantly breached it since the order was made on 23 July 1992 before Magistrate Dingwall.

I can think of no reason why Alexander BAYLISS would not want to threaten me or harrass me. I have never been involved in any type of relationship with him. I have never phoned him or attempted to contact him or instigated my meetings with him other than attempting to solve this problem outside the court system via mediation with Alex. This was organised by the ANU'S Committee Against Sexual Harrassment member Margaret EVANS and Harry GEDDES. Both these persons were present on 20th August 1992 at ANU Counselling Centre when Alexander BAYLISS and I met to try to alleviate the problem. I would consider that mediation was a waste of time as Alex BAYLISS treated me with scorn and dersision during the Session which lasted two hours.

I am fearful of Alexander BAYLISS as I genuinely believe that he will attempt to carry out his threat to kill me. Since his harrasment of me started in March 1992 the nature of his threats against me have become increasingly violent with threats to kill me and threats to "Be with me" which I take to be sexual threats.


Rachel Michele PIERCEY 8 August 1992


Statement taken and signature witnessed by me at 9.35pm on 8 August 1992 at City Police Station.


Constable Harry Thomas HAINS 4928


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF: [CC92/3936] [SCA92/154]  Date:  22 August 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS Breach Interim Restraining Order [IRO 1992/279]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation University Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My full name is Rachel Michele PIERCEY. I was born on 6 March 1973. I reside at Room 1068 John XXIII College ANU. I am a student currently Studying Arts.

About 1.10am on Saturday 22 August 1992 I was asleep in my room at John XXIII College when I was awoken by the sound of my phone ringing. I answered it and:
I said: "Hello"
A male voice replied:
He said: "You're soon dead sweet heart-untelligible"
I instantly recognized this voice as Alexander BAYLISS a person whom I have a current  Interim Protection Order Number 279/92 against.
It is in force until 17 September 1992.
I said: "Who is this"
The reason why I said this is because I have received simiar phone calls from Alexander BAYLISS and he has never Identified himself before to me and I wanted to try to get him to say who he was.
He said: "Get ready I'm coming for you sweet heart-laughter"
I then slammed the phone down quickly. At this time I was extremely scared that Alexander BAYLISS was coming to do something to me. I was crying and upset and did not want to stay in the room by myself. Soon after the phone rang again and i unplugged it. I then located a computer type written note which must have slipped under my door while I was asleep. This note was extremely threatening and stated the author was goin to kill me. I believe that the author of this note is Alexander BAYLISS the person whom I had just recieved a phone call. This note increased the fear that I already felt for my own life. I then quickly jotted down the telephone conversation I had just had with Alex BAYLISS, took possession of the Type written note and attended at City Police Station about 1.45am on Saturday 22 August 1992.

Shortly after arriving at the Police Station, I had a conversation with Constable HAINS and Constable HEROLD. I handed Constable HAINS the copy of the telephone conversation I had written down and the type written note I had found under my door. I then gave a statement regarding the telephone conversation to Constable HAINS and signed it. I then remained at City Police Station until I was made aware by Constable HAINS that Alex BAYLISS had been arrested as I was fearful of going back to m y room on my own and had no where elase to go.

Rachel Michele Piercey 22 August 1992

Statement taken and signature witnessed by me at City Police Station on Saturday 22 August 1992 at 0150 hours,

Constable Harry Thomas HAINS 4928


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,


AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF:[CC92/3862][SCA92/153] Date:  1 September 1992
POLICE v Alexander BAYLISS Breach Interim Protection Order        [IRO 1992/279]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NAME: Rachel Michele Piercey AKA: ANU Debating Society peer group pressure patsie
ADDRESS John XXIII College ANU, Acton Rm 1068 Occupation University Student
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My full name is Rachel Michele Piercey. I currently reside at the above address. My date of birth is the 6th March 1973. I am currently studying at the Australian National University.

About 8:25pm on Monday the 17th August 1992 I was walking towards the Chifley Library within the grounds of the ANU. As I neared the entrance to the library I saw a male person known to me as Alex BAYLISS on the steps of the library. Alex BAYLISS is currently the respondent in an Interim Restraining Order held by me. I saw that Alex was wearing cream or yellow coloured trousers, a brown suit jacket and a white bicyle helmet with a white visor. I noticed that his trousers were tucked into his socks. He was riding a mens ten speed bicycle but I cannot say what colour it was as it was dark. There was a water bottle attached to the main frame of the bicycle. I immediately turned and walked in the opposite direction towards the Sports Union building. I waited inside the building for about ten minutes.

A short time later I returned to the library. I then saw that Alex was outside the Sports Union building on the bicycle (I think it was brown). I turned again and walked towards the Student Union building. I turned and saw that he was following me. I walked faster. He came up behind me and passed about one foot away on my left side. He continued ahead about ten feet and turned and headed again. He then approached me again within an arms length. He passed, turned and was approaching me from behind again. I turned again and walked towards the library. I was extremely scared as there was no one around and I didn't know what he was going to do. I started up the steps so that he couldn't follow me. I then saw that he had ridden up a ramp and was riding straight at me. I turned again and saw an ANU Security car nearby. I walked towards it. Alex then circled me once more and then rode off as I neared the car.

I then spoke with the Security Guard and told him what had happened. A short time later I attended City Police Station and spoke with Constable McNevin. I told her certain things and she took a stateent from me which I signed. I also handed her four pieces of paper with writing on them. She took photocopies of them and handed the originals back to me. I then returned to my room where I stayed until Constable McNEVIN informed ma that Alex BAYLISS had been arrested.

At no time did I give Alex BAYLISS permission to approach me.

Statement taken and signature witnessed by me at City Police Station on Tuesday the 1/9/92 at 6:00pm.

Rachel Michele PIERCEY


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

1. 93/1477 Detective Constable Danny Kinderan 3735 Detective Constable Michael Pearce 4766 provided me these defamatory documents.


                                                "CORRUPTION.         
The Australian Federal Police, the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, the Canberra Times, all involved in the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice with the ANU Debating Society and it's puppet, Rachel M. Piercey , a known liar out to grab power for herself in the ANU Debating Society. I have been wrongfully arrested, prosecuted and convicted by a judicial system - judical system entwined in a web of sexual politics and deceit. The complainant, Miss Piercey, has been sexually involved with both the arresting police offficer in this matter and the prosecutor, Ken Archer. Additionally the Canberra Times accounted the court case was exaggerated and distorted by the naive young court reporter, Michael BACHELARD, who was seduced over lunch at the Calypso Cafe with Miss Piercey, who aimed to make her dubious if temporary victory, though it may seem more than it was, in a very public way. This utterly unjust treatment of me, an ambitious and innocent young man, is completely unfounded and will be overturned in the Supreme Court."

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

2. 93/1477 Detective Constable Danny Kinderan 3735 Dective Constable Michael Pearce 4766 provided me these defamatory documents.



"Rachel Michelle Piercey is a compulsive liar and a scapegoat of the ANU Debating Society. The society organised a campaign of pure propaganda against me, Alexander Bayliss, an innocent person and one of many of the societies victim's. A Constable of the Australian Federal Police, Harry Thomas HAINES, has been aiding in the conspiracy against me. He is sexually involved with the complainant. I have independant witness'es to verify that I was not near Rachel Michelle PIERCEY when the alleged offences were committed, but the Chief Magistrate, his honour Ron CAHILL, a portly distinguished gentleman, disregarded this because he is currently mounting a campaign to be appointed to the High Court and wishes to ingratiate himself to the Society patron, the Chief Justice Sir Anthony MASON. This is a gross miscarriage of justice and it is critically vital that my appeal be heard in the Supreme Court and this conviction be overturned. You can help me in my quest:
1. Boycott the activities of the ANU Debating Society. Do not attend its functions or become a member of this cruel elitist organisation.
2. Write a letter of protest to the Attorney-General of the ACT insisting the convictions be overturned and Miss Piercey be escorted to the Canberra City limits never allowed to return.
3. Write Miss Piercey, care of John 23rd College, ANU and implore her to do the right by victims of the ANU Debating Society and recant the stories she told the Federal Police and her lover, Harry Haines."

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

3. 93/1477 Detective Constable Danny Kinderan 3735 Dective Constable Michael Pearce 4766 provided me these defamatory documents.



"The ANU Debating Society is engaging in a smear campaign against me, an ordinary Uni student, Alexander Bayliss, in retaliation for a threat I made to sue the society for puerile propaganda written about me in the society newsletter. The society is conspiring with all levels of police and the judiciary to falsely accuse me of harassing .c.Rachel Michelle Piercey;, known to be a openly promiscious and a compulsive liar. Here are the facts.
*Completely unfounded charges have been brought against me by Rachel Piercey, a scapegoat of the ANU Debating Society. The police constable that arrested me, Harold Thomas Hains, is sexually involved with the complainant.
*The Director of Public Prosecutions went ahead with the case against me, with no independant corroboration of Ms Piercey's story, because Ms Piercey had also been involved with the prosecutor, Ken Archer.
*Reports in the Canberra Times were grossly distorted and biased, because the complainant made sexual advances towards the court reporter, Michael Bachelard, after the first trial.
*Finally, the Chief Magistrate, Mr Ron CAHILL, convicted me on Ms Pierceys evidence alone, even though it was frought with inconsistencies and lies, because he wishes to ingratiate himself  to the society patron, the Chief Justice Sir Anthony Mason.
This is a gross miscarriage of justice. You can support me in my fight against this society of injustice. Do not attend functions hosted by this cowardly, deceitful organisation. Write a letter to Ms Piercey (c/John XXIII, ANU) or phone her on 279 4940, imploring her to recant her lies, and back me up when I challenge the Conspiracy in the ACT Supreme Court. Help me thwart this organisation of liars and perjurers."

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

4. 93/1477 Detective Constable Danny Kinderan 3735 Dective Constable Michael Pearce 4766 provided me these defamatory documents.



"There are many forces at work in the ACT judical system, but who really makes the decisions ? It seems the most important factor in judical decision making is sex. The Chief Magistrate, Ron Cahill, was plied with sexual favours by a dishonest complainant, Rachel PIERCEY, to convict me in his capacity as a coronoer, to implicate me in the murder - in the murder in 1989 of the Assistant Police Commissioner. When will this persecution of me end ? When will the lies of Miss Pearcey be exposed for what they are and her sexual manipulation of the ACT Magistrates Court be publicly condemned ? Support me in my quest to have the Supreme Court overturn this tyranny of injustice. Contact Miss Piercey, care of John the 23rd College, phone 279 4940 and Mr Cahill, care of the ACT Magistrates Court, and implore then to come forward and finally tell the truth."

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

5. 93/1477 Detective Constable Danny Kinderan 3735 Dective Constable Michael Pearce 4766 provided me these defamatory documents.


"Why does the Criminal Justice System continue to ignore the tyranny that is the ANU Debating Society.
In order to protect my own safety, and to prevent further assault by the legal authorities, I can no longer tell you my name. I have found myself to be persecuted by the ANUDS and it's allies when they prevented me from exercising my constitutional right to speak to the premier of Victoria.. The ANUDS elisted, the aid, of the, Victorian Dogs squad, licencing police and paramilitary death squads to have me forcibly evicted from the premises of the Victorian Parliament.

The A.N.U. Debating Society looks to most participants at "Worlds". To be an ordinary Debating Society. I and the International Scrabble Confederation know that it is not. Here are the facts and the decide for yourself.

The facts are that the present President of the ANU Debating Society (NB. He is in ANU B) is not a regular guy. Look at him closely He is a dangerous dissociated personality that seeks. to destroy everything he touches. He is a member of the University Army Cadets, who were recruited for special Forces during the Vietnam War. We know that those Forces were given Agent Orange and other drugs designed to. Create superhuman facilities. in the insane desire to end the war. Files released by me under the Freedom of Information Act (s.234) show that ANU President (Timothy Charles Hughes) was involved in these experiments, which have given him paranormal abilities. In his regiment, he was known as "The Fly", because he can transmute himself at will. The Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia would not want to be a Patron of the ANUDS if he knew this. That is why some people will go to any lengths to stop this information  now. Listen and decide for yourself.

Another former President of the Australian National University Debating  Society  is Richard. William Douglas. (Also in ANU B) He has been the secret Mastermind behind the great Whitewash. The desire to imprison, aid , abet, and destroy has always been with him. He is a paranoiac delusionary with aspirations to national and Global leadership. He has been building relationships in the Debating World, with Foreign Governments and with the International Intelligence communities. He is know to have long associations with monied Arab Oil interests. Nostradamus fortold (Quatrain 426) that "one. would come to bend the law to his palm in the Greta South Land He will be from the Caledonians, and will issue from a lake where no lake was before. Where all the world is come to the celestial city where all seasons stop, there will the Lawbreaker seek the crown, and crush the Eagle"

Nostradamus warns us of the danger to all the world of "the one who will come from the Calendonians" (Scottish Name + Douglas)  form a "city where there was no lake before" (Ie. Canberra). You can refuse to believe me, but when the catastophy occurs, it will be too late. Act now.

Whilst  I cannot tell you my name for legal reasons (Defamation Act (Vic)) I make you a promise. Before this tournament is over . Someone will have to defend the Eagle. This means that someone will have to stop the law breakers. The President of now of the past the past will be stopped. A single bullet can stop the curse. Take your chance now. Someone will. Someone will aid, abet, attack, destroy, shoot, mutilate, lay waste to and, triangulate.

We have to fight back. Bullet or Icepick now, or an enslaved future. No-one believed "Sarah Connors", did they."


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

XIV WORLD UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE JANUARY 1994

XIV WORLD UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE JANUARY 1994

The XIV WORLD UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP, Chief Adjudicator, MICHAEL GRONOW [Owen Dixon 205 William Street 03 9608 7115 DX 96 Melbourne 03 9601 6447] was provoked to say:- "The AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY have caused a security scare by saying someone threatened to kill them. As we have since found out it was only a practical joke and they delayed the WORLD UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS for half an hour, if they do it again we will personally threaten to kill them."

This was witnessed by:- WUDC Chairman WILLIAM IRVING 242 Exhibition Street Melbourne 03 9634 2160 03 9600 1271; WUDC Publication Director DELIA BURRAGE 21/385 Bourke Street 03 9670 6123 DX 428 Melbourne 03 9670 4475; Chairman Worlds Council TIMOTHY McEVOY 101 Collins Street 03 9288 1234 DX 240 Melbourne 03 9288 1567; WUDC Social Director JULIA PRYOR 28/525 Collins Street 03 9643 4000 DX 101 Melbourne 03 9643 5999; RICHARD DOUGLAS 17/221 St George Tce 08 9366 8000 DX 169 Perth 08 9366 6111; TONYA RISZKO 13 Farrer Braddon 02 6248 6426/7494;

KATH CUMMINS, [22 Cobokn Avenue Lane Cove 02 9427 5915 02 9265 3000 AFR 02 6240 4040] so far, wrote all ANUDS  fabricated defamatory documents, providing one at XIV WORLD UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE, JANUARY 1994, before making another "false accusation" of "threat to kill" as she could not "incite and encourage" and "aid and abet" RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY [11/71 Tinderry Circuit Palmerston] to do so as in 1992, 1993 as RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY was not in Melbourne. ANU "B", KATH CUMMINS, with JANINA JANKOWSKI, [11 Tattersall Crescent Florey 02 6259 2547] "incited and encouraged" and "aided and abeted" RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY to make another "false accusation" of "threat to kill", in 1995, and then KATE KELLY [9 & 14 Beltana Road Piallago 02 6247 5860] to make a "false accusation" of "threat to kill", in 1996, to AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE Dt Sgt acting Supt Tim Fisher (Solomon Island).

This is witnessed by:- MARK NOLAN 8 George Gilfillan Avenue Kempsey 02 6562 5388; TIM HUGHES 3/125 Old South Head Road Bondi Junction 02 9389 2084 / 02 9361 6637; MATTHEW SAG 55 Clarina Street Chapel Hill 07 9378 0098; Parents JUDY and ROSS son WILL DE VERE 8 Castle Place Melba 02 6258 2486

SIMON GERARD BRETTELL [10/8 Britten-Jones Drive Holt ACT 2615 612 6254 3646] ANUTECH North Road cnr Barry Drive Acton 612 6249 5660 612 6249 5648 provided EVIDENCE confirming this in a letter, before 72 fraud convictions;

"Monday, 24 January, 1994

Mr William Irving,

Chairman — Championship Committee 14th World Universities Debating Championship...

I would also like to properly apologise for the incident that occurred to interfere with one of the debating rounds, involving our A.N.U. “B” team.

This was not called for and I hope that the ramifications for you have not been serious....

Best wishes for 1994.  I look forward to seeing you soon.

Yours sincerely,

SIMON BRETTELL 

Immediate Past President A.N.U. Debating Society"

Annette Margaret & Orme Frederick & Jeremy Orme & Ashley Jonathon BRETTELL 4 Trumper Street Holt ACT 2615;

© Amicus Curae Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Bailiff Ph.D Laws (HC)(ANU)  The ANU Scrabble® Society

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

Tell 1 212 963 3018 Facts 1 212 963 3922 Mob 1 917 913 0239 LPO Box 70 Australia National University Canberra ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY

RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

JANINA JANKOWSKI                    KATH CUMMINS                    KATE KELLY


RACHEL MICHELLE PIERCEY     secret lover          SIMON GERARD BRETTELL

DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,









































Sunday, 29 September 2013


Asburton Guardian South Island New Zealand Oceania
Welcome International Council of 13grandmothers@gmail.com


SAINT ANDREWS FEAST DAY


SATURDAY 30 NOVEMBER 2013


R v BAILIFF 2011
UNITED NATIONS
WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION
NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF MENTAL IMPAIRMENT

UNITED NATIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION

NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF MENTAL IMPAIRMENT BY ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRE SEBASTIAN BARKER BAILIFF [2011] IN AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SUPREME COURT 214 ON 30 NOVEMBER 2011 WITH ONE SENTENCE AND ONE P.127 A4 PAGE FROM BRAIN DAMAGE MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECTS BY PHILIP W. BATES BLACKWELL PRESS 1994 ISBN: 187511436X TAKEN FROM ALWYN LISHMAN'S ORGANIC PSYCHIATRY: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CEREBRAL DISORDER ISBN 0632095407 


"Parker QC, Roger, Barrister-at-Law, (61 2 9221 3890), p.127, Chapter 7, Adducing Evidence to Prove or Disprove Brain Damage, Brian Damage Medico-Legal Aspects, Blackwell Press, Sydney, (1994). 
(My Phaedra complex Philip W. Bates is General Editor, Adjunct Professor, University of Sydney & Sir Owen Dixon Chambers)

"6. The Clinical Picture in Focal Cerebral Disorder Lishman says at p.16 that strictly focal brain damage can be responsible for both acute and chronic organic reactions. He says that a frontal lesion may confer distinctive changes of disposition and temperement. Most characteristic is a disinhibition with expanisive overfamiliarity, tactlessness, overtalk[at]iveness, childish excitement or prankish and punning social and ethical control may be diminished with lack of concern  for the future and for the consequence of actions. Sexual indiscretions and petty misdemeanours may occur, or gross errors of judgement with regard to financial or interpersonal matters. Sometimes there is a marked indifference, even callousness for the feelings of others. Equally lack of anxiety and insight on the part of the patient into his or her condition. Elevation of mood is often seen, namely and empty and fatous euphoria rather than a true elation which communicates to the observer. In other cases the principal changes are lack of initiative, aspontaneity and a profound slowing of psychomotor activity. Concentration, attention and ability to carry out a planned activity are impaired by thee changes but performances on test of formal intelligence is often surprisingly well preserved once the patients has been secured.


Reference:- Lishman, William Alwyn, Organic Psychiatry, the Psychological Conssequences of Cerebral Disorder, Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford (1987). 


World Health Organisation International Classification of Impairment Disability and Handicap (1981)


(Commissioner of World Health Organisation Aids Conference in 1988 was Michael Kirby and the second representative for Australia was Philip W. Bates) (World Health Organisation Health Legislation Collaboration Centre Head for 10 years my Philip W. Bates specialising in Tuberculosis)(My Great grandfather Dr James Watt was Medical Superintendant in London also specialising in Tuberculosis)(His daughter is Margaret Watt my Nana named just like daughter of James Watt born in January 19 1736, son of James Watt whose grandson was also called James Watt Jnr) (Watt has been described as one of the most influential figures in human history.[2] He developed the concept of horsepower[3] and the SI unit of power, the watt named after him.)

  1. ^ Hart, Michael H. (2000). The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. New York: Citadel. ISBN 0-89104-175-3.
  2. Jump up^ Lira, Carl (2001). "Biography of James Watt". egr.msu.edu. Retrieved 5 July 2010.

(The Barker is a Crier of the Court from Onibury in Shropshire and the list of people in the Court is the Barker's List) (Uncle Wilfrid Barker won the bid to hold 2000 Sydney Olympics) (The Bailiff is a Minor Court Official with Police Authority who were established hundreds of years later and sailed from Normandy in France with William the Conqueror in 1066 with a Papal Bull to become King of England just like I will soon.)

My apprenticeship against the Chief Justice of High Court of Australia prompted Adelaide, Brisbane, Canberra, Darwin, Hobart, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney Police Commissioners to contract Canberra, contact with 659 Shires, 800 Police Stations, 1000 State Emergency Services, 1788 Territory, State and Commonwealth only elected representatives and senior officers of higher education plus 2780 electronic white pages listings of police and 1680 electronic white page listings of Air Force, Army, Navy and Defence in Australia. Resulting in legislation in Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, South Australia, Queensland, Western Australia, Victoria, New South Wales and Commonwealth to found inadequate Australian Crime Commission with absolutely no powers to employ 70,000 Air Force, Army, Navy to incarcerate all citizens, barristers, solicitors, judiciary, military, police, politicians, priests and senior officers of higher education for contempt.

In R v BAILIFF 2011 CHIEF TERRENCE HIGGINS SAID, "HE IS FAMILIAR WITH INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF IMPAIRMENT DISABILITY HANDICAP (1981) NOT GUILTY."

SO R v BAILIFF 2011 PROVIDES 10% of SOCIETY IMPAIRED

A UNITED NATIONS LAWFUL RIGHT TO MURDER WHO EVER THEY WANT ANY WHERE IN THE WORLD AS THEY ARE NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF MENTAL IMPAIRMENT.
R v BAILIFF 2011 ALSO EDUCATES THE WORLD THAT THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION ACT (UNITED KINGDOM) HAS BEEN REPEALED AS IT IS INVALID SINCE WORLD WAR I, TREATY OF VERSAILLES, LEAGUE OF NATIONS, WORLD WAR II, ATLANTIC CHARTER & UNITED NATIONS.


THE MASON PAPERS SELECTED ARTICLES and SPEECHES

This book comprises a selection of articles and speeches by Sir Anthony Mason written and delivered when he was a Justice and later Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia and after his retirement from that Court in 1995. It demonstrates his long standing interest in the judicial process and his desire to communicate to the legal world and the public a more enlightened understanding of the proper scope of judicial law-making and the responsibility of judges for adapting the law to the changing conditions in society. It also displays his acknowledged mastery of public and private law and his belief in the growing significance of international and comparative law in the development of Australian law. The book contains some important speeches and articles on constitutional and administrative law, international law, human rights, equity and contract, the High Court, judicial administration, advocacy, a significant media interview, a State of the Judicature report delivered as the Chief Justice of Australia and his swearing in speeches when appointed as a Justice and later Chief Justice of the High Court. Some of the selected speeches display Sir Anthony's characteristic wit. The book deals with highly topical subjects such as whether Australia should adopt a bill of rights, the health of Australia's democratic institutions, the establishment of an Australian republic, globalization and the decline of parliamentary and national sovereignty. The articles and speeches were chosen and edited by Professor Geoffrey Lindell in consultation with Sir Anthony. 442 pages.




Aboriginal Symbols
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bwa5a9nLB1D2R3ZmVHRiQ2lKQ28/edit?usp=sharing

Australian Shires
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bwa5a9nLB1D2R3ZmVHRiQ2lKQ28/edit?usp=sharing


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qsJGqRmMJbQmFjeGZxejBaYWs/edit?usp=sharing

Report of Dr Stephen Allnutt dated 10 April 2012.pdf

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qsJGqRmMJbSE1NM1Jpb09TM00/edit?usp=sharing


Professor Hayes Report.pdf

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qsJGqRmMJbZnRlNkxuV0hfVFU/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qsJGqRmMJbdlFPYXc5UEpTQTA/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bwa5a9nLB1D2dGZIWXg2ZVFrMlk/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qsJGqRmMJbNkVNWTF0RmpBbEk/edit?usp=sharing



EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT









No. SCC 139 of 2009

Judge: Higgins CJ
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 30 November 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No. SCC 139 of 2009
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )


R

v

ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRE SEBASTIAN BARKER BAILIFF








ORDER

Judge: Higgins CJ
Date: 30 November 2011
Place: Canberra

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The defendant is not guilty by reason of mental impairment.

MR GILL: The accused pleads not guilty to the charge. Incorporated in that plea is a plea of not guilty by reason of mental impairment, specifically due to symptoms of brain damage.
HIS HONOUR: Yes. All right.
MR GILL: With my friend’s consent at the commencement of the trial proceedings, I tender a report by Graham George.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR GILL: Your Honour already has the report in that bundle of documents that was tendered for the fitness to plea proceedings.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR GILL: It is a report dated 29 April 2011.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I have that.
MR GILL: I tender one of the attachments referred to in it which includes the article by Mr Leeshman.
MR LAWTON: Or a reference to it.
MR GILL: Reference to an article by Mr Leeshman.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I have that. Thank you.
MR GILL: Specifically your Honour will see that Dr George says: “Mr Bailiff has an established diagnosis of an organic mental disorder, inclusive of a persistently hypermanic to manic mood disorder in association with personality change and cognitive difficulties.” I note that the report was prepared in relation to fitness to plead, but we say that that raises the issue of mental impairment.
HIS HONOUR: Well it is the objective circumstance and the purpose for which it is prepared that is important.
MR GILL: On receipt of that report and before the commencement of the rest of the trial, I ask your Honour to permanently stay the proceeding.
HIS HONOUR: On what basis?
MR GILL: On the basis that there has been excessive delay in the proceedings.
HIS HONOUR: Unreasonable delay I think is the term.
MR GILL: The application is made in reliance on the authority of R v Kara Lesley Mills [2011] ACTSC 109 (‘Mills’) and the right that is conferred under the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) (‘Human Rights Act’) as recognised by your Honour in Mills.
HIS HONOUR: It certainly is that.
MR GILL: We acknowledge that this case does not involve the delay that was seen in the case of Kara Mills. The delay in her case was a much more grievous delay.
HIS HONOUR: Egregious, yes. There is also the question of the effect upon the fairness of the proceeding.
MR GILL: In Ms Mills’ case, helpfully, your Honour noted there was an extension to the common law jurisdiction which enabled the grant of a stay, in that there was not a necessity to find those other common law factors which had previously been required because of the right to be heard under the Human Rights Act.
The particular issue that we say arises here in contrast to Mills, is that Mills involved a relatively serious offence in relation to drug trafficking. So the offence that is brought before your Honour today does not fall into that sort of category. Even if it is not categorised as a trivial offence, we would say that in the overall scheme of matters it is a minor offence in the sense that the offence provision itself is not at the most serious order of magnitude and the particular ---
HIS HONOUR: I do recall that I dismissed a charge in relation to another person, Mr Robertson I think his name was, who was suffering from considerable mental problems. I dismissed it on the ground of relative triviality, under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) of course.
MR GILL: Well this is likewise a damage to property type offence.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, it is.
MR GILL: But when one looks at the scope of what the encompassed damage property - - -
HIS HONOUR: Well I think I need to have more on that.
MR BAILIFF: Excuse me, your Honour. Could we seek to tender the Magna Carta for the period of time before trial happens?
HIS HONOUR: No, we do not need the Magna Carta, it has been repealed.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour - - -
HIS HONOUR: It has been repealed. Take a seat.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour, the Constitution is British as well.
HIS HONOUR: It is still repealed.
MR BAILIFF: We have not repealed it yet, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, we have. Go on.
MR GILL: So your Honour should have a case statement available to you.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I have.
MR GILL: I have no objection to your Honour seeing that case statement.
HIS HONOUR: Yes. Well I presume that will be the case relied upon anyway, Mr Gill.
MR GILL: It is. There is a necessity to call Mr Franks.
HIS HONOUR: Could you give me another copy? There are so many papers in the file now. I think that the Crown would concede that those facts would be established except for - - -
MR LAWTON: Yes, there is some minor disagreement about the mechanism.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I understand.
MR LAWTON: There is a potentially major disagreement surrounding the circumstances which lead to Mr Bailiff to act in such a manner.
HIS HONOUR: No, I understand his perception is that the structure he built was being attacked and he thought he was entitled to defend himself in respect of that, or defend the structure if you like. At law that would not run.
MR GILL: Certainly an aspect of his defence is his belief of an entitlement to act in the manner in which he acted.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I understand that. As I say, that would not be accepted as a matter of law, but it would be seen as being generated by his organic brain damage condition.
MR GILL: Yes. Yes, and it goes to that criteria under the mental impairment.
HIS HONOUR: I would have difficulty in rejecting that I think.
MR GILL: The significance of that on the application for a stay is that when one looks at the nature of the offence and one looks at the nature of the accused, the offence itself does not fall in the degree of magnitude that one saw in the Mills case.
HIS HONOUR: It does not, no that is true.
MR GILL: Meaning that a lesser delay justifies a finding that there has been an unjustifiable delay because of the nature of the offence that is brought before the Court.
HIS HONOUR: I think that having regard to the history of the matter, on balance, I do not think a case for a stay is made out.
MR GILL: As the Court pleases.
HIS HONOUR: Mr Lawton.
MR LAWTON: Your Honour, did we mark that report of Dr George as an exhibit?
HIS HONOUR: No I have not, but I can do so.
MR LAWTON: Yes.
HIS HONOUR: All right, do you want me to mark that as Exhibit 1?
MR LAWTON: Thank you, your Honour.
EXHIBIT 1 - DR GEORGE’S REPORT
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: In terms of the case statement, as you have already said there is some disagreement about the fact that I - - -
HIS HONOUR: Some details.
MR LAWTON: And my friend does with to cross-examine briefly Mr Franks.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: I will call him now and then I understand my friend may call some evidence from Mr Bailiff in respect to the issue of mental impairment.
MR GILL: I will make a Prasad application first, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, well that may be appropriate in the circumstances, given Exhibit 1.
MR LAWTON: Yes.
HIS HONOUR: All right, okay. Proceed.
MR LAWTON: Thank you, your Honour. I call Gerald Franks.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour if you call me I can let you know what happened as well if you wish.
HIS HONOUR: That is all right, we may not need it Mr Bailiff because I do not think there will be very much dispute about it.
MR BAILIFF: Well he had come into my house on numerous occasions with the keys.
HIS HONOUR: All right. Calm down, be quiet and we will just hear this evidence first.
MR BAILIFF: Thank you, your Honour.
GERALD DAVID FRANKS, Affirmed:

EXAMINATION-IN-CHIEF BY MR LAWTON

MR LAWTON: Sir, can you tell the court your full name?---Gerald David Franks.
And you are employed as a social worker at the Canberra Men’s Centre?---I am employed as a Director of the Men’s Centre, yes.
And in respect to the matter before the Court you are aware that you are here to give evidence today about a matter involving Mr Bailiff that occurred on 30 January 2009?---Correct.
And on that day you provided a handwritten statement to police about what you witnessed on that day?---Correct.
And you signed that statement noting to the best of your ability the contents of the statement were true and you are willing to give evidence about them in court?---Correct.
I will show you firstly this document, sir. Can you just confirm that that is a photocopy of the statement you gave on that day and it includes your signature at the end of the statement?---It is, and it does.
And have you had a chance to read that in relatively recent times?---Yes, I read it this morning.
And to the best of your recollection the contents are true?---Yes.
Thank you. I tender that statement, your Honour. I also hand up a typed copy of the statement which was typed a fortnight later.
HIS HONOUR: No objection?
MR GILL: No, there is no objection to that, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: That will be Exhibit 2.
EXHIBIT 2 - STATEMENT OF GERALD FRANKS

MR GILL: Just let his Honour have a chance to read that statement Mr Lawton.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I have read that.
MR LAWTON: Yes thanks. Just to be clear, Mr Franks, the car that you were driving on that day was owned by the Canberra Men’s Centre?---Correct.
And you did not give Mr Bailiff permission to damage the car on that day?---No, I did not.
That is all the questions I have, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Thank you. Just one before you start Mr Gill. I understand there was a statement by Mr Bailiff to the effect that you could send the bill to his trustee. Did you do that?---Yes, we did, yes.
It was paid up?---Via the insurance company.
Yes, and it was paid up?---Yes, yes.
Thank you. Yes, Mr Gill.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR GILL

MR GILL: Yes, thank you, your Honour. Mr Franks you were the head lessee of that house, is that right?---Correct. Canberra Men’s Centre is the head lessee, yes.
And when was it that Canberra Men’s Centre became the head lessee of the house, roughly?---Roughly 12 months prior to that, it may have been a bit less.
And did that follow some sort of litigation about whether or not Mr Bailiff would be given a house?---The process as I recall it was that Mr Bailiff was under threat of eviction from Housing ACT and Housing ACT approached Canberra Men’s Centre and asked us if we would be prepared to provide an accommodation option for Mr Bailiff in the community, to which we agreed.
Was some sort of order made by Mr Anforth about the provision of a house for Mr Bailiff?---I do not recall.
Do you ever recall Mr Bailiff speaking to you about Mr Anforth making an order for him to receive a house?---Not specifically.
At the time of this incident was there a high degree of conflict between yourself and Mr Bailiff?---At the time of the incident? Not a high degree at the time of the incident.
Well let me ask you this. Had Mr Bailiff expressed his disagreement with Canberra Men’s Centre being on the lease?---Yes.
And he had done that on numerous occasions?---Yes.
Did he believe, in fact, that you were the person on the lease? Sorry, did he indicate to you that he believed that you were the person on the lease rather than the Canberra Men’s Centre?---That is a detail that I do not recall.
Did you visit that house from time to time?---Yes.
Did you have a key to that house?---Yes.
Did Mr Bailiff express to you that he was not happy with you having a key which allowed you entry into the house?---Yes.
Mr Bailiff expressed to you that he did not want you entering the
house?---Without his permission, yes.
Were there occasions on which you entered the house without his permission?---Never.
MR BAILIFF: Objection, your Honour. I have got the note here left in my house - - -
HIS HONOUR: Mr Bailiff, sit down.
MR BAILIFF: He is lying, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: It is not your turn yet.
MR GILL: Now, there was some sort of construction on the footpath area, is that right?---Correct.
And had there been arguments between yourself and Mr Bailiff about whether that needed to be removed?---On the day.
And did you have an argument before that time about whether it needed to be removed?---Not about the structure. About the pile of soil.
Right. And did you provide him with a deadline for removal of the
item?---I did.
All right. And what was the deadline?---I do not recall.
Did you tell him he needed to remove the structure by the end of the week? If you do not remember, you can say you do not remember?---Yes, I do not remember.
Do you remember whether or not you told him that the end of the week was to be a Thursday?---I remember giving him the details of a directive that was provided to me. The exact date, I do not recall. There was a timeline that was provided by, I believe, Housing ACT.
You seemed to indicate in your statement that Mr Bailiff made some sort of threat to harm you?---Yes.
Was that what you meant to say in your statement?---Yes.
All right. I want to suggest to you that you are incorrect when you assert that he said, “I’ll bash you”?---I have told it as I heard it from Mr Bailiff on the day.
Do you ever find it hard to follow what he is saying?---Not really. There are times when the conversation is prolonged and it does become different. In the early stages when our conversations are in a calm frame of mind, Mr Bailiff can sound particularly rational.
They were not calm this particular day, were they?---At the early stages of the conversation, yes.
How quickly did they become uncalm?---Almost instantly when he stood up and decided to go down and damage the vehicle.
That was after you had given him a directive about removal of the material?---It is as according to the statement. I talked to him about removing the material, yes.
And that was also in the context of his ongoing disagreement about you having a key to enter what he regarded as his house?---No, it was not about that at all.
How long had he been expressing to you his disagreement about you being able to enter his house?---Probably about six months. Maybe a bit longer.
However long it was, did you observe that to be something that he would become upset about?---Yes.
I come back to the incident with the car now. You say that two different rocks were put through the various windows?---Yes.
Can I suggest to you that it was one rock put through the two windows? Do you agree with that?
HIS HONOUR: In other words, it could have been the same rock he picked up again after he - - -?---Absolutely.
MR GILL: It could be?---It certainly could be.
He immediately offered compensation in respect of the damage that was done?---Correct.
And he indicated to you some purpose connected with getting into the Supreme Court when he did it?---I do not recall him saying anything about the Supreme Court. I do recall him saying, “Now I have an issue with Canberra Men’s Centre.”
MR BAILIFF: Objection, your Honour, that is so untruthful. I was there.
HIS HONOUR: All right. Just take a seat, Mr Bailiff. We will come to your case in due course.
MR BAILIFF: I just want you to know this guy is lying, or he has got dementia.
HIS HONOUR: Well, we will work that out later.
MR GILL: They are all the questions I have got for Mr Franks. Thank you, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Thank you.
MR LAWTON: There is nothing arising, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Thank you, Mr Franks. You are excused.
WITNESS WITHDREW

HIS HONOUR: Now, Mr Lawton.
MR LAWTON: That is the evidence for the Crown, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Okay.
MR GILL: Before commencing the defence case, which involves calling Mr Bailiff, your Honour, I say that the material before you is such as to justify an acquittal without hearing anything further. I rely on the authority of R v Prasad 23 SASR 161, which simply reflects what, of course, is the case in any trial, that once the prosecution case closes, the fact finder is entitled to acquit if they are not at that point persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt as to the guilt.
HIS HONOUR: The only ground upon which I could base that would be mental impairment.
MR GILL: At this point, yes.
HIS HONOUR: You understand what the consequences of that will be?
MR GILL: Yes.
HIS HONOUR: Well, let us just take that in order. First of all, mental impairment does include brain damage.
MR BAILIFF: Thank you, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: That definitely brings it within that particular concept.
You then go to section 28 of the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT) (‘Criminal Code’). He obviously, it would seem to me, did know the nature and quality of his conduct. Pursuant to Dr George’s reports, there may be a question about his capacity to control it. That certainly does seem to arise.
MR GILL: Certainly it seemed to represent some sort of justification for his actions.
HIS HONOUR: He certainly would not be able to reason with a moderate degree of sense or composure.
MR GILL: No.
HIS HONOUR: He obviously thought the conduct was not wrong.
MR GILL: Yes.
HIS HONOUR: Albeit objectively you cannot agree with that.
MR GILL: Yes, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Mr Lawton?
MR LAWTON: In terms of section 28(1)(b) of the Criminal Code and the qualification in subsection (2) - - -
HIS HONOUR: I’m going to section 28 (1) (c).
MR LAWTON: Are you going to (c), your Honour?
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: I thought you were dealing with section 28(1)(b).
HIS HONOUR: Section 28(1)(b) has been addressed, but I am saying that (c) seems also to be engaged.
MR LAWTON: Yes. It is difficult to divorce. We have the evidence of the prosecution. We have what was expressed by Mr Franks in that it appeared to him that Mr Bailiff decided to smash the car windscreens.
HIS HONOUR: I think that is certainly a justifiable inference. The question is not whether he did decide it but what his knowledge about the wrongfulness of his conduct was and how that was derived. That is the first point. Second, whether the conduct was in any meaningful sense of the word able to be controlled.
MR LAWTON: I submit that your Honour, at this stage, in terms of (c), could be satisfied on the prosecution case that he could control his conduct. But perhaps the issue that your Honour would still need to determine is in terms of paragraph (b) and the qualification of subsection (2). At this stage, I would say to your Honour that with respect to the application made by my friend, the evidence is not so inherently weak. It is quite strong in terms of the actions.
HIS HONOUR: I am not concerned with his actions in this respect. I accept that the actions of smashing the windscreens did take place, and it was apparently an act of will on Mr Bailiff’s part because he rejected the proposition that his structure should be removed.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, I gave him a chance to drive his car away after he threatened me - - -
HIS HONOUR: Okay, that is all right. I am not concerned about a chance to drive away.
MR BAILIFF: He could have driven away, your Honour. I am from Healesville, your Honour. That is where bushfires happen, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: I do not want to know about the bushfires.
MR BAILIFF: This is just when the bushfires were happening, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: I just want to listen to Mr Lawton for the moment.
MR BAILIFF: Yes, cool.
MR LAWTON: I will be very brief, your Honour. I submit on those conclusions your Honour is reaching that (a) and (c) are not enlivened but the issue still remains - - -
HIS HONOUR: Certainly I am satisfied (a) is not engaged. I am not satisfied that (c) is not engaged but that is not the question. The question is whether it is engaged. (b) on the other hand - - -
MR LAWTON: (b) is perhaps probably the pertinent one, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, it is.
MR LAWTON: And we are talking on the balance of probabilities in subsection (5). I submit that your Honour needs to hear something more before being satisfied. Of course the difficulty is that one has to divorce what Mr Bailiff has been saying in court today and other days. That is not part of the evidence before you.
HIS HONOUR: There is some question about that. I appreciate her Honour, Penfold J, was talking about that in relation to the plea. But certainly in relation to a jury trial, the conduct of the accused in court is something the jury can take into account.
MR LAWTON: That is right, your Honour. But I suppose what I am saying - - -
HIS HONOUR: With some qualification.
MR LAWTON: With some qualifications and bearing in mind that the proper trial has only commenced some 20 minutes ago. What happened this morning was separate to that.
HIS HONOUR: It was, yes.
MR LAWTON: So my submission would be that although there is some support for section 28(1)(b) being enlivened, your Honour would need to hear something more before being satisfied on the balance of probabilities that it has been made out.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, can I put myself in the witness box and be cross-examined by my lawyer please?
HIS HONOUR: No.
MR BAILIFF: Or barrister.
HIS HONOUR: I do not need it.
MR BAILIFF: I recall everything, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Excellent. But in this case the issue that has been raised is whether section 28(1)(b) of the Criminal Code is engaged and whether on the balance of probabilities it has been established that the person did not within the meaning of section 28(1)(b) know his conduct was wrong. For that purpose I take account of section (2) which refers to the fact that: “[a] person does not know the conduct is wrong, if the person cannot reason with a moderate degree of sense and composure about whether the conduct, as seen by a reasonable person, is wrong.”
In my opinion, the report of Dr George, which has been tendered by the prosecution as Exhibit 1, would justify a finding consistent with section 28(1)(b). It certainly seems to me that Mr Franks’ evidence is consistent with that too. There was no rational reason why Mr Bailiff should have damaged Mr Franks’ car. I appreciate Mr Bailiff may have thought that he had a good reason. However, that is the very point: that there was not reasoning with a moderate degree of sense and composure about whether this conduct, as seen by a reasonable person, was wrong. In fact, I do not think Mr Bailiff would even know what that standard meant in his state of mind.
So for that reason I do find that Mr Bailiff is not guilty of the offence charged by reason of mental impairment.
MR LAWTON: As your Honour pleases.
MR BAILIFF: Can I give the reason please?
HIS HONOUR: I have got the reasons. I do not need any more.
MR BAILIFF: But can I give you the reason, your Honour?
HIS HONOUR: No. I have already got it.
MR BAILIFF: Can I just jump in the witness box and give the reason?
HIS HONOUR: No, you cannot.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour, I knew very well that when people are about to die in bushfires and I am being threatened by some guy in 43 degree temperature - - -
HIS HONOUR: Mr Bailiff, I have just found you not guilty. Sit down.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour, that is not fair.
HIS HONOUR: That I found you not guilty?
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, I want you to realise that if I gave the symptoms of brain damage - - -
HIS HONOUR: I have got it.
MR BAILIFF: Well your Honour, I meant if I gave it to you - - -
HIS HONOUR: I have got it.
MR BAILIFF: Great that you have it. And if you have the thing, the two sources where it is from, those books - - -
HIS HONOUR: I do.
MR BAILIFF: Then your Honour, you might consider putting the symptoms of brain damage in a law report, as in a decision - - -
HIS HONOUR: No.
MR BAYLSIS: This would be a common law decision, your Honour, so it has the symptoms of brain damage.
HIS HONOUR: Mr Bailiff, I have made that decision. The decision is that by reason of mental impairment, which is as a result of your organic brain damage, you are not guilty of this offence.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour, can you not you have the symptoms of brain damage in your judgment? I mean like - - -
HIS HONOUR: I just did.
MR BAILIFF: But your Honour, you did not type what I - - -
HIS HONOUR: It is all in the transcript.
MR BAILIFF: But I did not read the symptoms of over familiarity, the callousness, the insensitivity, elevation of mood factors, euphoric. Your Honour - - -
HIS HONOUR: You have now mentioned them all, they are all on the transcript.
MR BAILIFF: Do you want me to read you all four, your Honour, so it is on record?
HIS HONOUR: You just mentioned them, Mr Bailiff, it is all on the record now.
MR BAILIFF: But the whole page, I have not read it to you, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: You do not have to.
MR BAILIFF: I mean, your Honour, the best man in relation to this is my stepfather, okay. I just need a law report to benefit others, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Okay. Enough. That is enough.
MR BAILIFF: So your Honour, I did understand that you handed down a decision.
HIS HONOUR: Okay. Now what is the next order, Mr Lawton.
MR LAWTON: Your Honour, you have made a special verdict of not guilty by reason of mental impairment. That enlivens division 13.3 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) (‘Crimes Act’).
HIS HONOUR: Yes, obviously custody is not appropriate.
MR LAWTON: Well I think it is a non serious offence in any case, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: I am not sure about that.
MR LAWTON: It is just in section 325 of the Crimes Act.
MR GILL: Section 300 deals with serious offences.
HIS HONOUR: 300.
MR BAILIFF: Thank you, your Honour, for the decision.
HIS HONOUR: That is all right.
MR LAWTON: It is not a serious offence.
HIS HONOUR: No, it is not, you are right.
MR LAWTON: So the only option your Honour has, under section 328 of the Crimes Act, you can make an order that he submit to the jurisdiction of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (‘ACAT’).
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: I’m sorry, 328 refers to the Magistrates Court. It is section 323, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: That is right.
MR LAWTON: Now you do actually still have a power to detain him in custody.
HIS HONOUR: I could do that, I know, but I do not think it is appropriate.
MR LAWTON: The difference is that you might recall in the matter of R v Nicholls [2010] ACTSC 25 that section 324 makes the presumption that he will be detained in custody.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: There is not such a presumption in section 323.
HIS HONOUR: No, I understand that.
MR LAWTON: The only issue that perhaps might be of benefit, your Honour, is to perhaps hear - and my friend might have some evidence to this effect anyway - about what ACAT is doing in terms of the ongoing treatment of Mr Bailiff. You will recall from this morning’s proceedings that Dr George has expressed concerns that he does need perhaps to be better treated than he currently is.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR LAWTON: And whilst most of the offences for which Mr Bailiff comes before the Court cannot be considered to be at the upper end of the spectrum, one is always concerned that they may escalate in the future if that treatment is not enforced.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, I will be extraordinarily, extremely well behaved.
HIS HONOUR: Well, can I make one thing clear to you. You cannot go around breaking windows.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, I will never do that ever again, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Good.
MR BAILIFF: I am just trying to get rid of the Canberra Men’s Centre. It cost me six grand for security expenses at my house and they came to my house all the time.
HIS HONOUR: All right. Well we do not want to know about that now, because I am just telling you that you cannot act like that, all right?
MR BAILIFF: No, I will never do that, your Honour. I will never do that. Your Honour, the longest serving police officer, that is my great-grandfather, Billy Bunker Aiden, 1832 to 1995. Your Honour, the Bailiffs went from Normandy during the intensive fighting in the Battle of Hastings. You know, a Bailiff has to go to court. So your Honour, I come from a military and legal background. I would never do such a thing, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Good.
MR BAILIFF: I only do what is required.
HIS HONOUR: Can you take a seat now?
MR BAILIFF: Okay. But your Honour can I have the symptoms of brain damage in a law report, your Honour?
HIS HONOUR: Mr Bailiff, take a seat.
MR BAILIFF: Because it is not in the law library, your Honour, and I will be so grateful.
HIS HONOUR: All right.
MR LAWTON: In terms of what the ACAT is doing with Mr Bailiff, I am afraid I need to take some instructions from my instructor who has been detained in another court.
HIS HONOUR: He may get paroled, you never know.
MR LAWTON: He might. But to get a coherent answer to your Honour I think I need to do it that way.
HIS HONOUR: All right. Well when do you want to come back?
MR LAWTON: Would your Honour allow that to occur after the lunch break?
HIS HONOUR: Well I can, or I can make it a bit later.
MR LAWTON: That should be sufficient.
HIS HONOUR: Here he comes.
MR LAWTON: If your Honour would just give me a moment?
HIS HONOUR: Yes, sure.
MR GILL: Perhaps while my friend does that, your Honour. Mr Hancock of the Attorney-General’s Office asked me to pass on that the Attorney has declined to intervene in respect to the notice to the Human Rights Act.
HIS HONOUR: Well as it happened, that was not necessary.
MR GILL: Yes.
MR BAILIFF: Sorry your Honour, we went to the library and I googled brain damage, there is nothing there in the law reports, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Okay.
MR BAILIFF: Can you help with that, your Honour?
HIS HONOUR: Yes, we will add something.
MR BAILIFF: Because my stepfather will not talk to me if I do not have a brain damage precedent, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Right.
MR BAILIFF: You know, he can give evidence if you want, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: No, we do not need him.
MR BAILIFF: But he would love a decision - - -
HIS HONOUR: I am sure he would but we do not need him. Okay?
MR GILL: Your Honour, I am told that there are no ACAT proceedings in relation to mental health. There have been ACAT proceedings in relation to a guardianship order, but not in relation to a mental health order. And we do not believe there has been any application for a treatment order for at least the last 12 months, probably longer than that.
HIS HONOUR: Well I cannot make a treatment order obviously.
MR BAILIFF: Can you send me to a neurologist, your Honour, a neurologist, Alan Leeshman in London, for the holidays?
MR GILL: So that is all I can tell your Honour about that.
HIS HONOUR: All I can do is make an order requiring him to submit to the jurisdiction of ACAT to enable ACAT to make recommendations.
MR GILL: And the question is, does your Honour want recommendations back from ACAT at the end of that process?
HIS HONOUR: And whether that is useful in the circumstances I do not know.
MR GILL: I do not know what your Honour could do if recommendations were made to you at that point.
HIS HONOUR: I cannot make a treatment order for a start.
MR GILL: No. So the legislative scheme does not quite make sense to me, I have to say your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes. Well there is a power to make orders considered appropriate which I assume means, amongst other things, if there was a recommendation from ACAT, I can make an order to give effect to those recommendations insofar as the power of the Court extends.
MR BAILIFF: Dr George’s report was his recommendation from ACAT, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Thank you. I have got that.
MR BAILIFF: I am being further traumatised by ACAT who do not have a neurologist and it is so upsetting.
HIS HONOUR: It is very upsetting I am sure.
MR BAILIFF: But I can give them a new precedent.
HIS HONOUR: Okay.
MR GILL: So that there is a question, your Honour, as to the utility of a referral to ACAT.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I am thinking about it.
MR GILL: It is a discretionary resolution of the matter, and what is not before your Honour is any material which says the discretion ought to be exercised by a referral to ACAT for recommendations.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR BAILIFF: You can refer me to my GP over the road, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: I could.
MR BAILIFF: Alan Leeshman, sorry not Alan Leeshman, Stephen Moulding, sorry.
HIS HONOUR: Okay. I have got an idea in mind. Anything you want to say Mr Lawton?
MR LAWTON: I suppose the utility of the referral to ACAT is indeed to find out if they plan to consider an application for a psychiatric treatment order.
HIS HONOUR: Or anything.
MR LAWTON: Or anything. But obviously from the look of section 323, and your Honour might recall from the matter of R v Michael Gary Caine SCC No 214 of 2008 we referred it to the Tribunal, ACAT I should say, so that they could give an indication to your Honour what treatment would be involved and whether or not there would be some utility in the treatment of having him detained and then effectively released immediately. I do not know whether that would arise here.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour can I offer to give evidence from the witness box, your Honour, please?
HIS HONOUR: You can offer it, but I am not accepting it. I do not see the utility of requiring him to submit to ACAT absent any application from anybody including Dr George. We could always do that anyway. It seems to me the only thing I can do, Mr Bailiff, is to extract from you an undertaking that in the next 12 months you will not engage in any criminal conduct.
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour I am working on this. I promise for the rest of my life I will never do anything except take cases to the High Court, your Honour, involving Sir Anthony.
HIS HONOUR: All right.
MR BAILIFF: And Sir Anthony and I have become friends, and your Honour can I just put on the record, it is in Hansard, in Parliament, that I am the man who took the action in the High Court that prompted every Police Commissioner in the country to contact Canberra and the Australian Crime Commission to be established. Your Honour it is on the world stage that I got the Pope’s apology to Oceania in 60 days, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Excellent.
MR BAILIFF: So whilst Phil says delusion, your Honour, it is brilliance, your Honour. Sir Anthony even said I was his brilliant law student, and I am giving his phone number and - - -
HIS HONOUR: All right, I have got your promise, have I?
MR BAILIFF: Your Honour, you have got my oath. Do you want me to get into the witness box and give oath evidence?
HIS HONOUR: Perfect. In that case, the proceedings are concluded.



MR BAILIFF: Your Honour I will never do anything, your Honour, I am really grateful, your Honour. Your Honour, can I shake your hand, your Honour? I thank you, your Honour, God bless you, your Honour.
I certify that the preceding three hundred and forty (340) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of his Honour, Chief Justice Higgins.

Associate:

Date: 30 January 2012


Counsel for the Crown: Mr J Lawton
Solicitor for the Crown: Director of Public Prosecution for the ACT
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr S Gill
Solicitor for the Defendant: Kamy Saeedi Lawyers
Date of hearing: 30 November 2011







Date of judgment: 30 November 2011


DC 20036 US, Kath Cummins @KathCummins Director of Public Affairs, National Center for Victims of Crime, National Center for Victims of Crime 2000 M Street NW, Phone: (202) 467-8700, Suite 480 Washington,

No comments:

Post a Comment